Dergiler / The European Research Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Efficiency of the endovenous cyanoacrylate for the treatment of varicose veins using the VenablockTM system: a 24-month follow-up study of 116 patients

Sayfa
241–247
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: The NBCA administration is a safe treatment method for the VVs, and provides a satisfactory occlusion ratio with improved outcomes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Dilation of superficial veins and valvular insufficiency cause the common condition, varicose veins (VVs) on the lower extremities.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study is to evaluate and present the 24 months outcomes results of endovenous NBCA treatment in 116 patients with VV.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: The NBCA administration is a safe treatment method for the VVs, and provides a satisfactory occlusion ratio with improved outcomes.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: Dilation of superficial veins and valvular insufficiency cause the common condition, varicose veins (VVs) on the lower extremities. The treatment modalities for VVS include endovascular thermal ablation techniques using laser, steam and radiofrequency, surgery, foam sclerotherapy, which has various adverse effects. N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) is a relatively novel polymerizating agent that is used for the treatment of VVs. The aim of this study is to evaluate and present the 24 months outcomes results of endovenous NBCA treatment in 116 patients with VV. Methods: This is a prospective study on 116 patients (71 females, 45 males), treated in a single-center between August 2017 and March 2019. NBCA administration (Venablock®, Invamed, Turkey) was carried out with local anesthesia under ultrasound guidance. All patients were scheduled for follow-up evaluation at 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months. Clinical assessment, VCSS, and ultrasound were performed on patients in the follow-up visits. Results: The mean follow-up period was 16.27 ± 5.62 months. The preoperative and postoperative VCSS values were 6.93 ± 2.60 and 2.40 ± 1.12, respectively (p < 0.0001). The patients with a greater GSV diameter experienced an unfavorable outcome following the NBCA procedure (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was 12.9%. The complete occlusion was achieved in 101 (87.0%) patients. Conclusions: The NBCA administration is a safe treatment method for the VVs, and provides a satisfactory occlusion ratio with improved outcomes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Düzgün, A. C., İlkeli, E., Katırcıoğlu, F. (2022). Efficiency of the endovenous cyanoacrylate for the treatment of varicose veins using the VenablockTM system: a 24-month follow-up study of 116 patients. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 241–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/597423

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Evans CJ, Fowkes FG, Ruckley CV, Lee AJ. Prevalence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in the general population: Edinburgh Vein Study. J Epi- demiol Community Health 1999;53:149-53
  2. Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, Eklof BG, Gillespie DL, Gloviczki Ml, et al.The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guide- lines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Ve- nous Forum. J Vasc Surg 2011;53(5 Suppl):2S-48S
  3. Lee AJ, Evans CJ, Allan PL, Ruckley CV, Fowkes FG. Lifestyle factors and the risk of varicose veins: Edinburgh Vein Study. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:171-9
  4. Müller-Bühl U, Leutgeb R, Engeser P, Achankeng EN, Szec- senyi J, Laux G. Varicose veins are a risk factor for deep venous thrombosis in general practice patients. Vasa 2012;41:360-5
  5. Porter JM, Moneta GL. Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. International Consensus Committee on Chronic Ve- nous Disease. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:635-45
  6. Sarma N. Guidelines and recommendation on surgery for ve- nous incompetence and leg ulcer. Indian Dermatol Online J 2014;5:390-5
  7. Nesbitt C, Bedenis R, Bhattacharya V, Stansby G. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy ver- sus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(7):CD005624
  8. Korkmaz Ö, Göksel S, Gül M, Başçil H, Yildir Y, Berkan Ö. Does the use of N-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate in the treatment of lower extremity superficial varicose veins cause acute systemic inflam- mation and allergic reactions? Cardiovasc J Afr 2018;29:213-7
  9. Eroglu E, Yasim A. A Randomised clinical trial comparing N- Butyl cyanoacrylate, radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation for the treatment of superficial venous incompe- tence: two Year follow up results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018;56:553-60
  10. Rutherford RB, Padberg FT Jr, Comerota AJ, Kistner RL, Meissner MH, Moneta GL. Venous severity scoring: an adjunct to venous outcome assessment. J Vasc Surg 2000;31:1307-12
  11. Yavuz T, Acar AN, Aydın H, Ekingen E. A retrospective study of a new n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue ablation catheter incorpo- rated with application guiding light for the treatment of venous insufficiency: twelve-month results. Vascular 2018;26:547-55
  12. Merchant RF, DePalma RG, Kabnick LS. Endovascular oblit- eration of saphenous reflux: a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:1190-96
  13. Bozoglan O, M