These results indicated that understanding of factors such as biofertilizer, mineral fertilizer and environment will enable us to use biofertilizer as an alternative to mineral fertilizer to optimize productivity and sustainability of pea production
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The interest in the use of biofertilizer as alternative to mineral fertilizer increase continuously due to increasing mineral fertilizer cost and heavy metal accumulation in the soil such as cadmium.The objective of this study was to assess the effects of four biofertilizer (N2-fixing, P-solubilizing, N2 fixing-P solubilizing, commercial biofertilizer) with and without mineral phosphorus fertilizer on yield and quality of forage pea(Pisumsativum spp. arvense L.).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The application of biofertilizeraffected significantly dry matter yield (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and phosphorus contain.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These results indicated that understanding of factors such as biofertilizer, mineral fertilizer and environment will enable us to use biofertilizer as an alternative to mineral fertilizer to optimize productivity and sustainability of pea production
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
The interest in the use of biofertilizer as alternative to mineral fertilizer increase continuously due to increasing mineral fertilizer cost and heavy metal accumulation in the soil such as cadmium.The objective of this study was to assess the effects of four biofertilizer (N2-fixing, P-solubilizing, N2 fixing-P solubilizing, commercial biofertilizer) with and without mineral phosphorus fertilizer on yield and quality of forage pea(Pisumsativum spp. arvense L.). The application of biofertilizeraffected significantly dry matter yield (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and phosphorus contain. The use of mineral fertilizer increased only dry matter yield. The effect of biofertilizer on pea yield and quality varied significantly depending on year. These results indicated that understanding of factors such as biofertilizer, mineral fertilizer and environment will enable us to use biofertilizer as an alternative to mineral fertilizer to optimize productivity and sustainability of pea production
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
KOC, A., GULLAP, M. K., HALILOGLU, K., ERKOVAN, H. I. (2022). SUBSTITUTION POSSIBILITY OF SOME BIOFERTILIZERS FOR MINERAL PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER IN PEA CULTIVATION. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 175–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/605800
Anonymous. 1995. Acid detergent and neutral detergent fiber using ANKOM’s fiber analyzer F200. Ankom Technology Corporation, Fairport, NY. Acikgoz, E., V. Katkat, S. Omeroglu and B. Okan. 1985.Mineral elements and amino acid concentrations in field pea and common vetch herbages and seeds. J Agron and Crop Sci. 55: 179-185.
Al-Fayiz, Y.S., M.M. El-Garawany, F.N. Assubaie and M.A. AlEed. 2007.Impact of phosphate fertilizer on cadmium accumulation in soil and vegetable crops. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 78: 358-362.
Avila, F.W., V. Faquin, J.L. Araujo, D.J. Marques, P.M.R. Junior, A.K.S. Labato, S.J. Ramos and D.P. Baliza. 2011. Phosphate supply affects phosphorus nutrition and biochemical responses in maize plants. Australian J Crop Sci. 5: 646-653.
Cakmakci, R., M. Erat, U. Erdogan and M.F. Donmez. 2007. The influence of plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria on growth and enzyme activities in wheat and spinach plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci170:288–295.
Cakmakci, R., M.F. Donmez and U. Erdogan. 2007. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on barley seedling growth, nutrient uptake, some soil properties, and bacterial counts. Turk J Agric For. 31: 189-199.
Dasci, M., M.K. Gullap, H.I. Erkovan and A. Koc. 2010.Effects of phosphorus fertilizer and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria applications on clover dominant meadow: II. Chemical composition. Turkish J Field Crops 15: 18-24.
Elkoca, E., F. Kantar and F.Sahin. 2008. Influence of nitrogen and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on the nodulation, plant growth and yield of chickpea. J Plant Nutrition 31: 157–171.
Elkoca, E., M. Turan and M.F. Donmez. 2010. Effect of single, dual and triple inoculations with bacillus subtilus, bacillus megaterium and rhizobium leguminosarum by Phasoli on nodulation, nutrient uptake, yield and yield parameters of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Elkoca-05’). J Plant Nutrition 33: 2104-2119.
Erkovan, H.I., M.K. Gullap, M. Dasci and A. Koc. 2010. Effects of phosphorus fertilizer and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria application on clover dominant meadow: I. Hay yield and botanical composition. Turkish J Field Crops 15: 12-17.
Glick, B.R., D.M. Penrose and J. Li. 1998. A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growthpromoting bacteria. J Theor Biol. 190: 63-68.
Halder, A.K., A.K. Mishra and P.K. Chakrabartty. 1990. Solubilization of phosphatic compounds by Rhizobium. Indian J Microbiol. 30: 311-314.