Dergiler / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2014 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Effects of row spacing and seeding rate on hay and seed yield of eastern anatolian forage Pea (pisum sativum ssp. arvense l.) ecotype

Sayfa
96–100
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the results of the present study and under Erzurumconditions, it was recommended that the Eastern Anatolian forage pea ecotype should be cultivated with 40 cmrow spacing and 120 kg ha -1 seeding rate for hay yield and with 40 cm row spacing and 90 kg ha -1 seeding ratefor seed yield.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The Eastern Anatolian forage pea ecotype generally has a thin stem, small leaves and small seeds.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The ecotypeis different from the improved breeds and thus cultural techniques for this ecotype are somehow different.Current study was conducted to investigate the effects of row spacing and seeding rate on yield and some othercharacteristics of the Eastern Anatolian forage pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) ecotype.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the results of the present study and under Erzurumconditions, it was recommended that the Eastern Anatolian forage pea ecotype should be cultivated with 40 cmrow spacing and 120 kg ha -1 seeding rate for hay yield and with 40 cm row spacing and 90 kg ha -1 seeding ratefor seed yield.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The Eastern Anatolian forage pea ecotype generally has a thin stem, small leaves and small seeds. The ecotypeis different from the improved breeds and thus cultural techniques for this ecotype are somehow different.Current study was conducted to investigate the effects of row spacing and seeding rate on yield and some othercharacteristics of the Eastern Anatolian forage pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) ecotype. Experiments werecarried out in randomised complete blocks design with three replications under irrigated conditions ofErzurum during the years 2010 and 2011. Three different row spacing (20, 40 and 60 cm) and four differentseeding rates (60, 90, 120 and 150 kg ha -1) were used in experiments. Hay yield, hay crude protein, ADF andNDF ratios, seed yield, straw yield, biological yield and harvest index parameters were investigated in thisstudy. Results can be summarised as follows: Row spacing and seeding rate had significant effects on drymatter and seed yield of the forage pea. Based on the results of the present study and under Erzurumconditions, it was recommended that the Eastern Anatolian forage pea ecotype should be cultivated with 40 cmrow spacing and 120 kg ha -1 seeding rate for hay yield and with 40 cm row spacing and 90 kg ha -1 seeding ratefor seed yield.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAN, M., KURSUN, K. K., DUMLU, Z. G. (2022). Effects of row spacing and seeding rate on hay and seed yield of eastern anatolian forage Pea (pisum sativum ssp. arvense l.) ecotype. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 96–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/605796

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Acıkgoz, E. 2001.
  2. Forage Crops. Uludag Bursa, Turkey, 584 p. Bozo g lu, H., E. Pesken, A. G u lu mser. 2004. Effect of row spacing and potassium humate application on yield and some traits of peas. Ankara Univ. Faculty of Agric., Journal of Agric. Sci., 10 (1): 53 -58. Chayferous, C., F. Okuyucu. 1987. Studies on effects of row spacings on yield and other some characters of two different forage pea (Pisum arvense L.). Journal of Ege Univ. Faculty of Agric., 25: 3, Izmir. Deniz, O. 1967.
  3. Crude Protein, Digestible Nutrients, Calcium and Phosphorus Content of Forage Pea. Livestock and Grassland Research Institute, Ayyildiz Pub. Inc., Ankara, 91 p. Girgel, U. 2006. A Research on the Yield Components of Different Sowing Densities on Bolero Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Cultivars under the Kahramanmaras Conditions. S u tcu Imam Univ. Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Msc Thesis, Kahramanmaras. Inan c, S. 2007. The Effects of Different Row Spacings on the Yield and Yield Components in Pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense ). Yuzuncu Yil Univ. Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Msc Thesis, Van. Johnston, A.M., G.W. Clayton, G.P. Lafond, K.N. Harker, T.J. Hogg, E.N. Johnson, W.E. May, J.T. McConnell. 2002. Field pea seeding management. Canadian J. Plant Sci., 82: 639 - 644. Juskiw, P.E., J.H. Helma, D.F. Salmona. 2000. Forage yield and quality for monocrops and mixtures of small grain cereals. Crop Sci., 40 (1): 138 -147. Martin, I.J., L. Tenoria, L. Ayerbe. 1994. Yield, growth and water use of conventional and semi leafless peas in semiarid environments. Crop Sci., 34: 1576 -1583. Potts, J.M. 1980. The influence of sowing date, harvest date and seed rate on the yield of forage peas. Grass and Forage Sc ience, 35: 41 -45. S enel, M. 1958. Variety screening for vinter vetches (1934 - 1954). Experimental Research Station of Adana, Ministry of Agriculture, Technical Bul: No: 5, Adana, Turkey. Tan, M., Y. Serin. 2008. Forage Legumes. Ataturk Univ. Faculty of Agric. Publ. No: 190, Erzurum, Turkey. Tan, M., A. Koc, Z. Dumlu Gul. 2012. Morphological characteristics and seed yield of East Anatolian local forage pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) ecotypes. Turkish Journal of Crop Sci., 17(1): 24 -30. Tu rk, M., S. A lbayrak, O. Y u ksel. 2011. Effect of seeding rate on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 16(2): 137 -14. Uzun, A., E. Acikgoz. 1998. Effect of sowing season and seeding rate on the