KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4

Genetic diversity of pinto and fresh bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm collected from Erzincan province of Turkey by inter-primer binding site (iPBS) retrotransposon markers

Kamil HALİLOĞLU
Atilla DURSUN
Arash HOSSEINPOUR
Halil İbrahim ÖZTÜRK
Sayfa
417–427
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Majority of the genotypes of the regions from where beans werecollected were placed in the same groups.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, genetic diversity among 71 bean genotypes (41 pinto beans and 30 fresh bean genotypes) and 4 commercialcultivars (Aleyna, Gina, Perolar, and Serra) commonly grown at Erzincan province in Turkey were investigated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Polymorphism ratio was identified as 100% in allprimers.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Majority of the genotypes of the regions from where beans werecollected were placed in the same groups.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2077 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this study, genetic diversity among 71 bean genotypes (41 pinto beans and 30 fresh bean genotypes) and 4 commercialcultivars (Aleyna, Gina, Perolar, and Serra) commonly grown at Erzincan province in Turkey were investigated. The iPBS (inter-primerbinding site) markers were used to investigate the genetic diversity of the genotypes. Polymorphism ratio was identified as 100% in allprimers. Twenty-seven primers were studied and number of alleles in primers varied between 13–69 (with an average value of 37.14).According to cluster analysis based on iPBS data, genotypes were divided into 2 groups. Polymorphic information content (PIC) valuesvaried between 0.19 (iPBS 2077) and 0.42 (iPBS 2381, iPBS 2385, and iPBS 2389) with an average PIC value of 0.33. According to geneticstructure analysis, genotypes were divided into 2 subpopulations. Majority of the genotypes of the regions from where beans werecollected were placed in the same groups.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HALİLOĞLU, K., DURSUN, A., HOSSEINPOUR, A., ÖZTÜRK, H. İ. (2022). Genetic diversity of pinto and fresh bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm collected from Erzincan province of Turkey by inter-primer binding site (iPBS) retrotransposon markers. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 417–427. https://ajindex.com/articles/599207

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Akbulut B, Karakurt Y, Tonguç M, (2013). Molecular characterization of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 26: 105-108.
  2. Andeden EE, Baloch FS, Derya M, Kilian B, Özkan H (2013). iPBSretrotransposons-based genetic diversity and relationship among wild annual Cicer species. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 22(4): doi: 453-466. 10.1007/s13562-012- 0175-5
  3. Anderson JA, Churchill GA, Autrique JE, Tanksley SD, Sorrells ME (1993). Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36(1): 181-186.
  4. Aydin MF, Baloch FS (2019). Exploring the genetic diversity and population structure of Turkish common bean germplasm by the iPBS-retrotransposons markers. Legume Research 42: 18- 24. doi: 10.18805/LR-423 Baloch FS, Alsaleh A, de Miera LES, Hatipoğlu R, Çiftçi V et al. (2015). DNA based iPBS-retrotransposon markers for investigating the population structure of pea (Pisum sativum) germplasm from Turkey. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 61: 244-252. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2015.06.017 Bilir Ö, Özmen CY, Özcan S, Kibar U (2019). Genetic analysis of turkey common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes by simple sequence repeats markers. Russian Journal of Genetics 55(1): 61-70. doi: 10.1134/S1022795419010034 Boronnikova SV, Kalendar RN (2010). Using IRAP markers for analysis of genetic variability in populations of resource and rare species of plants. Russian Journal of Genetics 46: 36-42. doi: 10.1134/S1022795410010060 Bukhari A, Bhat MA, Ahmad M, Saleem N (2015). Examination of genetic diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. African Journal of Biotechnology 14(6): 451-458. doi: 10.5897/ ajb2014.14281 Ceylan A, Öcal N, Akbulut M (2014). Genetic diversity among the Turkish common bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as assessed by SRAP, POGP and cpSSR markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 54: 219-229. doi: 10.1016/j. bse.2014.01.014 Dagnew K, Haileselassie T, Feyissa T (2014). Genetic diversity study of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm from Ethiopia using inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. African Journal of Biotechnology 13(36): 3638-3649. doi: 10.5897/ajb2013.13396 Dice LR (1945). Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26: 297-302. doi: 10.2307/1932409 Dursun A, Haliloglu K, Ekinci M (2010). Characterization of breeding lines of common bean as revealed by