KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2012 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Genetic diversity of common bean (phaseolus vulgaris l.) landraces grown in Northeast Anatolia of Turkey assessed with simple sequence repeat markers

Murat AYDIN
Erdal ELKOCA
Kamil HALILOGLU
Maya Izar KHAIDIZAR
Faik KANTAR
Sayfa
145–150
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Considerable variation existed within the genotypes collected from Northeast Anatolia Region and registered cultivars that can be exploited for breeding programs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker system was used to analyze the genetic diversity of 38 common bean landraces grown in Northern Anatolia Region and their relationship to twelve nationally registered cultivars.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 72 DNA fragments across all materials were scored using 30 primers pairs.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Considerable variation existed within the genotypes collected from Northeast Anatolia Region and registered cultivars that can be exploited for breeding programs.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker system was used to analyze the genetic diversity of 38 common bean landraces grown in Northern Anatolia Region and their relationship to twelve nationally registered cultivars. A total of 72 DNA fragments across all materials were scored using 30 primers pairs. More than 97% of the amplification products showed polymorphism, indicating high variation at the DNA level among these accessions. Pair-wise genetic similarity ranged from 0.218 to 0.759, with a mean of 0.585. Based on the SSR markers, two major clusters were formed of 50 genotypes investigated. A majority of the commercial cultivars (66.6%) and landrace accessions (84.2%) were clustered into second group, whereas, small portion of commercial cultivars (33.4%) and landrace accessions (15.7%) were clustered in to first group. A Mantel's test showed significant correlation between SSR distance matrix and cophenetic matrices. Considerable variation existed within the genotypes collected from Northeast Anatolia Region and registered cultivars that can be exploited for breeding programs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYDIN, M., ELKOCA, E., HALILOGLU, K., KHAIDIZAR, M. I., KANTAR, F. (2022). Genetic diversity of common bean (phaseolus vulgaris l.) landraces grown in Northeast Anatolia of Turkey assessed with simple sequence repeat markers. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 145–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/605864

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Balkaya, A., 1999. A Research on Collection of Genetic Resources, Determination of Phenological and Morphological Characteristics and Selection of Suitable Types for Fresh Consumption by Pedigree Selection in Green Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in the Black Sea Region. PhD Thesis, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. Balkaya, A., R. Yanmaz, 2002. Morphological properties of cultivar nominates selected Black Sea Region bean populations and identification by protein markers. Ankara Univ. J. Agric. Sci. 9: 182-188.
  2. Blair M.W., F. Pedraza, H.F. Buendia, E. Gaitan-Solis, 2003. Development of a genome-wide anchored microsatellite map for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 1362-1374.
  3. Blair, M.W., M.C. Giraldo, H.F. Buendia, E. Tovar, M.C. Duque, S.E. Beebe, 2006. Microsatellite marker diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 113: 100-109.
  4. Buso, G.S.C., Z.P.S. Amaral, R.P.V. Brondani, M.E. Ferreira, 2006. Primer note: microsatellite markers for the common bean Phaseolus vulgaris. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 252– 254. Dellaporta, S.L., J. Wood, J.B. Hicks, 1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 1: 19-21.
  5. Elkoca, E., K. Haliloglu, F. Kantar, C. Eken, F. Donmez, M. Aydin, 2010. Genetic diversity of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown in the northeast region of Turkey based on morphological traits. 5th International Food Legumes Research Conference (IFLRC V) & 7th European Conference on Grain Legumes (AEP VII), Legumes for Global Health, Legume Crops and Products for Food, Feed and Environmental Benefits, 26-30 April, 2010,
  6. Antalya, Turkey, pp: 36. FAO, 2010. http://faostat.fao.org/
  7. Gaitan-Solis E., M.C. Duque, K.J. Edwards, J. Tohme, 2002. Microsatellite repeats in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): Isolation, characterization, and cross-species amplification in Phaseolus ssp. Crop Sci. 42: 2128-2136.
  8. Gomez, O.J., M.W. Blair, B.E. Frankow-Lindberg, U. Gullberg, 2005. Comparative study of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces conserved ex situ in genebanks and in situ by farmers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 371-380.
  9. Kandemir, N., G. Yılmaz, Y.B. Karan, D. Borazan, 2010. Isolation of different genotypes in ‘başçiftlik beyazı’ potato landrace using ssr markers. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 15(1): 84-88.
  10. Lioi, L., A.R. Piergiovanni, D. Pignone, S. Puglisi, M. Santantonio, G. Sonnante, 2005. Genetic diversity of some surviving on-farm Italian co