Dergiler / The European Research Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6

Prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in neurovascular stenting: a single-center experience

Sayfa
601–609
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The effect of this condition on clinical outcomes in these patients should be investigated by randomized controlled trials.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance of patients undergoing neurovascular stenting procedure in the interventional radiology unit.Methods: The Multiplate® Analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) test data of 250 patients who underwent carotid or intracranial artery stenting due to atherosclerotic stenosis or treatment of intracranial aneurysms between 2013-2017 in the Interventional Radiology Unit of our hospital were evaluated retrospectively to detect the aspirin and clopidogrel resistance.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Aspirin or clopidogrel resistance defined as the higher AUC value than 40U and 46U, respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The effect of this condition on clinical outcomes in these patients should be investigated by randomized controlled trials.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013-2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance of patients undergoing neurovascular stenting procedure in the interventional radiology unit.Methods: The Multiplate® Analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) test data of 250 patients who underwent carotid or intracranial artery stenting due to atherosclerotic stenosis or treatment of intracranial aneurysms between 2013-2017 in the Interventional Radiology Unit of our hospital were evaluated retrospectively to detect the aspirin and clopidogrel resistance. Aspirin or clopidogrel resistance defined as the higher AUC value than 40U and 46U, respectively. The patients who did not have a result of the Multiplate® test; had anemia, known coagulation disorder or thrombocytopenia were excluded.Results: Among the 172 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 59 (34.3%) were those who had an intracranial stent during aneurysm treatment, and 113 (65.7%) had carotid stenting due to atherosclerotic stenosis. The prevalence of aspirin resistance was 9.4% (16/170) whereas that of clopidogrel resistance was 23.8% (41/172). Among the patients with atherosclerotic stenosis, aspirin resistance accounting for 3.6%, and clopidogrel resistance was 23.0%. Furthermore, the resistance in the patients with stent-assisted coiling for aneurysm treatment was 20.7% for aspirin and 25.4% for clopidogrel.Conclusions: In our study, the prevalence of aspirin resistance was found 9.4% and clopidogrel resistance 23.8% in patients who had neurovascular stenting. The effect of this condition on clinical outcomes in these patients should be investigated by randomized controlled trials.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Atasoy, D., Dinç, H., Oğuz, Ş., Sönmez, M. (2022). Prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in neurovascular stenting: a single-center experience. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6, 601–609. https://ajindex.com/articles/597665

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Fiorella D, Thiabolt L, Albuquerque FC, Deshmukh VR, McDougall CG, Rasmussen PA. Antiplatelet therapy in neuroendovascular therapeutics. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2005;16:517-40
  2. Qureshi AI, Luft AR, Sharma M, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: Part II--Clinical aspects and recommendations. Neurosurgery 2000;46:1360-75; discussion 1375-6
  3. Bonello L, Tantry US, Marcucci R, Blindt R, Angiolillo DJ, Becker R, et al. Consensus and future directions on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:919-33
  4. Oran I, Cinar C, Bozkaya H, Korkmaz M. Tailoring platelet inhibition according to multiple electrode aggregometry decreases the rate of thrombotic complications after intracranial flow-diverting stent implantation. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:357-62
  5. Tantry US, Mahla E, Gurbel PA. Aspirin resistance. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2009;52:141-52
  6. Price MJ. Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function testing after percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2011;305:1097
  7. Collet J-P, Cuisset T, Rangé G, Cayla G, Elhadad S, Pouillot C, et al. Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2100-9
  8. Trenk D, Stone GW, Gawaz M, Kastrati A, Angiolillo DJ, Müller U, et al. A randomized trial of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel after elective percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:2159-64
  9. Guirgis M, Thompson P, Jansen S. Review of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg 2017;66:1576-86
  10. Fiolaki A, Katsanos AH, Kyritsis AP, Papadaki S, Kosmidou M, Moschonas IC, et al. High on treatment platelet reactivity to aspirin and clopidogrel in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2017;376:112-6
  11. Asai T, Miyachi S, Izumi T, Matsubara N, Haraguchi K, Yamanouchi T, et al. Relationship between low response to clopidogrel and periprocedural ischemic events with coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:752-5
  12. Drazin D, Choulakian A, Nuno M, Kornbluth P, Alexander MJ. Body weight: a risk factor for subtherapeutic antithrombotic therapy in neurovascular stenting. J Neurointerv Surg 2011;3:177-81
  13. Lee DH, Arat A, Morsi H, Shal