Dergiler / The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

Investigation of Injuries Due to Different Types of Button Batteries Stuck in Ear Canals

Sayfa
81–85
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Zinc-air BBs, which are generally used in hearing aids, appear to have less damage potential compared to others

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Button Batteries (BB) stuck in the Ear Canal (EC) have a special importance among foreign bodies in terms of causing complications depending on the length of time they remain in place, especially in children.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the present study, the purpose was to compare the damaging effects of frequently used BB chemicals on EC and the differences among them.Material and Methods: After 4 EC models prepared from freshly frozen cadaveric bovine ears were thawed, Lithium, Alkaline, Silver-oxide, and Zinc-air BBs with similar size were placed respectively in the canals as the negative poles in contact with the skin.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Zinc-air BBs, which are generally used in hearing aids, appear to have less damage potential compared to others
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Button battery · foreign bodies · ear canal

Abstract

Objective: Button Batteries (BB) stuck in the Ear Canal (EC) have a special importance among foreign bodies in terms of causing complications depending on the length of time they remain in place, especially in children. In the present study, the purpose was to compare the damaging effects of frequently used BB chemicals on EC and the differences among them.Material and Methods: After 4 EC models prepared from freshly frozen cadaveric bovine ears were thawed, Lithium, Alkaline, Silver-oxide, and Zinc-air BBs with similar size were placed respectively in the canals as the negative poles in contact with the skin. The voltage, tissue temperatures, and pHs of the BBs were measured and visual damage was photographed at the 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours. The BBs were removed at the end of the 24th hour, and EC models were examined histopathologically in a single-blind manner.Results: Although the visual damage could be observed in the first 1.5 hours in ECs with Lithium, Alkaline, and Silver-oxide BBs, it was observed that this time extended to 2.5 hours in Zinc-air. The highest pH value was measured in lithium BB at the end of 24 hours, and the lowest pH value was measured in Zinc-air BB. The least voltage loss was measured in alkaline BB, and not all BB types caused significant changes in tissue temperatures for 24 hours. No significant tissue necrosis depth was detected in Zinc-air BB, but it was most common in Lithium, Silver-oxide, and Alkaline BBs, respectively.Conclusion: All BB chemicals, especially Lithium BB, might cause alkaline necrosis at varying degrees by increasing the pH in EC models without any heat change. Zinc-air BBs, which are generally used in hearing aids, appear to have less damage potential compared to others

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAKIRTAŞ, M., AKGÜL, G. (2022). Investigation of Injuries Due to Different Types of Button Batteries Stuck in Ear Canals. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 81–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/597890

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Sancaktar ME, Bayraktar C, Bakırtaş M. Injury Mechanism of Button Batteries in the Nasal Cavity and Possible Mitigation Strategies During Impaction. Laryngoscope 2020
  2. 130(10):2487-93. google scholar 2. Buttazzoni E, Gregori D, Paoli B, Soriani N, Baldas S, Rodriguez H, et al. Susy Safe Working Group. Symptoms associated with button batteries injuries in children: An epidemiological review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015
  3. 79(12):2200-7 google scholar 3. Morris S, Osborne MS, McDermott AL. Will children ever learn? Removal of nasal and aural foreign bodies: a study of hospital episode statistics. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2018
  4. 100(8):1-3. google scholar 4. Thabet MH, Basha WM, Askar S. Button battery foreign bodies in children: hazards, management, and recommendations. Biomed Res Int 2013
  5. 846091. google scholar 5. Lin VY, Daniel SJ, Papsin BC. Button batteries in the ear, nose and upper aerodigestive tract. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004
  6. 68(4):473-9. google scholar 6. Litovitz TL. Battery ingestions: product accessibility and clinical course. Pediatrics 1985
  7. 75(3):469-76. google scholar 7. Jatana KR, Rhoades K, Milkovich S, Jacobs IN. Basic mechanism of button battery ingestion injuries and novel mitigation strategies after diagnosis and removal. Laryngoscope 2017
  8. 127(6):1276-82. google scholar 8. Huang T, Li WQ, Xia ZF, Li J, Rao KC, Xu EM. Characteristics and outcome of impacted button batteries among young children less than 7 years of age in China: a retrospective analysis of 116 cases. World J Pediatr 2018
  9. 14(6):570-5. google scholar 9. Premachandra DJ, McRae D. Severe tissue destruction in the ear caused by alkaline button batteries. Postgrad Med J 1990
  10. 66(771):52-3. google scholar 10. Penteado SP, Bento RF. Performance analysis of ten brands of batteries for hearing aids. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013
  11. 17(3):291-304. google scholar 11. Svider PF, Vong A, Sheyn A, Bojrab DI 2nd, Hong RS, Eloy JA, et al. What are we putting in our ears? A consumer product analysis of aural foreign bodies. Laryngoscope 2015
  12. 125(3):709-14. google scholar 12. Strachan DR, Kenny H, Hope GA. The hearing-aid battery: a hazard to elderly patients. Age Ageing 1994
  13. 23(5):425-6. google scholar 13. Holdstein Y, Mazzawi S, Watad W, Shupak A. Wrong impression: middle ear foreign body following hearing aid fitting. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013
  14. 149(4):647-8. google scholar 14. Wasson JH, Gall V, McDonald R, Liang MH. The prescription of assistive devices for the elderly