KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Using Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Technique in Teaching Computer Literacy on Students’ Achievement and Retention

Mehmet Tekdal
Seval SÖNMEZ
Sayfa
37–59
Yayın Tarihi
2018-04-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, no significant difference found between the groups on retention test scores.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz The main purpose of this empirical study was to investigate the effect of using jigsaw technique of cooperative learning method on sixth grade students’ achievement in teaching computer literacy lesson.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:While the experimental group (n=33) instructed with jigsaw technique of cooperative learning method, the control group (n=22) followed the regular curriculum with traditional instructional methods.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, no significant difference found between the groups on retention test scores.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Cooperative Learning · Computer Literacy · Jigsaw Technique

Özet

Öz The main purpose of this empirical study was to investigate the effect of using jigsaw technique of cooperative learning method on sixth grade students’ achievement in teaching computer literacy lesson. Fifty five sixth grade students from two class of a public school in Turkey participated in this study. With a quasi-experimental pretest–post-test research design, one class assign to experimental and the other to control group randomly. While the experimental group (n=33) instructed with jigsaw technique of cooperative learning method, the control group (n=22) followed the regular curriculum with traditional instructional methods. Both groups were administered to an achievement test, as pre, post and retention test. A t-test analysis was used to analyses research data. The results of post-test indicated that students in experimental group had significantly higher achievement scores than students in the control group. However, no significant difference found between the groups on retention test scores.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tekdal, M., SÖNMEZ, S. (2018). The Effect of Using Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Technique in Teaching Computer Literacy on Students’ Achievement and Retention. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 37–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/6144

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Aronson, E. (2002). Building empathy, compassion, and achievement in the jigsaw classroom. Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education, 209-225.
  2. Artut, P. D., & Tarim, K. (2007). The effectiveness of jigsaw II on prospective elementary school teachers. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 129-141.
  3. Berger, R., & Hänze, M. (2015). Impact of expert teaching quality on novice academic performance in the jigsaw cooperative learning method. International Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 294-320.
  4. Doymus, K. (2008). Teaching chemical bonding through jigsaw cooperative learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 47-57.
  5. Gömleksiz, M. N. (2007). Effectiveness of cooperative learning (jigsaw II) method in teaching English as a foreign language to engineering students (Case of Firat University, Turkey). European journal of engineering education, 32(5), 613-625. Hänze, M., & Berger, R. (2007). Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade physics classes. Learning and instruction, 17(1), 29-41.
  6. Holubec, E., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1993). Impact of cooperative learning on naval air traffic controller training. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(3), 337-346.
  7. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into practice, 38(2), 67-73.
  8. Keser, H., & Teker, N. (2011). The Study of Developments in Computer Education in Turkey between 1960-1988. Elementary Education Online, 10(3), 1010-1027.
  9. Küçükahmet, L. (1997). Eğitim programları ve öğretim. Ankara:
  10. Gazi Kitabevi.
  11. Lazarowitz, R. (1995). Learning science in cooperative modes in junior and senior high schools: Cognitive and affective outcomes. Secondary schools and cooperative learning: Theories, models, and strategies, 185-227.
  12. Mari, J. S., & Gumel, S. A. (2015). Effects of jigsaw model of cooperative learning on self-efficacy and achievement in chemistry among concrete and formal reasoners in colleges of education in Nigeria. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(3), 196. Mengduo, Q., & Xiaoling, J. (2010). Jigsaw Strategy as a Cooperative Learning Technique: Focusing on the Language Learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press), 33(4). Olukayode, A. S., & Salako, E. T. (2014). Effect of Jigsaw Technique and Gender on Stu