Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3

Synthesis of Na-, Fe-, and Co-promoted TiO22/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites and their use as a photocatalyst

Sayfa
440–454
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Moreover, as a novel material, the Na promotion in CNT TiO2 samples showed the best photocatalytic activity by enhancing the interaction between TiO2 and CNT surfaces.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The use of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in sol-gel synthesized titanium dioxide (TiO2) photocatalysts as templates was systematically studied.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:These catalysts helped to reduce the oxidation temperature of CNTs; thus anatase phase was achieved without significant sintering.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Moreover, as a novel material, the Na promotion in CNT TiO2 samples showed the best photocatalytic activity by enhancing the interaction between TiO2 and CNT surfaces.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2 samples
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The use of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in sol-gel synthesized titanium dioxide (TiO2) photocatalysts as templates was systematically studied. CNTs have high oxidative thermal stability and the controlled removal of CNTs can be achieved at lower temperatures under air flow by the use of Na, Fe, and Co as a catalyst. These catalysts helped to reduce the oxidation temperature of CNTs; thus anatase phase was achieved without significant sintering. The use of a promoter, heat treatment, and various heat treatment atmospheres was effective in specific surface area, crystallinity, and photocatalytic activity against methylene blue (MB) degradation. While the specific surface area of bare TiO2 was 22 m2 /g, after templating surface areas as high as 191 m2 /g were obtained. For the photocatalytic characterization, with bare TiO2 , the rate constant for MB decomposition was 0.81 h −1 , and for CNT TiO2 it was 1.31 h −1 . Moreover, after Na promotion, the rate constant increased to 1.85 h −1 . The results showed that CNTs can be used as a template to tailor and improve the textural properties. Moreover, as a novel material, the Na promotion in CNT TiO2 samples showed the best photocatalytic activity by enhancing the interaction between TiO2 and CNT surfaces.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YÜRÜM, A., KARAKAŞ, G. (2022). Synthesis of Na-, Fe-, and Co-promoted TiO22/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites and their use as a photocatalyst. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3, 440–454. https://ajindex.com/articles/601918

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (28)

  1. Erdural, B. K.; Yurum, A.; Bakir, U.; Karakas, G. J. Nanosci. Nanotechno. 2008, 8, 878-886
  2. Zheng, H.; Maness, P. C.; Blake, D. M.; Wolfrum, E. J.; Smolinski, S. L.; Jacoby, W. A. J. Photoch. Photobio. A 2000, 130, 163-170
  3. Mills, A.; Davies, R. H.; Worsley, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 22, 417-425
  4. Erkan, A.; Bakir, U.; Karakas, G. J. Photoch. Photobio. A 2006, 184, 313-321
  5. Tseng, T. K.; Lin, Y. S.; Chen, Y. J.; Chu, H. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 2336-2361
  6. Vaiano, V.; Iervolino, G.; Sannino, D.; Murcia, J. J.; Hidalgo, M. C.; Ciambelli, P.; Navio, J. A. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2016, 188, 134-146
  7. Bernardini, C.; Cappelletti, G.; Dozzi, M. V.; Selli, E. J. Photoch. Photobio. A 2010, 211, 185-192
  8. Diebold, U. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2003, 48, 53-229
  9. Paz, Y.; Luo, Z.; Rabenberg, L.; Heller, A. J. Mater. Res. 1995, 10, 2842-2848
  10. Hasegawa, G.; Kanamori, K.; Nakanishi, K.; Hanada, T. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 3110-3115
  11. Hu, L. L.; Yoko, T.; Kozuka, H.; Sakka, S. Thin Solid Films 1992, 219, 18-23
  12. Guan, K. H. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2005, 191, 155-160
  13. Orha, C.; Manea, F.; Pop, A.; Bandas, C.; Lazau, C. Desalin. Water. Treat. 2016, 57, 14178-14187
  14. Ahn, Y. U.; Kim, E. J.; Kim, H. T.; Hahn, S. H. Mater. Lett. 2003, 57, 4660-4666
  15. Sobczyk-Guzenda, A.; Gazicki-Lipman, M.; Szymanowski, H.; Kowalski, J.; Wojciechowski, P.; Halamus, T.; Tracz, A. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 5409-5414
  16. Renugadevi, R.; Venkatachalam, T.; Narayanasamy, R.; Kirupha S. D. Optik 2016, 127, 10127-10134
  17. Kajitvichyanukul, P.; Amornchat, P. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mat. 2005, 6, 344-347
  18. Arconada, N.; Castro, Y.; Duran, A.; Hequet, V. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2011, 107, 52-58
  19. Konishi, J.; Fujita, K.; Nakanishi, K.; Hirao, K. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 6069-6074
  20. Agrios, A. G.; Pichat, P. J. Photoch. Photobio. A 2006, 180, 130-135
  21. Hathway, T.; Jenks, W. S. J. Photoch. Photobio. A 2008, 200, 216-224
  22. Zamora, M.; Lopez, T.; Asomoza, M.; Melendrez, R.; Gomez, R. Catal. Today 2006, 116, 234-238
  23. Hsiang, H. I.; Lin, S. C. Mat. Sci. Eng. a-Struct. 2004, 380, 67-72
  24. You, X. F.; Chen, F.; Zhang, J. L. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Techn. 2005, 34, 181-187
  25. Wetchakun, N.; Incessungvorn, B.; Wetchakun, K.; Phanichphant, S. Mater. Lett. 2012, 82, 195-198
  26. Cooper, I. L.; Egerton, T. A.; Qiu, F. L. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 29, 637-646
  27. Islam, S. Z.; Rankin, S. E. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 182, 382-293
  28. Liu, Y. D.; Goebl, J.; Yin, Y. D. Ch