KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

Variations in response of determinate common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation

Emre Demirer DURAK
Semra DEMİR
Çeknas ERDİNÇ
Suat ŞENSOY
Aytekin EKİNCİALP
Sayfa
1–9
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

MC was significantlycorrelated only with P content.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study evaluated seedling traits (shoot/root length, fresh and dry weights of shoots/roots, number of leaves, shootdiameter), phosphorus (P) content, mycorrhizal colonization (MC), and relative mycorrhizal dependency (RMD) of 21 common beangenotypes inoculated by 4 different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) [Glomus intraradices (Gi), Glomus mosseae (Gm), Gigasporamargarita (Gim), and commercial AMF (cAMF)] in a growth chamber under controlled growing conditions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Of the 20 genotypes and Nadide cv. examined, 5 responded positively and 3 responded negatively toinoculation with all AMF types.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:MC was significantlycorrelated only with P content.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study evaluated seedling traits (shoot/root length, fresh and dry weights of shoots/roots, number of leaves, shootdiameter), phosphorus (P) content, mycorrhizal colonization (MC), and relative mycorrhizal dependency (RMD) of 21 common beangenotypes inoculated by 4 different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) [Glomus intraradices (Gi), Glomus mosseae (Gm), Gigasporamargarita (Gim), and commercial AMF (cAMF)] in a growth chamber under controlled growing conditions. With the exception ofshoot diameter, inoculated plants had better seedling traits than noninoculated plants. P content of shoot was also higher in inoculatedplants than in noninoculated plants. Of the 20 genotypes and Nadide cv. examined, 5 responded positively and 3 responded negatively toinoculation with all AMF types. Great variations in RMD and MC were observed, with the highest RMD and MC in the T120 (69.54%)and T71 (81.09%) genotypes and the lowest in the V77 (1.26%) and V78 (31.42%) genotypes. Positive correlations were found betweenRMD and seedling traits, with the exception of shoot length as well as root length, P content, and colonization. MC was significantlycorrelated only with P content.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DURAK, E. D., DEMİR, S., ERDİNÇ, Ç., ŞENSOY, S., EKİNCİALP, A. (2022). Variations in response of determinate common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 1–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/599333

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Abdel-Fattah GM, El-Haddad SE, Hafez EE, Rashad YM (2011). Induction of defense responses in common bean plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Microbiol Res 166: 268-281.
  2. Abdel-Fattah GM, Shukry WM, Shokr MBM, Ahmed MA (2016). Application of mycorrhizal technology for improving yield production of common bean plants. Int J Appl Sci Biotechnol 4: 191-197. Azcón-Aguilar C, Barea JM (1997). Applying mycorrhiza biotechnology to horticulture: significance and potentials. Sci Hortic 68: 1-24. Azcón R, Ocampo JA (1981). Factors affecting the vesiculararbuscular infection and mycorrhizal dependency of thirteen wheat cultivars. New Phytol 87: 677-685.
  3. Broughton WJ, Hernandez G, Blair M, Beebe S, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J (2003). Bean (Phaseolus spp.)-model food legumes. Plant Soil 252: 55-128.
  4. Chalk PM, Souza RF, Urquiaga S, Alves BJR, Boddey RM (2006). The role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in legume symbiotic performance. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 2944-2951.
  5. Declerck S, Plenchette C, Strullu DG (1995). Mycorrhizal dependency of banana (Musa acuminate, AAA group) cultivar. Plant Soil 176: 183-187.
  6. Demir S, Şensoy S, Ocak E, Tüfenkçi Ş, Demirer Durak E, Erdinç Ç, Ünsal H (2015). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF), humic acid and whey on wilt disease caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb. in three Solanaceous crops. Turk J Agric For 39: 300-309.
  7. Eke P, Chatue GC, Wakam LN, Kouipou RMT, Fokou PVT, Boyom, FF (2016). Mycorrhiza consortia suppress the fusarium root rot (Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli) in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Biological Control 103: 240-250.
  8. Ganry F, Diem HG, Wey J, Dommergues YR (1985). Inoculation with Glomus mosseae improves N2 fixation by field-grown soybeans. Biol Fertil Soils 1: 15-23.
  9. Giovanetti M, Mosse B (1980). An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol 84: 489-500.
  10. Goltapeh EM, Danes YR, Prasad R, Varma A (2008). Mycorrhizal fungi: what we know and what should we know? In: Varma A, editor. Mycorrhiza. 3rd ed. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, pp. 3-28.
  11. Hacısalihoglu G, Duke ER, Longo LM (2005). Differential response of common bean genotypes to mycorrhizal inoculation. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 118: 150-152.
  12. Habte M, Manjunath A (1987). Soil-solution phosphorus status and mycorrhizal dependency in Leucaena leucocephala. Appl Environ Microbiol 797-901.
  13. Ibijbijen J, Urquiaga S, Ismaili M, Alves BJR, Boddey RM (1996). Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth, miner