Dergiler / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Observation of Weed Species, Frequency and Density in Common Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Fields of Diyarbakir, Turkey: A Case Study

Sayfa
164–172
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It wasobserved that the great infestation was shown by broadleafweeds due to the lack of effective weed control in the barleyareas.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The weed species in the common barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)fields in the Diyarbakir were observed with this study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For thispurpose, 50 quadrats of 1m by 1m (1 m-2) were randomly placedand examined at each study site.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It wasobserved that the great infestation was shown by broadleafweeds due to the lack of effective weed control in the barleyareas.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015-2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The weed species in the common barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)fields in the Diyarbakir were observed with this study. For thispurpose, 50 quadrats of 1m by 1m (1 m-2) were randomly placedand examined at each study site. In every set of the quadrat,frequency and density were observed throughout the croppingseason of 2015-2016. During the course of field study 72 weedspecies belonging to 21 families, 13 grasses, 59 broadleaveswere recorded. The common families were Asteraceae andPoaceae in the common barley fields. The encounter frequencyof weeds was determined by observing 80% wild mustard(Sinapis arvensis L., 80%), animated oat (Avena sterilis L.,63%), common wild oat(Avena fatua L., 54%), corn buttercup (Ranunculus arvensis L.,54%), corn poppy (Papaver rhoeas L., 52%), creeping thistle(Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., 51%), volunteer lentils (Lensculinaris Medik., 51%). Wild mustard, which had the highestfrequency was also the densest weed species (5.18 plant m-2),and other species such as animated oat (4.33 plant m-2),creeping thistle (1.77 plant m-2), common wild oat (1.72 plantm-2), corn buttercup (1.47 plant m-2), cleavers (1.38 plant m-2),corn poppy (1.22 plant m-2), volunteer lentils (1.07 plant m-2)were important species at all the observed fields. It wasobserved that the great infestation was shown by broadleafweeds due to the lack of effective weed control in the barleyareas.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PALA, F. (2022). Observation of Weed Species, Frequency and Density in Common Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Fields of Diyarbakir, Turkey: A Case Study. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 164–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/594772

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Afentouli C G & Eleftherohorinos I G (1996). Littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor) and short spiked canarygrass (Phalaris brachystachys) interference in wheat and barley. Weed Science 44: 560-565
  2. AHDB (2018). AHDB Cereals & Oilseeds. Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, Barley growth guide, Retrieved on December 22, 2018 from https://cereals.ahdb.org.uk/media/186381/g67-barley-growth-guide.pdf Anderson R L & Beck D L (2017). Characterizing weed communities among various rotations in central South Dakota. Weed Technology 21: 76-79
  3. Awika J M (2011). Major cereal grains production and use around the world. ACS Symposium Series, 1089: 1-13 Bora T & Karaca I (1970). Measurement of Disease and Loss in Cultures. Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Supplementary Textbook. Publication No: 167, pp. 43, Izmir Coken I & Akman Z (2016). Determination of yield and quality characteristics of barley cultivars in Isparta ecological conditions. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 20(1): 91-97 Davis P H (1965-1989). Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh University Press., Vol. 1-11, Edinburgh Elwis G S & Young D L (2000). The economic and environmental revolution in Semi-arid cropping in North America. Annals of Arid Zone 39(3): 347-361
  4. FAOSTAT (2014). Statistical data of FAOSTAT. Retrieved on November 19, 2014 from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home
  5. Guncan A (2014). Weed Management (Yabancı Ot Mücadelesi). Selcuk University Agriculture Faculty Publication, Konya, pp. 4-39
  6. IGC (2018). International Grain Council. Retrieved on September 14, 2018 from https://www.igc.int/en/default.aspx
  7. Jaggard K W, Qi A & Ober E S (2010). Possible changes to arable crop yields by 2050. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 365: 2835-2851 Koehler P & Wieser H (2013). Chemistry of Cereal Grains. In: Gobbetti M., Gänzle M. (Eds) Handbook on Sourdough Biotechnology. Springer, Boston, MA pp. 11-45 Kordali S & Zengin H (2011). Studies on weeds and their density, frequency, and association ın barley fields ın Bayburt Provinces. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Atatürk University 42(2): 117-131 Kumar V & Jha P (2017). Influence of nitrogen rate, seeding rate, and weed removal timing on weed interference in barley and effect of nitrogen on weed response to herbicides. Weed Science 65(1): 189-201
  8. Lanning S P, Talbert L E, Martin J M, Blake T K & Bruckner P L (1997). The genotype of wheat and barley affects li