KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 4

Relation between foot pain and plantar pressure in pregnancy

Tuncay VAROL
Serkan ÖZGÜR
Enis CEZAYİRLİ
Aslı GÖKER
Ayşe TUÇ YÜCEL
Sayfa
1104–1108
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A cut-off value of 2.95 was taken to divide the subjects into two groups: Group 1 (n = 70) with VAS scores of

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: Hormonal and structural changes that occur during pregnancy cause alterations in body biomechanics.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:These alterations reach their peak in the last trimester.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A cut-off value of 2.95 was taken to divide the subjects into two groups: Group 1 (n = 70) with VAS scores of
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: Hormonal and structural changes that occur during pregnancy cause alterations in body biomechanics. These alterations reach their peak in the last trimester. Adaptive changes that appear in the foot result in pain in the foot and ankle. Pedobarography is a noninvasive measurement method that can be used to understand the origin of such pain. Materials and methods: One hundred and thirty-one pregnant women who did not have a foot or ankle problem prior to pregnancy volunteered to take part in the study. Pain was quantified by a visual analog scale (VAS). A cut-off value of 2.95 was taken to divide the subjects into two groups: Group 1 (n = 70) with VAS scores of

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

VAROL, T., ÖZGÜR, S., CEZAYİRLİ, E., GÖKER, A., YÜCEL, A. T. (2022). Relation between foot pain and plantar pressure in pregnancy. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 4, 1104–1108. https://ajindex.com/articles/610515

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Lymbery JK, Gilleard W. The stance phase of walking during late pregnancy: temporospatial and ground reaction force variables. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2005; 95: 247-253
  2. Birtane M, Tuna H. The evaluation of plantar pressure distribution in obese and non-obese adults. Clin Biomech 2004; 19: 1055-1059
  3. Nyska M, Sofer D, Porat A, Howard CB, Levi A, Meizner I. Planter foot pressures in pregnant women. Isr J Med Sci 1997; 33: 139-146
  4. Marnach ML, Ramin KD, Ramsey PS, Song SW, Stensland JJ, An KN. Characterization of the relationship between joint laxity and maternal hormones in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 331-335
  5. Calguneri M, Bird HA, Wright V. Changes in joint laxity occurring during pregnancy. Ann Rheum Dis 1982; 41: 126- 128
  6. Foti T, Davids JR, Bagley A. A biomechanical analysis of gait during pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg 2000; 82: 625-632
  7. Ponnapula P, Boberg JS. Lower extremity changes experienced during pregnancy. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010; 49: 452-458
  8. Kristiansson P, Svardsudd K, von Schoultz B. Back pain during pregnancy: a prospective study. Spine 1996; 21: 702-709
  9. Hawke F, Burns J. Understanding the nature and mechanism of foot pain. J Foot Ankle Res 2009; 2: 1
  10. Vullo VJ, Richardson JK, Hurvitz EA. Hip, knee, and foot pain during pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Fam Pract 1996; 43: 63-68
  11. Wetz HH, Hentschel J, Drerup B, Kiesel L, Osada N, Veltmann U. Changes in shape and size of the foot during pregnancy. Orthopade 2006; 35: 1124-1130 (in German with abstract in English)
  12. Segal NA, Boyer ER, Teran-Yengle P, Glass NA, Hillstrom HJ, Yack HJ. Pregnancy leads to lasting changes in foot structure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 92: 232-240
  13. Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: S17-S24
  14. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8: 1153-1157
  15. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthrit Care Res 2011; 63 (Suppl. 11): S240-252
  16. Bailey B, Gravel J, Daoust R. Reliability of the visual analog scale in children with acute pain in the emergency department. Pa