Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6

Can we predict patients that will not benefit from invasive mechanical ventilation? A novel scoring system in intensive care: the IMV Mortality Prediction Score (IMPRES

Sayfa
1662–1673
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study devised a new scoring system for decision-making for critically ill patients as to whether they need to be intubatedor not and presents a rapid and accurate prediction of mortality and prognosis prior to ICU admission using simple clinical data.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: The present study aimed to define the clinical and laboratory criteria for predicting patients that will not benefit frominvasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) treatment and determine the prediction of mortality and prognosis of these critical ill patients.Materials and methods: The study was designed as an observational, multicenter, prospective, and cross-sectional clinical study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It wasconducted by 75 researchers at 41 centers in intensive care units (ICUs) located in various geographical areas of Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study devised a new scoring system for decision-making for critically ill patients as to whether they need to be intubatedor not and presents a rapid and accurate prediction of mortality and prognosis prior to ICU admission using simple clinical data.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background/aim: The present study aimed to define the clinical and laboratory criteria for predicting patients that will not benefit frominvasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) treatment and determine the prediction of mortality and prognosis of these critical ill patients.Materials and methods: The study was designed as an observational, multicenter, prospective, and cross-sectional clinical study. It wasconducted by 75 researchers at 41 centers in intensive care units (ICUs) located in various geographical areas of Turkey. It included a totalof 1463 ICU patients who were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) treatment. A total of 158 parameters were examinedvia logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for mortality; using these data, the IMV Mortality Prediction Score(IMPRES) scoring system was developed.Results: The following cut-off scores were used to indicate mortality risk: 8, very highrisk. There was a 26.8% mortality rate among the 254 patients who had a total IMPRES score of lower than 2. The mortality rate was93.3% for patients with total IMPRES scores of greater than 8 (P < 0.001).Conclusion: The present study included a large number of patients from various geographical areas of the country who were admittedto various types of ICUs, had diverse diagnoses and comorbidities, were intubated with various indications in either urgent or electivesettings, and were followed by physicians from various specialties. Therefore, our data are more general and can be applied to a broaderpopulation. This study devised a new scoring system for decision-making for critically ill patients as to whether they need to be intubatedor not and presents a rapid and accurate prediction of mortality and prognosis prior to ICU admission using simple clinical data.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYA, A., KIRAKLI, C., KÜÇÜK, M. P., YARAR, E., AKSOY, H. B., DİKİŞ, Ö. Ş., ÇELİK, H. K., ÖZKAN, S., ÖZLÜ, T., KÜÇÜK, A. O. (2022). Can we predict patients that will not benefit from invasive mechanical ventilation? A novel scoring system in intensive care: the IMV Mortality Prediction Score (IMPRES. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6, 1662–1673. https://ajindex.com/articles/610167

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Azoulay E, Mokart D, Pene F, Lambert J, Kouatchet A et al. Outcomes of critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies: prospective multicenter data from France and Belgium--A Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Reanimation Onco-hematologique study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2013; 31 (22): 2810-2818
  2. Bird GT, Farquhar-Smith P, Wigmore T, Potter M, Gruber PC. Outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with haematological malignancy admitted to a specialist cancer intensive care unit: a 5 yr study. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2012; 108 (3): 452-459
  3. Soares M, Caruso P, Silva E, Teles JM, Lobo SM et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer requiring admission to intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. Critical Care Medicine 2010; 38 (1): 9-15
  4. Soares M, Salluh JI, Spector N, Rocco JR. Characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support for >24 hrs. Critical Care Medicine 2005; 33 (3): 520- 526
  5. Staudinger T, Stoiser B, Mullner M, Locker GJ, Laczika K et al. Outcome and prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine 2000; 28 (5): 1322-1328
  6. Cohen CA, Zagelbaum G, Gross D, Roussos C, Macklem PT. Clinical manifestations of inspiratory muscle fatigue. American Journal of Medicine 1982; 73 (3): 308-316
  7. Slutsky AS. Mechanical ventilation. American College of Chest Physicians’ Consensus Conference. Chest 1993; 104 (6): 1833- 1859
  8. Powers SK, Kavazis AN, Levine S. Prolonged mechanical ventilation alters diaphragmatic structure and function. Critical Care Medicine 2009; 37 (10 Suppl.): 347
  9. Danis M, Devita M, Baily M, Beyda D, Chalfin D et al. Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Critical Care Medicine 1997; 25 (5): 887-891
  10. No authors listed.] Consensus report on the ethics of foregoing lifesustaining treatments in the critically ill. Task Force on Ethics of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Critical Care Medicine 1990; 18: 1435-1439
  11. Santonocito C, Ristagno G, Gullo A, Weil MH. Do-notresuscitate order: a view throughout the world. Journal of Critical Care 2013; 28 (1): 14-21
  12. Blank RH, Merrick JC. End-of-life Decision Making: A CrossNational Study. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press; 2005
  13. Azoulay E, Pene F, Darmon M, Lengline E, Benoit D et al. Managing critically ill hematolo