KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

Environmental impact assessment of natural radioactivity and heavy metals in drinking water around Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant in Mersin Province

Yusuf Ziya YILMAZ
Halim TAŞKIN
Gürsel KARAHAN
Nesli BİNGÖLDAĞ
Enis KAPDAN
Sayfa
735–747
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Cancer risks of heavy metals decreased inthe order of Cd > Cr > Ni for the region.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to determine natural radioactive and heavy element concentrations in Mersindrinking water samples before the commissioning of the Akkuyu nuclear power plant and to collect data for possibleenvironmental contaminations in the future.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Meangross alpha and beta radioactivity concentrations in drinking water were 0.059 Bq/L and 0.120 Bq/L, respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Cancer risks of heavy metals decreased inthe order of Cd > Cr > Ni for the region.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine natural radioactive and heavy element concentrations in Mersindrinking water samples before the commissioning of the Akkuyu nuclear power plant and to collect data for possibleenvironmental contaminations in the future. Drinking water samples were taken from the provincial center, districts,and populated villages. The annual effective dose of natural radionuclides and cancer risks were calculated for eachperson living in the city. Hazard index and cancer risk were calculated, which were caused by heavy elements. Meangross alpha and beta radioactivity concentrations in drinking water were 0.059 Bq/L and 0.120 Bq/L, respectively. Theannual cumulative effective dose for people was 30.83 µSv. Average estimated excess cancer risk related to this exposurewas 16.9 × 10 −5. Mean metal concentrations of Cr, Ni, Zn, Cu, Ba, and Cd in drinking water were 1.33, 4.65, 54.8,11.1, 26.3, and 0.36 µg/L, respectively. Pb and As were lower than the detection limits. Mean calculated hazard indexdepending on heavy metal concentration was 6.8 × 10 −1for drinking water. Cancer risks of heavy metals decreased inthe order of Cd > Cr > Ni for the region.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, Y. Z., TAŞKIN, H., KARAHAN, G., BİNGÖLDAĞ, N., KAPDAN, E. (2022). Environmental impact assessment of natural radioactivity and heavy metals in drinking water around Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant in Mersin Province. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 735–747. https://ajindex.com/articles/601775

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (30)

  1. De˘gerlier, M.; Karahan G. Desalination 2010, 261, 126-130
  2. Bencko, V. Env. Health Perspectives 1977, 19, 179-182
  3. Huang, X. Mutat. Res-Fund. Mol. M. 2003, 53, 153-171
  4. Fail A. P.; Chapin, E. R.; Price, J.C.; Heindel, J. J. Reprod. Toxicol. 1998, 12, 1-18
  5. Van der Kooij, L. A.; Van der Meent, D.; Van Leeuwen, C. J.; Bruggemen, W. A. Water Research 1991, 25, 697-705
  6. Chale, F. M. Sci. Total Env. 2002, 299, 115-121
  7. Kobya, Y.; Ta¸skın, H.; Ye¸silkanat, C. M.; C¸ evik, U.; Karahan, G.; C¸ akır, B. Water Air and Soil Pollution 2015, 226, 49
  8. ICRP 1991, Publication 60, 21, 1-3
  9. G¨or¨ur, F. K.; Camg¨oz, H. Chemosphere 2014, 112, 134-140
  10. US EPA 1989. Vol
  11. OSWER, EPA/540/1-89/002
  12. US EPA 2001. OSWER, 9355, 4e24
  13. US EPA 2011. DC, 20460, EPA/600/R-09/052F
  14. Zhang, L.; Mo, Z.; Qin, J.; Li, Q.; Wei, Y.; Ma, S.; Xiong, Y.; Liang, G.; Qing, L.; Chen, Z.; et al. South China Sci. Total Env. 2015, 530-531, 163-170
  15. Rasool, A.; Xiaoa, T.; Farooqic, A.; Shafeequed, M.; Masoode, S.; Alif, S.; Fahadg, S.; Nasimh, W. Ecological Engineering 2016, 95, 90-100
  16. Hu, B.; Jia, X.; Hu, J.; Xu, D.; Xia, F.; Li, Y. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1042
  17. Şahin, S¸.; Böke, N.; Yalçın, N; Mengeloğlu, M. K. MTA 2003, Do˘gu Akdeniz M¨ud¨url¨u˘g¨u
  18. Karahan, G.; Ozt¨urk, N.; Bay¨ulken, A. ¨ Water Res. 2000, 34, 18, 4367-4370
  19. PTB, Technical Committees of Deutscher Kalibrierdienst (DKD) 2011
  20. Gamma irradiator, AEA Technology QSA GmbH
  21. Taşkın, H.; Kam, E.; Bozkurt, A. Desalination and Water Treatment 2012, 45, 21-25
  22. Kapdan, E.; Taşkın, H.; Kam, E.; Osmanlıoğlu, A. E.; Karahan, G.; Bozkurt, A. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2012, 150, 398-404
  23. WHO 2004. Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. 3rd ed., 1, Recommendations
  24. Waseem, A.; Arshad, J.; Iqbal, F.; Sajjad, A.; Mehmood, Z.; Murtaza, G. BioMed Res. International 2014, 9, 29
  25. Turdi, M.; Yang, L. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 938
  26. Bajwa, B. S.; Kumar, S.; Singh, S.; Sahoo, S. K.; Tripathi, R. M. Indian J. Radiation Res. App. Sci. 2017, 10, 13-19
  27. Rahman, Z.; Singh, V.P. Saudi J. Biological Sci. 2016, 09
  28. Arain, M. B.; Ullah, I.; Niaz, A.; Shah, N.; Shah, A.; Hussain, Z.; Tariq, M.; Afridi, H. I.; Baig, J. A.; Kazi, T. G. Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology 2014, 3-4, 114-123
  29. Kruawal, K.; Sachern, F.; Werner, A.; M¨uller, J.; Knepper, T. P. Science of the Total Environment 2005, 340, 57-70
  30. WHO. Guidelines f