Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Orthogonal signal correction- partial least squares method for simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of nickel, cobalt, and zinc

Sayfa
217–228
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This procedure allows the simultaneous determination of nickel, cobalt, and zinc in synthetic and real samples and good reliability of the determination was proved.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The simultaneous determination of nickel, cobalt, and zinc mixtures by spectrophotometric method is a difficult problem in analytical chemistry, due to spectral interferences.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, the calibration model is based on absorption spectra in the 450-600 nm range for 21 different mixtures of nickel, cobalt, and zinc.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This procedure allows the simultaneous determination of nickel, cobalt, and zinc in synthetic and real samples and good reliability of the determination was proved.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The simultaneous determination of nickel, cobalt, and zinc mixtures by spectrophotometric method is a difficult problem in analytical chemistry, due to spectral interferences. By multivariate calibration methods, such as partial least squares (PLS) regression, it is possible to obtain a model adjusted to the concentration values of the mixtures used in the calibration range. Orthogonal signal correction (OSC) is a preprocessing technique used for removing the information unrelated to the target variables based on constrained principal component analysis. OSC is a suitable preprocessing method for partial least squares calibration of mixtures without loss of prediction capacity using spectrophotometric method. In this study, the calibration model is based on absorption spectra in the 450-600 nm range for 21 different mixtures of nickel, cobalt, and zinc. Calibration matrices were formed from samples containing 0.025- 0.55, 0.025-0.50, and 0.025-0.50 $mu g mL^{−1}$ for nickel, cobalt, and zinc, respectively. The RMSEP for nickel, cobalt, and zinc with OSC and without OSC were 0.0127, 0.0101, and 0.0145, and 0.0045, 0.0049, and 0.0058 $mu g mL^{−1}$, respectively. This procedure allows the simultaneous determination of nickel, cobalt, and zinc in synthetic and real samples and good reliability of the determination was proved.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AZIZI, A., NIAZI, A. (2022). Orthogonal signal correction- partial least squares method for simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of nickel, cobalt, and zinc. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 217–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/602156

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (28)

  1. B. Rezaei and E. Rezaei, J. Anal. Chem. 61, 262-265 (2006)
  2. Q.F. Hu, X.H. Wu, G.Y. Yang, Z.J. Huang and J.Y. Yin, J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 52, 277-282 (2005)
  3. C. Zhang, J. Miura and Y. Nagaosa, Anal. Sci. 21, 1105-1110 (2005)
  4. K.S. Rao, T. Balaji, T.P. Rao, Y. Babu and G.R.K. Naida, Spectrochim. Acta Part B 57, 1333-1338 (2002)
  5. H. Bag, A.R. Turker, R. Cokun, M. Sacak and M. Yigitoglu, Spectrochim. Acta Part B 55, 1101-1108 (2000)
  6. N. Lavi and Z.B. Alfassi, Analyst 115, 817-822 (1990)
  7. D.M. Haaland and E.V. Thomas, Anal. Chem. 60, 1193-1202 (1988)
  8. P. Geladi and B.R. Kowalski, Anal. Chim. Acta 185, 1-17 (1986)
  9. H. Wold, “Research Papers in Statistics”, Wiley, New York, 1966
  10. J. Ghasemi, A. Nikrahi and A. Niazi, Turk. J. Chem. 29, 669-678 (2005)
  11. A. Niazi, J. Ghasemi and A. Yazdanipour, Anal. Lett. 38, 2377-2392 (2005)
  12. A. Niazi and M. Sadeghi, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 54, 711-713 (2006)
  13. A. Niazi, Croa. Chim. Acta 79, 573-579 (2006)
  14. A. Niazi, N. Ghasemi, M. Goodarzi and A. Ebadi, J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 54, 411-418 (2007)
  15. A. Niazi, J. Ghasemi and M. Zendehdel, Talanta 74, 247-254 (2007)
  16. A. Niazi, S. Jamehbozorghi and D. Nori-Shargh, Turk. J. Chem. 30, 619-628 (2006)
  17. A. Niazi, S. Jamehbozorghi and D. Nori-Shargh, J. Hazard. Meter. 151, 603-609 (2008)
  18. S. Wold, H. Antii, F. Lindgren and J. Ohman, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 44, 175-185 (1998)
  19. J. Sjoblom, O. Svensson, M. Josefson, H. Kullberg and S. Wold, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 44, 229-244 (1998)
  20. C.A. Andersson, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 47, 51-63 (1999)
  21. T. Fearn, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 50, 47-52 (2000)
  22. J. Ghasemi and A. Niazi, Talanta 65, 1168-1173 (2005)
  23. A. Niazi, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 17, 1020-1026 (2006)
  24. A. Niazi and A. Yazdanipour, J. Hazard. Mater. 146, 421-427 (2007)
  25. J.J. Lurie, “Handbook of Analytical Chemistry”, Mir Publishers, Moscow, 1978
  26. E. Morgan, “Chemometrics: Experimental Design”, Wiley, New York, 1997
  27. A. Lorber, K. Faber and B.R. Kowalski, Anal. Chem. 69, 1620-1626 (1997)
  28. J. Ferre and K. Faber, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 69, 123-136 (2003).