Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

Application of handheld laser scanning technology for forest inventory purposes in the NE Turkey

Sayfa
229–242
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, the Turkish FI system could benefit from this novel technology, which in turn supports the implementation ofsound forest management and planning.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Forest inventory (FI) is the most challenging stage of forest management and planning process.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To this end, forest sampling plots wereconventionally measured to collect dendrometric data from 437 trees in Artvin and Saçınka Forest Enterprises.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, the Turkish FI system could benefit from this novel technology, which in turn supports the implementation ofsound forest management and planning.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Forest inventory (FI) is the most challenging stage of forest management and planning process. Therefore, in situ surveys areoften reinforced by modern remote sensing (RS) methods for collecting forestry-related data more efficiently. This study tests a stateof-the-artdata collection method for practical use in the Turkish FI system for the first time. To this end, forest sampling plots wereconventionally measured to collect dendrometric data from 437 trees in Artvin and Saçınka Forest Enterprises. Then, each plot wasscanned using a handheld mobile laser scanning (HMLS) instrument. Finally, HMLS data were compared against ground measurementsvia basic FI measures. Based on statistical tests, no apparent differences were found between the two datasets at the plot level (P 0.97; P < 0.01). Residual analysis showed thatboth positive and negative errors had a homogeneous distribution, except for plot 8 where tree stems were in irregular shapes due toanthropogenic pressures. When all plots’ data were aggregated, average values for the number of trees, basal area, and timber volumewere estimated as 535 trees/ha–1, 49.6 m2/ha–1, and 499.7 m3/ha–1, respectively. Furthermore, secondary measures such as the numberof saplings and slope were successfully retrieved using HMLS method. The highest overestimation was in timber volume with less than10% difference at the landscape level. The differences were attributed to poor data quality of conventional measurements, as well asmarginal site conditions in some plots. We concluded that the HMLS method met the accuracy standards for most FI measures, exceptfor stand height. Thus, the Turkish FI system could benefit from this novel technology, which in turn supports the implementation ofsound forest management and planning.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ZEYBEK, M., VATANDAŞLAR, C. (2022). Application of handheld laser scanning technology for forest inventory purposes in the NE Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 229–242. https://ajindex.com/articles/599171

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Akay AE (2004). A new method of designing forest roads. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 28: 273-279.
  2. Akay AE, Oğuz H, Karas IR, Aruga K (2009). Using LiDAR technology in forestry activities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 151: 117-125.
  3. Akay AE, Wing MG, Sessions J (2012). Estimating structural properties of riparian forests with airborne lidar data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 33 (22): 7010-7023.
  4. Akgül M, Yurtseven H, Akburak S, Çoban S (2016). Determination of some tree parameters using terrestrial laser scanner in urban green areas. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 66 (2): 445-458 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Anton H, Rorres C (2010). Elementary linear algebra − Applications version. New Jersey, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Apostol B, Chivulescu Ş, Ciceu A, Petrila M, Pascu I-S et al. (2018). Data collection methods for forest inventory: a comparison between an integrated conventional equipment and terrestrial laser scanning. Annals of Forest Research 61 (2): 189-202.
  5. Arslan AE, Erten E, İnan M (2016). Application of geodetic projections to terrestrial laser scanning in leaf area index calculation. In: 24th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference; Zonguldak, Turkey. pp. 957-960 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Asan Ü (2017). Orman Amenajmanı (Planlama Sistemleri). İstanbul, Turkey: İstanbul University Publishing (in Turkish). Başkent EZ, Köse S, Keleş S (2005). The forest management planning system of Turkey: Constructive criticism towards the sustainable management of forest ecosystems. International Forestry Review 7 (3): 208-217.
  6. Bauwens S, Bartholomeus H, Calders K, Lejeune P (2016). Forest inventory with terrestrial LiDAR: A comparison of static and hand-held mobile laser scanning. Forests 7 (6): 127-144.
  7. Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992). A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 14 (2): 239-256.
  8. Bettinger P, Boston K, Siry JP, Grebner DL (2009). Forest Management and Planning. Burlington, MA, USA: Academic Press.
  9. Bulut S, Günlü A, Keleş S (2016). Estimation of some stand parameters using Göktürk-2 satellite image. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium of Forest Engineering and Technologies; Bursa, Turkey. pp. 118-124.
  10. Büyüksalih I, Bayburt S, Schardt M, Büyüksalih G (2017). Forest stem volume calculation using airborne lidar data. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry,