KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Teachers’ ICT Skills Scale (TICTS): Reliability and Validity

Yalın Kılıç Türel
Tuncay Yavuz ÖZDEMİR
Filiz VAROL
Sayfa
503–516
Yayın Tarihi
2017-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, the instrument is a reliable and valid scale to investigate teachers’ ICT skills.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz The purpose of this study is to assess the reliability and validity of a questionnaire developed to measure teachers’ skills for using information and communication technologies (ICT).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the first stage, the researchers developed an item pool including 18 items based on a five-point Likert-type style.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, the instrument is a reliable and valid scale to investigate teachers’ ICT skills.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler ICT · ICT integration · in-service teachers

Özet

Öz The purpose of this study is to assess the reliability and validity of a questionnaire developed to measure teachers’ skills for using information and communication technologies (ICT). The study consisted of three stages. In the first stage, the researchers developed an item pool including 18 items based on a five-point Likert-type style. During the second stage, we collected data from 304 teachers. To demonstrate the reliability and validity of the scale, researchers conducted an exploratory factor analysis using maximum likelihood with oblimin rotation. The factor analysis resulted in a 16-item and three-factor construct that explained 61.5% of the total variance. The researchers also conduct the parallel analysis to confirm the results of eigenvalue criterion. In terms of the reliability of the scale, we calculated the Cronbach’s alpha values for the overall survey, Factor-1 (3 items), Factor-2 (5 items), and Factor-3 (8 items) as .91, .74, .85, and .89, respectively. Thus, the instrument is a reliable and valid scale to investigate teachers’ ICT skills.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Türel, Y. K., ÖZDEMİR, T. Y., VAROL, F. (2017). Teachers’ ICT Skills Scale (TICTS): Reliability and Validity. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 503–516. https://ajindex.com/articles/6166

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Akin, M., (2007). Effects of using computer and internet technologies in creating applied subject matter [Bilgisayar ve internet teknolojilerinden yararlanmanin uygulama alan bilgisi olusturma yonunde etkisi (Erzincan Egitim Fakultesi ornegi)], Journal of Erzincan Education Faculty, 9(2), 49-70.
  2. Alev, N. & Yigit N. (2009). Lecturers' stages of concern and stages of adoption of Information and communication technologies into teacher education programs [Ogretim elemanlarinin bilgi ve iletisim teknolojilerini ogretmen egitim programlarina uyarlamasinda ilgi-endise ve benimseme seviyeleri]. Cukurova University Journal of Education [Cukurova Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi], 37(3), 82-91.
  3. Altun, T., (2012). Development of Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) Co-ordinators’ Role Perceptions Scale (ICTCRPS). Elementary Education Online, 11(4), 869-881.
  4. Aydin, H. (2000). Use of electronic performance support systems in teaches' trainin session. [Ogretmenlerin Hizmet Ici Egitiminde Elektronik Performans Destek Sisteminin Kullanilmasi]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 8(8), 141-150.
  5. Baki, A. & Ersoy, Y. (1998). Technology Preparation for In-service Mathematics Teachers Through a Short-Term Inservice Course, Proceedings of International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Publishers.
  6. Belland, B. (2009). Using the theory of habitus to move beyond the study of barriers to technology integration. Computers & Education, 52(2), 353-364.
  7. Bingimlas, K. (2009). Barriers to the successful Integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245.
  8. Borokhovski, E. F., Bernard, R. M., Tamim, R. M., & Schmid, R. F. (2017). Technology integration in postsecondary education: a summary of findings from a set of related meta-analyses. Российский Психологический Журнал, 13(4), 284-302
  9. Buyukozturk, S. (2007). Data analysis handbook for social studies [Sosyal Bilimler Icin Veri Analizi El Kitabi]. Ankara:
  10. Pegem A Publishing. Capar, F., & Vural, O. F. (2013). Obstacle to e-government: Digital division. [E-devletlesme onundeki engel: Dijital esitsizlik]. International Journal of Human Sciences, 10(1), 1674-1692.
  11. Carlson, S. and C.T. Gadio. (2002). Teacher professional development in the use of technology. In W.D. Haddad and A. Draxler (Eds), Technologies for education: Potentials, parameters, and prospects. Paris and Washing