Dergiler / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Explicit Teaching and Implicit Learning of Concept and Generalization Structure on The Acquisition of Explicit Knowledge of Concept and Generalization Structure

Sayfa
19–38
Yayın Tarihi
2014-03-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, it is recommended that students should be exposed to a wide number of correct examples and to frequently have applied the practices with a view to making the gained explicit knowledge usable in a specific context.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz The general purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of explicit teaching and implicit learning of the concept and generalization structure on the acquisition of explicit knowledge regarding concept and generalization structure in the Learning-Teaching Theories and Approaches course instructed in the non-thesis master’s program of the Secondary Education Teaching Department in Educational Sciences.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study was conducted as a pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental design with 97 students in two experimental and two control groups.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, it is recommended that students should be exposed to a wide number of correct examples and to frequently have applied the practices with a view to making the gained explicit knowledge usable in a specific context.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Explicit teaching · Implicit learning · Explicit knowledge

Özet

Öz The general purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of explicit teaching and implicit learning of the concept and generalization structure on the acquisition of explicit knowledge regarding concept and generalization structure in the Learning-Teaching Theories and Approaches course instructed in the non-thesis master’s program of the Secondary Education Teaching Department in Educational Sciences. The study was conducted as a pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental design with 97 students in two experimental and two control groups. The data was analysed using means, standard deviations, adjusted means, chi-square analysis, one-way Anova, covariance (Ancova) and Bonferroni analysis. Results indicate that when compared to implicit learning, the explicit teaching provided to the first experimental group was found to be effective in the acquisition of explicit knowledge regarding concept and generalization structure, increasing the perceived confidence rating about the accuracy of responses, and providing successful learning. However, it is recommended that students should be exposed to a wide number of correct examples and to frequently have applied the practices with a view to making the gained explicit knowledge usable in a specific context.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAŞ, M. A., COŞKUN, M. M. K. (2014). The Effect of Explicit Teaching and Implicit Learning of Concept and Generalization Structure on The Acquisition of Explicit Knowledge of Concept and Generalization Structure. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 19–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/6235

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Abrahamsen, F. E., Robert, G. C., & Pensgaard, A. M. (2007). Achievement goals and gender effects on multidimensional anxiety in national elite sport. Psychology of Sport Exercise, 9, 449-464.
  2. Akın, A. (2006). 2X2 Başarı Yönelimleri Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 1-13.
  3. Akın, A. (2007). Akademik kontrol odağı ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34 (3), 9-17.
  4. Akın, A., (2012). Self-compassion and automatic thoughts. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 1-10.
  5. Akın, A. (2012). Self-handicapping scale: A study of validity and reliability. Education and Science, 37 (164), 177-188.
  6. Amato, P. R., & Gilbreth, J. G. (1999). Nonresident fathers and children’s well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 557-573.
  7. Ames, C. (1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A cognitive-motivational analysis. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education. Vol. 1: Student Motivation (pp. 177-208).
  8. Greenwich, CT: Academic Press.
  9. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359- 372. Arslan, A. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının amaç yönelimleri ile yapılandırmacılığa yönelik görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30 (1), 107-122.
  10. Bacanlı, F. & Sürücü, M. (2006). ilköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin sınav kaygıları ve karar verme stilleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi,45, 7-35.
  11. Blanchard, C., & Vallerand, R.J. (1996). On the social and interpersonal determinants of situational motivation. (Unpublished manuscript). University of Quebec at Montreal, Canada. Brophy, J. (2005). Goal theorists should move on from performance goals. Educational Psychologist, 40(3), 167-76.
  12. Chan, K. W. (2007). Hong Kong teacher education students' goal orientations and their relationship to perceived parenting style. Educational Psychology, 27, 157-172.
  13. Ciani, K. D., Middleton, M. J., Summers, J. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (2010). Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 88–99. doi:10.1080/01443411003660232. De Bruyn, E. H; Dekovid, M. & Meijnen, G. W. (2003). Parenting goal orientations; classroom behaviour and school success in early adolescence. Journal of Applied De