Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2

Management of a Coxiella burnetii-infected sheep flock after an outbreak of Q fever in humans

Sayfa
264–270
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It appears that extensive cleaning anddisinfection combined with vaccination could be regarded as an appropriate approach to control/prevent Q fever in farm settings evenin the short term.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Following an outbreak of Q fever in a group of students who contracted the infection during a training course on a sheepfarm, a detailed investigation of the sheep flock involved was conducted.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Of 478 flock animals, 60 Coxiella burnetii ELISA-positive and60 ELISA-negative ewes were selected for the trial and divided into four groups.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It appears that extensive cleaning anddisinfection combined with vaccination could be regarded as an appropriate approach to control/prevent Q fever in farm settings evenin the short term.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Following an outbreak of Q fever in a group of students who contracted the infection during a training course on a sheepfarm, a detailed investigation of the sheep flock involved was conducted. Of 478 flock animals, 60 Coxiella burnetii ELISA-positive and60 ELISA-negative ewes were selected for the trial and divided into four groups. A month after the initial ELISA screening, all ewesin the flock (except the control group) were vaccinated. Sequentially collected blood samples were tested with ELISA and PCR; feces,milk, manure, bedding, and soil were tested with PCR. The immune response to the vaccination was 92.7%, while the overall C. burnetiiseroprevalence in the flock after the human outbreak was 64.9%. PCR was positive for 0.2% of milk samples and 34.4% of fecal samplesof animals from all four trial groups. C. burnetii DNA was not detected in any of the blood samples. Manure was PCR-positive for about35 months; bedding from the stable was also positive while samples of pasture soil were negative. It appears that extensive cleaning anddisinfection combined with vaccination could be regarded as an appropriate approach to control/prevent Q fever in farm settings evenin the short term.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KRT, B., PATE, M., AVBERSEK, J., OCEPEK, M., SKIBIN, A. (2022). Management of a Coxiella burnetii-infected sheep flock after an outbreak of Q fever in humans. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2, 264–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/615200

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Arricau-Bouvery N, Rodolakis A. Is Q fever an emerging or re-emerging zoonosis? Vet Res 2005; 36: 327-349
  2. European Food Safety Authority. Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW); Scientific opinion on Q fever. EFSA J 2010; 8: 1595
  3. Maurin M, Raoult D. Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999; 12: 518-553
  4. Arricau-Bouvery N, Souriau A, Lechopier P, Rodolakis A. Experimental Coxiella burnetii infection in pregnant goats: excretion routes. Vet Res 2003; 34: 423-433
  5. Berri M, Souriau A, Crosby M, Crochet D, Lechopier P, Rodolakis A. Relationships between the shedding of Coxiella burnetii, clinical signs and serological responses of 34 sheep. Vet Rec 2001; 148: 502-505
  6. Angelakis E, Raoult D. Q fever. Vet Microbiol 2010; 140: 297- 309
  7. Van den Brom R, van Engelen E, Roest HI, van der Hoek W, Vellema P. Coxiella burnetii infections in sheep or goats: an opinionated review. Vet Microbiol 2015; 181: 119-129
  8. Grilc E, Socan M, Koren N, Ucakar V, Avsic T, Pogacnik M, Kraigher A. Outbreak of Q fever among a group of high school students in Slovenia, March-April 2007. Euro Surveill 2007; 12: E070719.1
  9. World Organization for Animal Health. Q fever. In: Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (Mammals, Birds and Bees). 5th ed. Paris, France: Office International des Epizooties; 2004. p. 395
  10. Berri M, Laroucau K, Rodolakis A. The detection of Coxiella burnetii from ovine genital swabs, milk and fecal samples by the use of a single touchdown polymerase chain reaction. Vet Microbiol 2000; 72: 285-293
  11. Astobiza I, Barandika JF, Ruiz-Fons F, Hurtado A, Povedano I, Juste RA, Garcia-Perez AL. Four-year evaluation of the effect of vaccination against Coxiella burnetii on reduction of animal infection and environmental contamination in a naturally infected dairy sheep flock. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77: 7405-7407
  12. Astobiza I, Barandika JF, Ruiz-Fons F, Hurtado A, Povedano I, Juste RA, Garcia-Perez AL. Coxiella burnetii shedding and environmental contamination at lambing in two highly naturally-infected dairy sheep flocks after vaccination. Res Vet Sci 2011; 91: e58-63
  13. Eibach R, Bothe F, Runge M, Ganter M. Long-term monitoring of a Coxiella burnetii-infected sheep flock after vaccination and antibiotic treatment under field conditions. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2013; 126: 3-9
  14. Hogerwerf L, van den Brom R, Roest HI, Bouma A, Vellema P, Pieterse M, Dercksen D, Nielen M. Reduction of Coxiella burnetii prev