KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5

The midgut bacterial fora of the hard tick Hyalomma anatolicum (Acari: Ixodidae) from South India as determined by molecular analyses

Mani KANNAN
Muthukalingan KRISHNAN
Sankarappan ANBALAGAN
Vimalanathan PRASANNA ARUN
Sayfa
520–525
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Furtherstudy is needed to understand the relationship between midgut bacterial community and tick pathogen interaction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The midgut bacterial fora of post-blood meal and starved or digested blood meal of hard ticks (Hyalomma anatolicum )from goats were analyzed using BOX PCR, ERIC PCR and 16S rDNA gene sequencing.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In total, 9 bacterial species belonging to 2 genera (Bacillus andStaphylococcus) were identifed in the midgut of both types (post-blood meal and digested blood meal) of tick by using 16S rDNA genesequencing.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Furtherstudy is needed to understand the relationship between midgut bacterial community and tick pathogen interaction.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The midgut bacterial fora of post-blood meal and starved or digested blood meal of hard ticks (Hyalomma anatolicum )from goats were analyzed using BOX PCR, ERIC PCR and 16S rDNA gene sequencing. BOX PCR and ERIC PCR showed dissimilarband patterns between microbial isolates from the midgut of the ticks. In total, 9 bacterial species belonging to 2 genera (Bacillus andStaphylococcus) were identifed in the midgut of both types (post-blood meal and digested blood meal) of tick by using 16S rDNA genesequencing. The majority of the midgut bacterial species were Staphylococcus sp. (90%) and there was a high frequency of 3 species ofStaphylococcus ( S. chromogenes, S. epidermidis, and S. gallinarum ). Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rDNA gene sequences showedthat all midgut isolates were monophyletic and showed high-frequency relationships with S. chromogenes and S. epidermidis. Furtherstudy is needed to understand the relationship between midgut bacterial community and tick pathogen interaction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KANNAN, M., KRISHNAN, M., ANBALAGAN, S., ARUN, V. P. (2022). The midgut bacterial fora of the hard tick Hyalomma anatolicum (Acari: Ixodidae) from South India as determined by molecular analyses. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5, 520–525. https://ajindex.com/articles/615282

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Shyma KP, Kumar S, Sharma AK, Ray DD, Ghosh S. Acaricide resistance status in Indian isolates of Hyalomma anatolicum. Exp Appl Acarol 2012; 58: 471–481
  2. Belozerov VN, Naumov RL. Nymphal diapause and its photoperiodic control in the tick Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae). Folia Parasitol 2002; 49: 314–318
  3. Latif AA. Tick (Acari = Ixodoidea: Ixodidae) immatures feeding on cattle, camels and sheep in the Sudan, with notes on behaviour of Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum larvae fed on diferent hosts. Insect Sci Applicat 1985; 6: 59–61
  4. Aktas M, Dumanli N, Angin M. Cattle infestation by Hyalomma ticks and prevalence of Teileria in Hyalomma species in the east of Turkey. Veterinary Parasitol 2004; 119; 1–8
  5. Aktas M, Altay K, Dumanli N, Kalkan A. Molecular detection and identifcation of Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species in ixodid ticks. Parasitol Res 2009; 104: 1243–1248
  6. Brown CGD. Dynamics and impact of tick-borne diseases of cattle. Trop Anim Health Prod 1997; 29: 1S–3S
  7. Welburn SC, Maudlin I. Tsetse-trypanosome interactions: rites of passage. Parasitol Today 1999; 15: 399–403
  8. Sanchez-Contreras M, Vlisidou I. Te diversity of insect- bacteria interactions and its applications for disease control. Biotechnol Genet Engineer Rev 2008; 25: 203–244
  9. Noda H, Munderloh UG, Kurtti TJ. Endosymbionts of ticks and their relationship to Wolbachia spp. and tick-borne pathogens of humans and animals. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997; 63: 3926–3932
  10. Miller WJ, Ehrman L, Schneider D. Infectious speciation revisited: impact of symbiont-depletion on female ftness and mating behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. PLoS Pathog 2010; 6: 1–17
  11. Kikuchi Y, Hayatsu M, Hosokawa T, Nagayama A, Tago K, Fukatsu T. Symbiont-mediated insecticide resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109: 8618–8622
  12. Ferrari J, Vavre F. Bacterial symbionts in insects or the story of communities afecting communities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2011; 366: 1389–400
  13. Murrel A, Dobson SJ, Yang X, Lacey E, Barker SC. A survey of bacterial diversity in ticks, lice and feas from Australia. Parasitol Res 2003; 89: 326–334
  14. Holt JG. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 9th ed. Baltimore, MD, USA: Williams and Wilkins; 1994
  15. Moore E, Arnscheidt A, Kruger A, Strompl C, Mau M. Simplified protocols for the preparation of genomic DNA from bacterial cultures. In: Kowalchuk G, De Bruijn FJ, Head I, Akkermans ADL, van Elsas JD, editors. Molecular Microbial Ecology