Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2009 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3

Factors affecting quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease

Sayfa
343–351
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Effective public health interventions should be aimed at improving QOL, especially in the most vulnerable groups.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: Cardiovascular diseases are currently the most common cause of death worldwide and associated with significant impairment of quality of life (QOL).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: The study population was composed of 85 patients diagnosed with stable CHD.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Effective public health interventions should be aimed at improving QOL, especially in the most vulnerable groups.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Coronary heart disease · quality of life · social support

Özet

Background: Cardiovascular diseases are currently the most common cause of death worldwide and associated with significant impairment of quality of life (QOL). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the QOL patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) in our country and the factors associated with QOL in these patients. Materials and Methods: The study population was composed of 85 patients diagnosed with stable CHD. The data were collected using Ferrans and Powers' Quality of Life Index Cardiac Version- IV and the query designed by the investigators. Results: Eighty-five patients (29 female, 56 male; ages between 38 and 72 years) were enrolled in this study. Married patients and those with greater incomes had greater QOL scores. Patients who had difficulties in daily works due to cardiac problems had lower QOL. Interestingly, patients with previous coronary intervention or surgey had similar QOL scores compared to those without. Patients who got emotional and social support had a greater social/economic score and who were able to get tangible social support had a higher global QOL score. Independent variables affecting the global QOL were marital and financial status, prior myocardial infarction (MI), and having difficulty in daily works. Conclusion: Marital and financial status, prior MI, and having difficulty in daily works are the main determinants for the QOL in patients with CHD. Social support may increase the effectiveness of their rehabilitation and psychosocial activity, thereby QOL. Effective public health interventions should be aimed at improving QOL, especially in the most vulnerable groups.

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular diseases are currently the most common cause of death worldwide and associated with significant impairment of quality of life (QOL). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the QOL patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) in our country and the factors associated with QOL in these patients. Materials and Methods: The study population was composed of 85 patients diagnosed with stable CHD. The data were collected using Ferrans and Powers' Quality of Life Index Cardiac Version- IV and the query designed by the investigators. Results: Eighty-five patients (29 female, 56 male; ages between 38 and 72 years) were enrolled in this study. Married patients and those with greater incomes had greater QOL scores. Patients who had difficulties in daily works due to cardiac problems had lower QOL. Interestingly, patients with previous coronary intervention or surgey had similar QOL scores compared to those without. Patients who got emotional and social support had a greater social/economic score and who were able to get tangible social support had a higher global QOL score. Independent variables affecting the global QOL were marital and financial status, prior myocardial infarction (MI), and having difficulty in daily works. Conclusion: Marital and financial status, prior MI, and having difficulty in daily works are the main determinants for the QOL in patients with CHD. Social support may increase the effectiveness of their rehabilitation and psychosocial activity, thereby QOL. Effective public health interventions should be aimed at improving QOL, especially in the most vulnerable groups.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAYRAM, A. N., KELEŞ, T., DURMAZ, T., ÖZDEMİR, Ö., ÖZDEMİR, A. B., BOZKURT, E. (2022). Factors affecting quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3, 343–351. https://ajindex.com/articles/611730

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Canli ZO, Akdemir N. The validity and reliability of the study on “Ferrans and Powers’ quality of life scale” in the patients who had myocardial infarction. MN Kardiyoloji 2003; 10: 111-20. 9. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health related quality of life. JAMA 1995; 273: 59-65.
  2. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health- related quality of life. JAMA 1995; 273: 59-65.
  3. Applegate WB, Miller ST, Graney MJ, Elam JT, Burns R, Akins DE. A randomized, controlled trial of a geriatric assessment unit in a community rehabilitation hospital. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1572-8.
  4. Liem PH, Chernof FR, Carter WJ. Geriatric rehabilitation unit: a 3-year outcome evaluation. J Gerontol 1986; 41: 44-50.
  5. Unsar S, Sut N, Durna Z. Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2007; 22: 501-7.
  6. Westin L, Carlsson R, Israelsson B, Willenheimer R, Cline C, McNeil TF. Quality of life in patients with ischaemic heart disease: a prospective controlled study. J Intern Med 1997; 242: 239-47.
  7. Eski S, Fesci H. Miyokard İnfarktüsü geçiren bireylerde yaşam kalitesinin belirlenmesi. Hemşirelik Araştırma Dergisi 2002; 4: 15-28.
  8. Gjeilo KH, Wahba A, Klepstad P, Lydersen S, Stenseth R. Health-related quality of life three years after coronary surgery: a comparison with the general population. Scand Cardiovasc J 2006; 40: 29-36.
  9. Westin L, Carlsson R, Erhardt L, Cantor-Graae E, McNeil T. Differences in quality of life in men and women with ischemic heart disease. A prospective controlled study. Scand Cardiovasc J 1999; 33: 160-5.
  10. Christian AH, Cheema AF, Smith SC, Mosca L. Predictors of quality of life among women with coronary heart disease. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 363-73.
  11. Luttik ML, Jaarsma T, Veeger N, van Veldhuisen DJ. Marital status, quality of life, and clinical outcome in patients with heart failure. Heart Lung 2006; 35: 3-8.
  12. Blom M, Georgiades A, László KD, Alinaghizadeh H, Janszky I, Ahnve S. Work and marital status in relation to depressive symptoms and social support among women with coronary artery disease. J Womens Health 2007; 16: 1305-16.
  13. Verrill D, Barton C, Beasley W, Brennan M, Lippard M, King C. Quality of life measures and gender comparisons in North Canadian Cardiac rehabilitation programs. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2001; 21: 37-46.
  14. Luckarinen H, Hentinen M. Assesment of quality of life the Nottingham health profile among patients with coronary heart disease, Journal of Advanced Nursing Blackwell Ltd