KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / The European Research Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

A cross-sectional study of female sexual dysfunction among Turkish pregnant and nonpregnant women: correlation with hormone profile

Bahar Sarıibrahim Astepe
Işıl Köleli
Sayfa
258–267
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The Spearman correlation test results weresignificant between the total testosterone level and the FSFI arousal domain (r = 0.167, p < 0.05), FSFIlubrication domain (r = 0.264, p < 0.01), and FSFI total score (r = 0.212, p < 0.01), as well as between theandrostenedione level and FSFI lubrication domain (r = 0.211, p < 0.01), FSFI orgasm domain (r = 0.156, p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: To determine the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) and its correlation with theandrogenic hormones among pregnant and nonpregnant Turkish women.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 251 women, including 137 healthy pregnant and 114 healthynonpregnant Turkish women.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Assessment of female sexual function index (FSFI), sociodemographiccharacteristics, serum androgen levels, including the total testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate(DHEAS), 1-4 delta androstenedione.Results: There was a 65.7 % incidence of FSD in all of the participants, with an incidence of 58.8% in thepregnant and 41.2% in the nonpregnant women.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The Spearman correlation test results weresignificant between the total testosterone level and the FSFI arousal domain (r = 0.167, p < 0.05), FSFIlubrication domain (r = 0.264, p < 0.01), and FSFI total score (r = 0.212, p < 0.01), as well as between theandrostenedione level and FSFI lubrication domain (r = 0.211, p < 0.01), FSFI orgasm domain (r = 0.156, p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) and its correlation with theandrogenic hormones among pregnant and nonpregnant Turkish women.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 251 women, including 137 healthy pregnant and 114 healthynonpregnant Turkish women. Assessment of female sexual function index (FSFI), sociodemographiccharacteristics, serum androgen levels, including the total testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate(DHEAS), 1-4 delta androstenedione.Results: There was a 65.7 % incidence of FSD in all of the participants, with an incidence of 58.8% in thepregnant and 41.2% in the nonpregnant women. There was no significant difference in the FSFI total scoresbetween the pregnant and nonpregnant women (p > 0.05). Moreover, the androgen levels were not differentbetween the women with sexual dysfunction and those without. The Spearman correlation test results weresignificant between the total testosterone level and the FSFI arousal domain (r = 0.167, p < 0.05), FSFIlubrication domain (r = 0.264, p < 0.01), and FSFI total score (r = 0.212, p < 0.01), as well as between theandrostenedione level and FSFI lubrication domain (r = 0.211, p < 0.01), FSFI orgasm domain (r = 0.156, p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Astepe, B. S., Köleli, I. (2022). A cross-sectional study of female sexual dysfunction among Turkish pregnant and nonpregnant women: correlation with hormone profile. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 258–267. https://ajindex.com/articles/597530

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Sexual dysfunctions. In: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American. Psychiatric Association. 5th ed., 2013
  2. Garcia S, Moreno S, Aponte H. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in female outpatients and personnel at a Colombian hospital: correlation with hormonal profile. J Sex Med 2008;5:1208-13
  3. Laumann EO, Nicolosi A, Glasser DB, Paik A, GingellC, Moreira, et al; Gssab Investigators' Group. Sexual problems among women and men aged 40-80 y: prevalence and correlates identified in the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Int J Impot Res 2005;17:39-57
  4. Cayan S, Akbay E, Bozlu M, Canpolat B, Acar D, Ulusoy E. The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction and potential risk factors that may impair sexual function in Turkish women. Urol Int 2004;72:52-7
  5. Aslan E, Beji NK, Gungor I, Kadioglu A, Dikencik BK. Prevalence and risk factors for low sexual function in women: a study of 1,009 women in an outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Istanbul. J Sex Med 2008;5:2044-52
  6. Oruç S, Esen A, Laçin S, Adigüzel H, Uyar Y, Koyuncu F. Sexual behaviour during pregnancy. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;39:48-50
  7. Lee JT. The meaning of sexual satisfaction in pregnant Taiwanese women. J Midwifery Womens Heal 2002;47:278-86. [8] von Sydow K. Sexuality during pregnancy and after childbirth: a meta content analysis of 59 studies. J Psychosom Res 1999;47:27-49
  8. Orji EO, Ogunlola IO, Fasubaa OB. Sexuality among pregnant women in South West Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;22:166-8
  9. Sayle AE, Savitz DA, Thorp JM Jr, Hertz-Picciotto I, Wilcox AJ. Sexual activity during late pregnancy and risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:283-9
  10. Read JS Klebanoff MA. Sexual intercourse during pregnancy and preterm delivery:effects of vaginal microorganisms. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:514-9
  11. Heinig L, Engfer A. Schwangerschaft und Partnerschaft. Rep Psychol 1988;13:56-9
  12. Elraiyah T, Sonbol MB, Wang Z, Khairalseed T, Asi N, Undavalli C, et al. The benefits and harms of systemic dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in postmenopausal women with normal adrenal function: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:3536-42
  13. Dennerstein L, Dudley EC, Hopper JL, Burger H. Sexuality, hormones and the menopausal transition. Maturitas 1997;26:83- 93
  14. Baulieu EE, Thomas G, Legrain S, Lahlou N, Roger M, Debuire B, et al. Dehydroepiandr