Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

Heterogeneous Fenton-like degradation of Acid Red 17 using Fe-impregnatednanoporous clinoptilolite: arti cial neural network modeling andphytotoxicological studies

Sayfa
347–363
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thephytotoxicity of AR17 and its intermediate compounds formed in the Fenton process was evaluated using the aquaticspeciesLemna minor.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Heterogeneous Fenton-like removal of Acid Red 17 (AR17) from aqueous solution was investigated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The effects of ve operationalparameters, i.e. solution pH, H2O2dosage, catalyst loading, AR17 concentration, and reaction time, on the removalefficiency of AR17 were studied.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thephytotoxicity of AR17 and its intermediate compounds formed in the Fenton process was evaluated using the aquaticspeciesLemna minor.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Heterogeneous Fenton-like removal of Acid Red 17 (AR17) from aqueous solution was investigated. Fe-impregnated nanoporous clinoptilolite (Fe-NP-Clin) was prepared by an impregnation method and used as a catalyst. Acomplete characterization including X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanningelectron microscopy (SEM), inductively coupled plasma (ICP), and Brunauer{Emmett{Teller (BET) analyses was doneto describe the physical and chemical properties of NP-Clin and Fe-NP-Clin samples. The effects of ve operationalparameters, i.e. solution pH, H2O2dosage, catalyst loading, AR17 concentration, and reaction time, on the removalefficiency of AR17 were studied. For the rst time, an arti cial neural network (ANN) model with ve neurons at theinput layer, 14 layers in the hidden layer, and one neuron at the output layer was designed to predict the removal efficiencyof AR17. The correlation coefficient between the predicted results by the ANN model and experimental data was 0.993,demonstrating that the ANN could efficiently predict AR17 removal efficiency under different operating conditions. Thephytotoxicity of AR17 and its intermediate compounds formed in the Fenton process was evaluated using the aquaticspeciesLemna minor.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

FATHINIA, M., BOZORG, S., KHATAEE, A. (2022). Heterogeneous Fenton-like degradation of Acid Red 17 using Fe-impregnatednanoporous clinoptilolite: arti cial neural network modeling andphytotoxicological studies. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 347–363. https://ajindex.com/articles/602041

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Fathinia, M.; Khataee, A. R.; Zarei, M., Aber, S.J. Molecul. Catal. A-Chem.2010,333, 73-84. 2.Aghaeinejad-Meybodi, A.; Ebadi, A.; Sha ei, S.; Khataee, A., Rostampour, M.Environ. Technol.2015,36, 1477-1488. 3.Khataee, A. R.; Safarpour, M.; Naseri, A., Zarei, M.J. Electroanal. Chem.2012,672, 53-62. 4.Hammad Khan, M.; Jung, H. S.; Lee, W., Jung, J. Y.Environ. Technol.2013,34, 495-502. 5.Khataee, A.; Naseri, A.; Zarei, M.; Safarpour, M., Moradkhannejhad, L.Environ. Technol.2012,33, 2305-2317. 6.Khataee, A.; Bozorg, S.; Khorram, S.; Fathinia, M.; Hanifehpour, Y., Joo, S. W.Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.2013,52,18225-18233. 7.Doocey, D. J.; Sharratt, P. N.; Cundy, C. S., Plaisted, R. J.Process Saf. Environ.2004,82, 359-364. 8.Hwang, S.; Huling, S. G., Ko, S.Chemosphere2010,78, 563-568. 9.Iurascu, B.; Siminiceanu, I.; Vione, D.; Vicente, M. A., Gil, A.Water Res.2009,43, 1313-1322. 10.Chen, Q.; Wu, P.; Dang, Z.; Zhu, N.; Li, P.; Wu, J., Wang, X.Sep. Purif. Technol.2010,71, 315-323. 11.Ozcelik, Z.; Soylu, G. S. P., Boz, I.Chem. Eng. J.2009,155, 94-100. 12.Doula, M. K.Chemosphere2007,67, 731-740. 13.Dukkanci, M.; Gunduz, G.; Ylmaz, S., Prihoduko, R. V.J. Hazard. Mater.2010,181, 343-350. 14.Akgul, M., Karabakan, A.Micropor. Mesopor. Mat.2010,131, 238-244. 15.Chmielewska, E.; Samajova, E., Kozac, J.Turk. J. Chem.2002,26, 281-286. 16.Armbruster, T.Am. Mineral.1993,78, 260-264. 17.Navalon, S.; Alvaro, M., Garcia, H.Appl. Catal. B- Environ.2010,99, 1-26. 18.Khataee, A. R., Kasiri, M. B.J. Molecul. Catal. A-Chem.2010,331, 86-100. 19.Zheng, H.; Fang, S.; Lou, H.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, L., Lu, H.Expert. Syst. Appl.2011,38, 5591-5602. 20.Elmolla, E. S.; Chaudhuri, M., Eltoukhy, M. M.J. Hazard. Mater.2010,179, 127-134. 21.Salari, D.; Daneshvar, N.; Aghazadeh, F., Khataee, A. R.J. Hazard. Mater.2005,125, 205-210. 22.Gonzalez-Olmos, R.; Kopinke, F. D.; Mackenzie, K., Georgi, A.Environ. Sci. Technol.2013,47, 2353-2360. 23.Gonzalez-Olmos, R.; Martin, M. J.; Georgi, A.; Kopinke, F. D.; Oller, I., Malato, S.Appl. Catal. B- Environ.2012,125, 51-58. 24.Kragovic, M.; Dakovic, A.; Sekulic, Z.; Trgo, M.; Ugrina, M.; Peric, J.; Gatta, G. D.Appl. Surf. Sci.2012,258,3667-3673. 25.Schwidder, M.; Kumar, M. S.; Klementiev, K.; Pohl, M. M.; Bruckner, A., Grunert, W.J. Catal.2005,231,314-330. 26.Siljeg, M.; Stefanovic,S. C.; Mazaj, M.; Tusar, N. N.; Arcon, I.; Kovac, J.; Margeta, K.; Kaucic, V., Logar, N. Z.Micropor. Mesopor. Mat.2009,118, 408-415. 27.Dimirkou, A.Water Res.2007,41, 2763-2773. 28.