KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / The European Research Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

The effect of cesarean section on the incidence of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Hafize Gökben Ulutaş
Gamze Uçan Gündüz
Sayfa
291–296
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: Cesarean section delivery could increase the incidence of CNLDO.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of cesarean section (CS) on the incidence and recovery of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The files of patients diagnosed with CNLDO, epiphora, and dacryocystitis under the age of 24 months were identified retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: Cesarean section delivery could increase the incidence of CNLDO.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction · vaginal delivery · cesarean section

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of cesarean section (CS) on the incidence and recovery of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). Methods: The files of patients diagnosed with CNLDO, epiphora, and dacryocystitis under the age of 24 months were identified retrospectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they were born via normal vaginal delivery (VD) or CS. Demographic data, gestational age, birth weight, application of lacrimal massage, and surgical treatment modalities were recorded from medical records. Results: The study included 173 consecutive patients, 68 were females and 105 were males. Eighty-two (47.4%) patients were born via VD and 91 (52.6%) patients were born via CS. The frequency of CS delivery in children with CNLDO (47.4%) was significantly higher than the same hospital’s total frequency of CS delivery (40.2%) (χ2 = 11, df = 1, p = 0.001). At presentation, the mean age of the patients born via CS was lower than patients born via VD (9.4 ± 6.8 months vs 12.07 ± 8.8 months) (p = 0.027). In 40 patients who had a family history of CNLDO, 23 patients recovered through non-surgical treatment, while 17 patients had a surgical intervention, which was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.009). The gestational age and birth weight of patients born via CS were significantly lower than patients born via VD (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: Cesarean section delivery could increase the incidence of CNLDO.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ulutaş, H. G., Gündüz, G. U. (2022). The effect of cesarean section on the incidence of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 291–296. https://ajindex.com/articles/597396

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Kendig EL Jr, Guerry D 3rd. The incidence of congenital impotency of the nasolacrimal duct. J Pediatr 1950;36:212
  2. MacEwen CJ, Young JD. Epiphora during the first year of life. Eye (Lond) 1991;5:596-600
  3. Sevel D. Development and congenital abnormalities of the nasolacrimal apparatus. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1981;18:13-9
  4. Olitsky, S.E. Update on congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2014;4:1-7
  5. Moscato, EE, Kelly JP, Weiss A. Developmental anatomy of the nasolacrimal duct: Implications for congenital obstruction. Ophthalmology 2010;117:2430-4
  6. Weiss, AH, Bran, F, Kelly J. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Delineation of anatomic abnormalities with 3-dimensional reconstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:842-8
  7. Ghuman T, Gonzales C, Mazow ML. Treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Am Orthoptic J 1999;49:163-8
  8. Nelson LB, Calhoun JH, Menduke H. Medical management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 1985;92:1187-90
  9. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Resolution of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nonsurgical management. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:730-4
  10. Yazici B, Akarsu C, Salkaya M. Silicone intubation with the Ritleng method in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J AAPOS 2006;10:328-32
  11. Kulas T, Bursac D, Zegarac Z, Rados GP, Hrgovic Z. New views on cesarean section: its possible complications and long-term consequences for children’s health. Med Arch 2013;67:460-3
  12. Spaniol K, Stupp T, Melcher C, Beheiri N, Eter N, Prokosch V. Association between congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and delivery by cesarean section. Am J Perinatol 2015;32:271-6
  13. Tavakoli M, Osigian CJ, Saksiriwutto P, Reyes-Capo DP, Choi CJ, Vanner EA, et al. Association between congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and mode of delivery at birth. J AAPOS 2018;22:381-5
  14. Dolar Bilge A. Mode of delivery, birth weight and the incidence of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Int J Ophthalmol 2019;12: 1134-8
  15. Kuhli-Hattenbach C, Lüchtenberg M, Hofmann C, Kohnen T. Increased prevalence of congenital dacryostenosis following cesarean section. Ophthalmologe 2016;113:675-83
  16. Palo M, Gupta S, Naik MN, Ali MJ. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and its association with the mode of birth. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2018;55:266-8
  17. Alakuş MF, Dağ U, Balsak S, Erdem S, Oncul E, Akgol S, et al. Is there an associa