Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4

Selected engineering properties of tiger nut as a function of moisture content and variety

Sayfa
263–271
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Varieties showed differences in terms of 1000-tubermass, sphericity, terminal velocity and angle of repose, length, geometric mean diameter, surface area, porosity, force, and energyabsorbed at different probability levels.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Some physical and mechanical properties of two tiger nut varieties (Sarışeker and Balyumru) were determined at fourmoisture contents.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Physical properties including length, width, thickness, geometric mean diameter, mass, 1000-tuber mass, bulkdensity, tuber density, surface area, terminal velocity, angle of repose, porosity, and friction coefficient were affected by moisture contentat a 1% probability level, excluding sphericity.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Varieties showed differences in terms of 1000-tubermass, sphericity, terminal velocity and angle of repose, length, geometric mean diameter, surface area, porosity, force, and energyabsorbed at different probability levels.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Some physical and mechanical properties of two tiger nut varieties (Sarışeker and Balyumru) were determined at fourmoisture contents. Physical properties including length, width, thickness, geometric mean diameter, mass, 1000-tuber mass, bulkdensity, tuber density, surface area, terminal velocity, angle of repose, porosity, and friction coefficient were affected by moisture contentat a 1% probability level, excluding sphericity. All parameters decreased with a decrease in moisture content except tuber density,porosity, and firmness. Variety only had a statistically significant effect on width, geometric mean diameter surface area, and terminalvelocity at different probability levels. Force, deformation, firmness, energy absorbed, and power requirement, which were investigatedas mechanical properties, were also affected by moisture content at a 1% probability level. It was also found that the variety and loadingposition had no significant effect on firmness and energy absorbed, respectively. Varieties showed differences in terms of 1000-tubermass, sphericity, terminal velocity and angle of repose, length, geometric mean diameter, surface area, porosity, force, and energyabsorbed at different probability levels.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

VURSAVUŞ, K. K., İNCE, A., VURARAK, Y., ÇEVİK, M. Y., ÇUBUKCU, P. (2022). Selected engineering properties of tiger nut as a function of moisture content and variety. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4, 263–271. https://ajindex.com/articles/599316

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Abano EE, Amoah KK (2011). Effect of moisture content on the physical properties of tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus). Asian J Agric Res 5: 56-66.
  2. Adekanmi OK, Oluwatooyin OF, Yemisi AA (2009). Influence of processing techniques on the nutrients and anti-nutrients of tigernut (Cyperus esculentus L.). World Journal of Dairy & Food Sciences 4: 88-93.
  3. Akcali ID, Ince A, Guzel E (2006). Selected physical properties of peanuts. Int J Food Prop 9: 25-37.
  4. Arafat SM, Gaafar AM, Basuny AM, Nassef SL (2009). Chufa tubers (Cyperus esculentus L): as a new source of food. World App Sci 7: 151-156.
  5. Arslan S, Vursavus KK (2008). Physico-mechanical properties of almond nut and its kernel as a function of variety and moisture content. Philipp Agric Sci 91: 171-179.
  6. Bamishaiye EI, Bamishaiye OM (2011). Tiger nut: as a plant, its derivatives and benefits. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 11: 5157-5170.
  7. Belewu MA, Abodunrin OA (2008). Preparation of Kunnu from unexploited rich food source: tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus). Pakistan J Nutr 7: 109-111.
  8. Codina-Torella I, Guamis B, Trujillo AJ (2015). Characterization and comparison of tiger nuts from different geographical originphysico-chemical characteristics and protein fractionation. Ind Crop Prod 65: 406-414.
  9. Deshpande SD, Bal S, Ojha TP (1993). Physical properties of soybean. J Agric Eng Res 56: 89-98.
  10. Dutta SK, Nema VK, Bhardwaj RK (1988). Physical properties of gram. J Agric Eng Res 39: 259-268.
  11. Fraser BM, Verma SS, Muir WE (1978). Some physical properties of fababeans. J Agric Eng Res 23: 53-57.
  12. Gupta RK, Das SK (1997). Physical properties of sunflower seeds. J Agric Eng Res 66: 1-8.
  13. İnce A, Uğurluay S, Özlüoymak ÖB, Güzel E, Özcan MT (2008). Some physical properties of jojoba fruit related with design of processing equipments. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture; 14–17 October 2008;
  14. Antalya, Turkey. Kabas O, Vladut V (2016). Determination of some engineering properties of pecan (Carya illinoinensis) for new design of cracking system. Erwerbs-Obstbau 58: 31-39.
  15. Karababa E, Coşkuner Y, Nazlıcan AN (2001). Chemical composition and technological evaluation of chufa tuber (Cyperus esculentus L). Food 26: 243-246.
  16. Khazaei J, Rasekh M, Borghei AM (2002). Physical and mechanical properties of almond and its kernel related to cracking and peeling. In: Proceedings of the ASAE Annual International Meeting; 28–31 July 2002;
  17. Chicago, IL, USA. Mohsen