KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

Efects of diferent irrigation methods and plant density on silage yield and yield components of PR 31Y43 hybrid corn cultivar

Muhammet KARAŞAHİN
Sayfa
159–168
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, when water conservation is taken into consideration (I2, 7%; I3,11%), subsoil irrigation becomes more important.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Tis study was conducted to determine the efects of diferent irrigation methods (drip I1, subsoil drip I2, and subsoilcapillary I3) and diferent plant densities (102,040 plants ha 1, D1; 119,040 plants ha 1, D2; and 142,850 plants ha 1, D3) on the silageyield and yield components of PR 31Y43 hybrid corn cultivar (Zea mays L. indentata S.) in the years 2011 and 2012 under the ecologicalconditions of Eskipazar-Karabük.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In both research years, the plant densities were statistically signifcant for stem diameter, fresh earratio, fresh plant weight, silage, and dry matter yield.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, when water conservation is taken into consideration (I2, 7%; I3,11%), subsoil irrigation becomes more important.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Tis study was conducted to determine the efects of diferent irrigation methods (drip I1, subsoil drip I2, and subsoilcapillary I3) and diferent plant densities (102,040 plants ha 1, D1; 119,040 plants ha 1, D2; and 142,850 plants ha 1, D3) on the silageyield and yield components of PR 31Y43 hybrid corn cultivar (Zea mays L. indentata S.) in the years 2011 and 2012 under the ecologicalconditions of Eskipazar-Karabük. In both research years, the plant densities were statistically signifcant for stem diameter, fresh earratio, fresh plant weight, silage, and dry matter yield. Te highest stem diameter, fresh ear ratio, and fresh plant weight values wereobtained from D1 and D2 plant densities, and the highest silage and dry matter yields were obtained from D3 and D2 plant densities.Irrigation methods were statistically signifcant for fresh and dry plant weight in the second research year, and the highest values wereobtained from drip irrigation. Te I × D interactions were statistically signifcant for plant height in both research years, while theywere statistically signifcant for number of leaves, stem diameter, fresh leaf ratio, fresh ear ratio, fresh plant weight, and silage yield inthe second research year. Te highest silage yield was obtained from I3 × D3 interaction. D3 and D2 plant densities in all 3 irrigationmethods could be recommended for corn silage farmers. However, when water conservation is taken into consideration (I2, 7%; I3,11%), subsoil irrigation becomes more important.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARAŞAHİN, M. (2022). Efects of diferent irrigation methods and plant density on silage yield and yield components of PR 31Y43 hybrid corn cultivar. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 159–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/599470

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Adamsen FJ (1992). Irrigation method and water quality efects on corn yield in the mid-Atlantic coastal plain. Agron J 84: 837– 843. Aras İ (2006). Drip irrigation. J Field Crops CRI 15: 49–60 (in Turkish). Budaklı Çarpıcı E, Çelik N, Bayram G (2010). Yield and quality of forage maize as infuenced by plant density and nitrogen rate. Turk J Field Crops 15: 128–132. Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Busscher WJ (1989). Subsurface and alternate- middle micro irrigation for the southeastern coastal plain. ASAE Publ 32: 451–456. Charlesworth PB (2003). Investigation of the efciency and long term performance of various sub-surface irrigation confgurations under feld conditions. PhD, School of Agriculture, Charles Sturt University, New South Wales, Australia. Cox B, Cherney J, Atkins P (1997). Corn silage hybrids and plant populations. What’s cropping up? 20: 12–13. Cox WJ, Cherney DJR (2001). Row spacing, plant density and nitrogen efects on corn silage. Agron J 93: 597–602. Cusicanqui JA, Lauer JG (1999). Plant density and hybrids infuence on corn forage yield and quality. Agron J 91: 911–915. Evett SR, Howell AT, Schneider AD (2000). Energy and water balances for surface and subsurface drip irrigated corn. International Water and Irrigation 20: 18–22. Hammad HM, Ahmad A, Abbas F, Farhad W (2012). Optimizing water and nitrogen use for maize production under semiarid conditions. Turk J Agric For 36: 519–532. Harris G (2005). Sub-surface drip irrigation: advantages and limitations. Te State of Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries 17650: 1–6. Hashemi AM, Herbert SJ, Putnam DH (2005). Yield response of corn to crowding stress. Agron J 97: 839–846. Hassanli AM, Ebrahimizadeh MA, Beecham S (2009). Te efects of irrigation methods with efuent and irrigation scheduling on water use efciency and corn yields in an arid region. Agr Water Manage 96: 93–99. Howell AT, Scheneider DA, Evet RS (1997). Subsurface and surface microirrigation of corn—southern high plains. ASAE Publ 40: 635–641. Humphreys L, Fawcett B, O’Neill Chris, Muirhead W (2005). Maize under sprinkler, drip and furrow irrigation. IREC Farmers’ Newsletter 170: 35–38. İptaş S, Acar A (2006). Efects of hybrid and row spacing on maize forage yield and quality. Plant Soil Environ 52: 515–522. Jeschke M, Curran B (2008). Plant population efects on corn silage yield and quality. Pioneer Agronomy Science 18: 1–4. Kheira AAA (2009). Comparison among diferent irrigation systems for defcit-irrigated corn in the N