Dergiler / The European Research Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Carotid endarterectomy: a comparison on general and local anesthesia

Sayfa
39–43
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Local anesthesia can be a safe option for evaluating the better neurological status during operation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces disabling or fatal stroke risk in patients with significant carotid stenosis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We retrospectively collected the data on 64 patients who underwent CEA under GA (47 patients) and LA (17 patients) at our hospital from January 2010 to January 2014.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Local anesthesia can be a safe option for evaluating the better neurological status during operation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces disabling or fatal stroke risk in patients with significant carotid stenosis. The aim of this study was to compare the results of CEA performed under general anesthesia (GA) or local anesthesia (LA) in patients with symptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis. Method. We retrospectively collected the data on 64 patients who underwent CEA under GA (47 patients) and LA (17 patients) at our hospital from January 2010 to January 2014. All clinical, demographics, preoperative risk factors and postoperative data were compared for postoperative results. Surgical indications, techniques, and complications were also compared. Result. The groups were similar for age, gender and preoperative risk factors. There were no significant differences in death (GA: 4.2% vs. LA: 0%; p =1.0), stroke (GA: 4.2% vs. LA: 0%; p=1.0), death/ stroke rate (GA: 2.1% vs. LA: 0%; p=1.0), nerve injury (GA: 2.1% vs. LA: 5.8%; p=0.464), saphenous vein patch closure (GA: 83% vs. LA: 59%; p=0.051), shunt rate (GA: 8.5% vs. LA: 6 %; p=1.0), hospital stay (GA: 8.2±5.7 day vs. LA: 6.2±2.9 day, p=0.275), hematoma rate (GA: 0 %vs. LA: 5.8%; p =0.266) and transient ischemic attack rate (GA: 4.2% vs. LA: 0%; p=1.0) between the two techniques. Mortality occurred in two patients (both in the GA group) due to stroke and myocardial infarction. Conclusion. Carotid endarterectomy performed safely under general or local anesthesia is associated with low morbidity and mortality rates. Local anesthesia can be a safe option for evaluating the better neurological status during operation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YAVUZ, S., ERDOLU, B., OZSİN, K. K., GUCU, A., YUMUN, G., SURER, S., TOKTAS, F., GONCU, T. (2022). Carotid endarterectomy: a comparison on general and local anesthesia. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 39–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/597843

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Tangkanakul C, Counsell C, Warlow C. Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2002;2:CD000126
  2. Lewis SC, Warlow CP, Bodenham AR et al. GALA Trial Collaborative Group. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9656):2132-42
  3. Lutz HJ, Michael R, Gahl B, Savolainen H. Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy-Improving the gold standard? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36(2):145-9
  4. Hidiroglu M, Çetin L, Kunt A, Karakifli O, Küçüker A, Sener E. Early results of carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery diseases. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama. 2010;18(3):190-5
  5. Liapis CD, Bell PR, Mikhailidis D et al. ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis:indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37(4):10-19
  6. Gurer O, Yapici F, Yapici N, Ozler A, Isik O. Comparison between local and general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: early and late results. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;46(2):131-8
  7. Kalko Y, Kafali E, Aydin U, Kafa U, Kosker T, Basaran M et al. Surgery of the Carotid Artery: Local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia. Acta Chir Belgica. 2007;107(1):53-7
  8. McCarthy RJ, Walker R, McAteer P, Budd JS, Horrocks M. Patient and hospital benefits of local anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;22(1):13-8
  9. Surer S, Yay K, Camkiran A, Bekmezci M, Darcin OT. Carotid endarterectomy with Local anaesthesia in patients with advanced age and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: early term results. Turk J Geriatr. 2013;16(4):372-5
  10. Halm EA, Hannan EL, Rojas M, Tuhrim S, Riles TS, Rockman CB et al. Clinical and operative predictors of outcomes of carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(3):420-8
  11. Stoner MC, Abbott WM, Wong DR, Hua HT, Lamuraglia GM, Kwolek CJ et al. Defining the high-risk patient for carotid endarterectomy: an analysis of the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43(2):285- 95
  12. Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008;4:CD000126. pub3
  13. Markovic D, Vlajkovic G, Sindjelic R, Markovic D, Ladjevic N, Kalezic N. Cervical plexus block versus general anesthesia in carotid surgery: single center experience. Arch Med Sci. 2012;8(6):1035-40
  14. Sideso