KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Phylogrouping and antimicrobial resistance analysis of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from poultry species

Ranjan MAHADEVASWAMY
Samir JADHAV
Chandrakant BHONG
Dattatray GANDHALE
Rahul KOLHE
Saba NALBAND
Sujata BHAVE
Dushyant MUGLIKAR
Sayfa
117–126
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Poultry and raw chicken harbor multidrug-resistant, ESBL-type E. coli as well as ExPECand these strains may be transmitted to humans via the food chain.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of extraintestinal pathogenicEscherichia coli (ExPEC) in the feces of healthy poultry and retail chicken.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All 146 E. coli recovered from 351 samples were screened byPCR for detection of ExPEC strains.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Poultry and raw chicken harbor multidrug-resistant, ESBL-type E. coli as well as ExPECand these strains may be transmitted to humans via the food chain.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:351 samples
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of extraintestinal pathogenicEscherichia coli (ExPEC) in the feces of healthy poultry and retail chicken. All 146 E. coli recovered from 351 samples were screened byPCR for detection of ExPEC strains. Nineteen (13.01%) isolates were confirmed as ExPEC. Distribution of ExPEC strains was revealedas follows: broiler (25%), layer (15.87%), and raw chicken (3.12%). Turkey, duck, and water samples were negative for ExPEC strains.ExPEC strains belonged to phylogenetic groups B2 (52.63%), A (36.84%), and D (10.53%). Twenty-three (15.75%) isolates were ESBLpositive,including four ExPEC strains. ESBL-positive E. coli were isolated from all the samples except turkey. A high degree of resistanceto commonly used antimicrobials, namely nalidixic acid (95.89%), tetracycline (95.89%), trimethoprim (89.04%), colistin (82.88%), andciprofloxacin (54.11%), including β-lactam antimicrobials ampicillin (84.93%) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (81.51%), was expressedby the isolates. Out of fifteen randomly selected ESBL-positive E. coli isolates, β-lactam genes, namely blaTEM, blaCTX-M, and blaOXA,were detected in three, six, and one, respectively. Poultry and raw chicken harbor multidrug-resistant, ESBL-type E. coli as well as ExPECand these strains may be transmitted to humans via the food chain.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MAHADEVASWAMY, R., JADHAV, S., BHONG, C., GANDHALE, D., KOLHE, R., NALBAND, S., BHAVE, S., MUGLIKAR, D. (2022). Phylogrouping and antimicrobial resistance analysis of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from poultry species. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 117–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/614899

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Moyaert H, Jong AD, Simjee S, Thomas V. Antimicrobial resistance monitoring projects for zoonotic and indicator bacteria of animal origin: common aspects and differences between EASSA and EFSA. Vet Microbiol 2014; 171: 279-283
  2. Economou V, Gousia P. Agriculture and food animals as a source of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Infect Drug Resist 2015; 8: 49-61
  3. Bauchart P, Germon P, Bree A, Oswald E, Hacker J, Dobrindt U. Pathogenomic comparison of human extraintestinal and avian pathogenic Escherichia coli--search for factors involved in host specificity or zoonotic potential. Microb Pathog 2010; 49: 105-115
  4. Clermont O, Olier M, Hoede C, Diancourt L, Brisse S, Keroudean M, Glodt J, Picard B, Oswald E, Denamur E. Animal and human pathogenic Escherichia coli strains share common genetic backgrounds. Infect Genet Evol 2011; 11: 654-662
  5. Johnson JR, Murray AC, Gajewski A, Sullivan M, Snippes P, Kuskowski MA, Smith K. Isolation and molecular characterization of nalidixic acid-resistant extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli from retail chicken products. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 2161-2168
  6. Belanger L, Garenaux A, Harel J, Boulianne M, Nadeau E, Dozois CM. Escherichia coli from animal reservoirs as a potential source of human extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2011; 62: 1-10
  7. Ewers C, Antao E M, Diehl I, Philipp HC, Wieler LH. Intestine and environment of the chicken as reservoirs for extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli strains with zoonotic potential. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009; 75: 184-192
  8. Smet A, Martel A, Persoons D, Dewulf J, Heyndrickx M, Cloeckaert A, Praud K, Claeys G, Catry B, Herman L et al. Comparative analysis of Extended-spectrum-b-lactamase (ESBL)-carrying plasmids from different members of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from poultry, pigs and humans: evidence for a shared b-lactam resistance gene pool? J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 63: 1286-1288
  9. Dutta S, Guin S, Ghosh S, Pazhani GP, Rajendran K, Bhattacharya MK, Takeda Y, Nair GB, Ramamurthy T. Trends in the prevalence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli among hospitalized diarrheal patients in Kolkata, India. PLoS One 2013; 8: e56068
  10. Kar D, Bandyopadhyay S, Dimri U, Mondal DB, Nanda PK, Das AK, Batabyal S, Dandapat P, Bandyopadhyay S. Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles and capsaicin against MDR-ESBL producing Escherichia coli: an in vitro study. Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2016; 6: 807-810
  11. Quinn PJ, Carter