Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 4

CO2adsorption behavior and kinetics on chemically modi ed activated carbons

Sayfa
576–587
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

When the whole adsorption data rangeis considered, the adsorption cannot be explained by any model at 25◦C due to the complex nature of the adsorbents,but the adsorption behavior ts rather well to pseudo- rst order kinetics at 120◦C for the alkali-impregnated samples.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:CO2adsorption capacities of activated carbon-based adsorbents subjected to different treatments, such asHNO3oxidation, air oxidation, alkali impregnation, and heat treatment under helium gas atmosphere, were determinedby gravimetric analyses and reported previously by our group.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The best ts were obtained to the D-R equation, indicating competitive or multilayer CO2adsorption occurringin the micropores of the adsorbents.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:When the whole adsorption data rangeis considered, the adsorption cannot be explained by any model at 25◦C due to the complex nature of the adsorbents,but the adsorption behavior ts rather well to pseudo- rst order kinetics at 120◦C for the alkali-impregnated samples.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

CO2adsorption capacities of activated carbon-based adsorbents subjected to different treatments, such asHNO3oxidation, air oxidation, alkali impregnation, and heat treatment under helium gas atmosphere, were determinedby gravimetric analyses and reported previously by our group. In the current work, the experimental adsorption isothermsof these modi ed activated carbon samples were tted to Langmuir, Freundlich, and Dubinin{Radushkevich (D-R)models. The best ts were obtained to the D-R equation, indicating competitive or multilayer CO2adsorption occurringin the micropores of the adsorbents. Air oxidation followed by alkali impregnation led to the highest micropore volume,ranging between 0.259 and 0.298 g.CO2/g.adsorbent, which resulted in the highest CO2adsorption capacity of 8.87%at 1 atm and 25◦C. The CO2adsorption kinetic plots revealed a two-step adsorption process for all the adsorbents: arelatively fast kinetic region phase followed by a slow one until reaching the equilibrium. Pseudo- rst and pseudo-secondorder kinetics explain adsorption for the kinetic region for most of the samples. When the whole adsorption data rangeis considered, the adsorption cannot be explained by any model at 25◦C due to the complex nature of the adsorbents,but the adsorption behavior ts rather well to pseudo- rst order kinetics at 120◦C for the alkali-impregnated samples.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇAĞLAYAN, B. S., AKSOYLU, A. E. (2022). CO2adsorption behavior and kinetics on chemically modi ed activated carbons. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 4, 576–587. https://ajindex.com/articles/602060

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Wilcox, J.Carbon Capture; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012. 2.Zhang, Z.; Xu, M.; Wang, H.; Li, Z.Chem. Eng. J.2010,160, 571-577. 3.Auta, M.; Amat Darbis, N. D.; Mohd Din, A. T.; Hameed, B. H.Chem. Eng. J.2013,233, 80-87. 4.Caglayan, B. S.; Aksoylu, A. E.J. Hazard. Mater.2013,252-253, 19-28. 5.Figueiredo, J. L.; Pereira, M. F. R.; Freitas, M. M. A.; Orfao, J. J. M.Carbon1999,37, 1379-1389. 6.Aksoylu, A. E.; Freitas, M. M. A.; Figueiredo, J. L.Appl. Catal. A2000,192, 29-42. 7.Plaza, M. G.; Pevida, C.; Arenillas, A.; Rrubiera, F.; Pis, J. J.Fuel2007,86, 2204-2212. 8.Shafeeyan, M. S.; Daud, W. M. A. W.; Houshmand, A.; Shamari, A.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis2010,89, 143-151. 9.Biniac, S.; Szymanski, G.; Siedlewski, J.; Swiatkowski, A.Carbon1997,35, 1799-1810. 10.Dastgheib, S. A.; Karan l, T.; Cheng, W.Carbon2004,42, 547-557. 11.Chen, W.; Cannon, F. S.; Rangel-Mendez, J. R.Carbon2005,43, 573-580. 12.Tan, Y. L.; Azharul Islam, M.; Asif, M.; Hameed, B. H.Energy2014,77, 926-931. 13.Lillo-Rodenas, M. A.; Cazorla-Amoros, D.; Linares-Solano, A.Carbon200341, 267-275. 14.Yong, Z.; Mata, V.; Rodrigues, A. E.Adsorption20017, 41-50. 15.Somy, A.; Mehrnia, M. R.; Amrei, H. D.; Ghanizadeh, A.; Safari, M. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control2009,3,249-254. 16.Song, H. K.; Lee, K. H.Sep. Sci. Technol.1998,33, 2039-2057. 17.Gil, A.; Grange, P.Colloid Surf. A1996,113, 39-50. 18.Daley, M. A.; Tandon, D.; Economy, J.; Hippo, E. J.Carbon1996,34, 1196-1200. 19.Carrott, P. J. M.; Ribeiro Carrott, M. M. L.; Suhas.Carbon2010,48, 4162-4168. 20.Mourao, P. A. M.; Carrott, P. J. M.; Ribeiro Carrott, M. M. L.Carbon2006,44, 2422-2429. 21.Nguyen, C.; Do, D. D.Carbon2001,39, 1327-1336. 22.Ushiki, I.; Ota, M.; Sato, Y.; Inomata, H.Fluid Phase Equilib.2013,344, 101-107. 23.Yan, X.; Komarneni, S.; Yan, Z.J. Colloid Interface Sci.2013,390, 217-224. 24.Burevski, D.Colloid Polym. Sci.1982,260, 623-627. 25.Caglayan, B. S.; Soykal, I. I.; Aksoylu, A. E.Appl. Catal. B2011,106, 540-549. 26.Shafeeyan, M. S.; Daud, W. M. A. W.; Shamiri, A.Chem. Eng. Res. Des.2014,92, 961-988. 27.Dantas, T. L. P; Luna, F. M. T.; Silva Jr., I. J.; de Azevedo, D. C. S.; Grande, C. A.; Rodrigues, A. E.; Moreira,R. F. P. M. Chem. Eng. J.2011,169, 11-19. 28.Tran, C. D.; Duri, S.; Delnri, A.; Franco, M.J. Hazard. Mater.2013,252-253, 355-366. 29.Borah, D.; Satokawa, S.; Kato, S.; Kojima, T.J. Hazard. Mater.2009,162, 1269-1277. 30.Pulido Melian, E.; Gonzalez Diaz, O.; Arana, J.; Dona Rodriguez, J. M.; Tello Rendon, E.; Herrera Melian, J.