Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

The effects of wheatgrass length on antioxidant activity and total phenolic content in wheatgrass (Triticum spp.)

Sayfa
271–277
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results of the analysis suggested that Sarıbaşak is the most promising cultivar interms of both antioxidant activity and TPC in wheatgrass.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was carried out with the aim of determining the effects of wheatgrass lengths on antioxidant activity and totalphenolic content of wheatgrass belonging to different cultivars (Triticum spp.) in laboratory conditions in 2017.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:When the wheatseedlings grown in plastic containers under soilless conditions reached three levels of wheatgrass length (5–6, 8–9, and 11–12 cm),the seedlings were cut from the root collar and dried in an oven.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results of the analysis suggested that Sarıbaşak is the most promising cultivar interms of both antioxidant activity and TPC in wheatgrass.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study was carried out with the aim of determining the effects of wheatgrass lengths on antioxidant activity and totalphenolic content of wheatgrass belonging to different cultivars (Triticum spp.) in laboratory conditions in 2017. When the wheatseedlings grown in plastic containers under soilless conditions reached three levels of wheatgrass length (5–6, 8–9, and 11–12 cm),the seedlings were cut from the root collar and dried in an oven. As a result of analysis of the dried material, it was found that the cutlengths of wheatgrass significantly (P < 0.01) affected antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of wheatgrass. Ten wheat cultivarsbelonging to Triticum monococcum L., T. durum L., and T. aestivum L. were used. Wheatgrass was cut at three lengths (5–6, 8–9, and11–12 cm). It was found that the wheatgrass lengths had a significant (P < 0.01) effect on antioxidant and total phenolic content ofwheatgrass. In addition, in terms of these traits, the most suitable wheatgrass length for cutting changed depending on the wheat speciesand also cultivars. The highest (P < 0.01) antioxidant activity and total phenolic content (TPC) were also determined at three wheatgrasslengths in cultivar Sarıbaşak. The average values obtained from Sarıbaşak wheatgrass were 31.0% for DPPH-free radical scavengingactivity and 51.6 mg GAE–1 dry weight for TPC. The results of the analysis suggested that Sarıbaşak is the most promising cultivar interms of both antioxidant activity and TPC in wheatgrass.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞAVŞATLI, Y. (2022). The effects of wheatgrass length on antioxidant activity and total phenolic content in wheatgrass (Triticum spp.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 271–277. https://ajindex.com/articles/599180

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Afroz RD, Nurunnabi ASM, Khan MI, Jahan T (2014). An experimental study on effects of wheatgrass (Triticum aestivum) juice on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level in blood of experimentally induced hypercholesterolaemic male long Evans rat. Bangladesh Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 30 (2): 18-24. doi: 10.3329/bjpp.v30i2.22678 Agrawal A, Gupta E, Chaturvedi R (2015). Determination of minerals and antioxidant activities at different levels of jointing stage in juice of wheat grass-the green wonder. Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences 3 (2): 311-316.
  2. Benzie IFF, Szeto YT (1999). Total antioxidant capacity of teas by the ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 47: 636-636. doi: 10.1021/ jf9807768 Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C (1995). Use of free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT - Food Science and Technology 28 (1): 25-30. doi: 10.1016/S0023- 6438(95)80008-5
  3. Chauhan M (2014). A pilot study on wheatgrass juice for its phytochemical, nutritional and therapeutic potential on chronic diseases. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2 (4): 27-34.
  4. Chomchan R, Siripongvutikorn S, Puttarak P, Rattanapon R (2016). Investigation of phytochemical constituents, phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities of ricegrass juice compared to wheatgrass juice. Functional Foods in Health and Disease 6 (12): 822-835. doi: 10.31989/ffhd.v6i12.290 Ergün T (2011). Determination of grass juice yield and quality of some cereals. MSc, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey. Hasani A, Kongoli R, Peculi A, Kokthi E (2016). Chemical analysis and nutritional values of wheatgrass compared to apple juice and sour cherry/apple juice. International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research 2 (4): 699-710.
  5. Karakaş FP (2016). Effects of drought and salinity stress on early seedling growth and antioxidant activity in hulled einkorn (Triticum monococcum ssp. monococcum) and bread (Triticum aestivum L.) wheats. Journal of Central Research Institute for Field Crops 25 (1): 107-116.
  6. Karaşahin M (2015). The effects of different carbon dioxide doses on yield and nutritional values of hydroponic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grass juice. International Journal of Agricultural and Wildlife Sciences 1 (2): 78-84 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Karaşahin M (2017). The effects of different seaweed doses on yield and nutritional values of hydroponic wheatgrass juice. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Scie