KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / The European Research Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Personnel radiation dose assessment using a novel dosimeter in the department of radiology and dentistry in a medical facility in Delta State, South-South Nigeria: our experience in the last 4 years

Margaret Idongesit ANİZOR
Akintayo Daniel OMOJOLA
Chibuzo Bede MADU
Mary-Ann Etim EKPO
Michael Onoriode AKPOCHAFOR
Samuel Olaolu ADENEYE
Ukeme Pius ANİEKOP
Sayfa
70–78
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Dose reports of personnel in both department reduced as theyear progressed due to radiation safety awareness

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Large percentages of X-ray facilities in Nigeria do not use radiation monitoring device; a fewpercentage that use them do not evaluate or carryout out assessment programs to ascertain the detriment tooccupationally exposed workers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study was aimed at evaluating dose reports from 2013 to 2016 forpersonnel who operate radiation facilities and those that work within radiation field during certain X-rayprocedures/examinations in the department of radiology and dentistry respectively; to ascertain if there iscorrelation between personnel dose and workload in both department and to determine if dose records arewithin acceptable limit recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safety series.Methods.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Dose reports of personnel in both department reduced as theyear progressed due to radiation safety awareness
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives. Large percentages of X-ray facilities in Nigeria do not use radiation monitoring device; a fewpercentage that use them do not evaluate or carryout out assessment programs to ascertain the detriment tooccupationally exposed workers. This study was aimed at evaluating dose reports from 2013 to 2016 forpersonnel who operate radiation facilities and those that work within radiation field during certain X-rayprocedures/examinations in the department of radiology and dentistry respectively; to ascertain if there iscorrelation between personnel dose and workload in both department and to determine if dose records arewithin acceptable limit recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safety series.Methods. Direct Ion Storage (DIS) dosimeter was used for a total of 35 occupationally exposed personnel whowork in the department of radiology and dentistry. The DIS dosimeter was read every two months and resultswere authomatically saved on the instadoseTMplatform. Results. The mean (total) dose in radiology departmentfor the first, second, third and fourth year was 0.17 ± 0.08 (3.52) mSv, 0.08 ± 0.03 (0.77) mSv, 0.07 ± 0.04(0.72) mSv and 0.07 ± 0.05 (0.55) mSv and in Dentistry was 0.08 ± 0.02 (0.73) mSv, 0.05 ± 0.02 (0.42) mSv,0.05 ± 0.02 (0.24) mSv and 0.07 ± 0.04 (0.34) mSv; respectively. There was significant difference in meanpersonnel dose from 2013-2016 in Radiology (p=0.028) and in Dentistry Department (p=0.004). Correlationof workload and personnel dose in Radiology (p=0.240) and Dentistry Department (p=0.765) wasn’t significant.There was no correlation in mean dose between both department (p=0.256). Conclusion. Overall mean dosein both department for occupationally exposed personnel were below IAEA annual dose limit of 20 mSvaveraged over a period of 5 consecutive years. Dose reports of personnel in both department reduced as theyear progressed due to radiation safety awareness

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ANİZOR, M. I., OMOJOLA, A. D., MADU, C. B., EKPO, M. E., AKPOCHAFOR, M. O., ADENEYE, S. O., ANİEKOP, U. P. (2022). Personnel radiation dose assessment using a novel dosimeter in the department of radiology and dentistry in a medical facility in Delta State, South-South Nigeria: our experience in the last 4 years. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 70–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/597805

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Frankel RI. Centennial of Röntgen’s discovery of x-rays. West J Med 1996;164:497-501
  2. Wyman SM. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital: a brief history. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:1141-4
  3. Spiegel PK. The first clinical X-ray made in America--100 years. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:241-3
  4. Mazrani W, McHugh K, Marsden PJ. The radiation burden of radiological investigations. Arch Dis Child 2007;92:1127-31
  5. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, McHugh K, Metcalf W, Kim KP, Craft AW, et al. CT scans in young people in Northern England: trends and patterns 1993-2002. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:832-8
  6. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Applying radiation safety standards in diagnostic radiology and interventional procedures using x rays. Safety Reports Series No. 39: Vienna IAEA Publication; 2006
  7. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards. IEAE Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3 (Interim): Vienna IAEA Publication; 2011
  8. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical electrical equipment-part 2-43: particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for interventional procedures. IEC Report 60601. Geneva: IEC Publication; 2000
  9. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Responsibilities and capabilities of a nuclear energy programme implementing organization. IAEA Nuclear Energy Serıes No. NG-T-3.6: Vienna IAEA Publication; 2009
  10. Shrader-Frechette K. Trimming Exposure Data, Putting Radiation Workers at Risk: Improving Disclosure and Consent through a National Radiation Dose-Registry. Am J Public Health 2007;97:1782-6
  11. Cardis E, Gilbert ES, Carpenter L, Howe G, Kato I, Armstrong BK, et al. Effects of low doses and low dose rates of external ionizing radiation: cancer mortality among nuclear industry workers in three countries. Radiat Res 1995;142:117-32
  12. Wang JX, Inskip PD, Boice JD Jr, Li BX, Zhang JY, Fraumeni JF Jr. Cancer incidence among medical diagnostic X-ray workers in China, 1950 to 1985. Int J Cancer 1990;45:889-95
  13. Akpochafor MO, Omojola AD, Soyebi KO, Adeneye SO, Aweda MA, Ajayi HB. Assessment of peak kilovoltage accuracy in ten selected X-ray centers in Lagos metropolis, South-Western Nigeria: A quality control test to determine energy output accuracy of an X-ray generator. J Health Res Rev 2016;3:60-5
  14. Eze CU, Abonyi LC, Njoku J, Irurhe NK, Olowu O. Assessment of radiation