Dergiler / Retina-Vitreus / 2020 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Neutrophils/Lymphocytes Ratio Between Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane and Macular Hole

Sayfa
247–251
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Patients with iERM showed higher NLR compared to other groups. iERM might be accompanied by subclinical systemic infl ammation, whereas IMH might not be associated with systemic process.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: To evaluate the infl ammatory state in patients with idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane (iERM) and Idiopathic macular hole (IMH) by utilizing neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio (NLR).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Diagnosis was made by slit lamp fundus examination with a 90D lens and confi rmed by spectral domain optic coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Patients with iERM showed higher NLR compared to other groups. iERM might be accompanied by subclinical systemic infl ammation, whereas IMH might not be associated with systemic process.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the infl ammatory state in patients with idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane (iERM) and Idiopathic macular hole (IMH) by utilizing neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio (NLR). Method: We reviewed the medical records of the consecutive patients diagnosed with IMH or iERM retrospectively. Diagnosis was made by slit lamp fundus examination with a 90D lens and confi rmed by spectral domain optic coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The control group composed of consecutively selected patients who underwent cataract surgery. Complete blood count values were obtained from routine preoperative laboratory examination in study groups and control group. The NLR was calculated by dividing neutrophils count by lymphocytes count. Results: The present study enrolled 123 eyes of 123 consecutive patients, which consist of 42 eyes with iERM, 41 eyes with IMH, and 40 control eyes. Average NLR was markedly higher in the iERM group compared to other groups (both p=0.001). IMH and control group were similar with respect to mean NLR (p= 0.071). The AUROC value of the NLR to distinguish patients with iERM and control was found to be 0.847. The best cutoff value was 2.09, with a sensitivity of 77.8% and specifi city of 73.5%. Conclusion: Patients with iERM showed higher NLR compared to other groups. iERM might be accompanied by subclinical systemic infl ammation, whereas IMH might not be associated with systemic process.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UYSAL, F., ALIKMA, M. S., CUBUK, M. O., UCGUL, A. Y., ÜNSAL, E. (2022). Comparison of Neutrophils/Lymphocytes Ratio Between Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane and Macular Hole. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 247–251. https://ajindex.com/articles/589077

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Azuma K, Ueta T, Eguchi S, Aihara M. Effects Of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Combined With Removal Of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane: A Systematic Review Of Literature And Meta-Analysis. Retina. 2017 Oct;37(10):1813- 1819
  2. Dupas B, Tadayoni R, Gaudric A. [Epiretinal membranes]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2015 Nov;38(9):861-75
  3. Stevenson W, Prospero Ponce CM, Agarwal DR, Gelman R, Christoforidis JB. Epiretinal membrane: optical coherence tomography-based diagnosis and classifi cation. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar 29;10:527-34
  4. Mavrofrides EC, Rogers AH, Truong S, Puliafi to CA, Fujimoto JG. Vitreoretinal interface disorders. In optical coherence tomography of ocular diseases. Ed. Schuman JS, Puliafi to CA, Fujimoto J. 2nd ed. SLACK Inc., 2004:69-110
  5. Bu SC, Kuijer R, Li XR, Hooymans JM, Los LI. Idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Retina 2014;34(12):2317-2335
  6. Gass JDM. Stereoscopic atlas of macular disease. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1987:716-717
  7. Iannetti L, Accorinti M, Malagola R, Bozzoni-Pantaleoni F, Da Dalt S, Nicoletti F et al Role of the intravitreal growth factors in the pathogenesis of idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:5786–5789 8. Harada T, Harada C, Mitamura Y, Akazawa C, Ohtsuka K, Ohno S et al Neurotrophic factor receptors in epiretinal membranes after human diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1060–1065 9. Mandelcorn E, Khan Y, Javorska L, Cohen J, Howarth D, MandelcornM Idiopathic epiretinal membranes: cell type, growth factor expression, and fl uorescein angiographic and retinal photographic correlations. Can J Ophthalmol 2003;38:457–463 10. Bainbridge J, Herbert E, Gregor Z. Macular holes: Vitreoretinal relationships and surgical approaches. Eye (Lond) 2008;22:1301-9
  8. Steel DH, Lotery AJ. Idiopathic vitreomacular traction and macular hole: A comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eye (Lond) 2013;27 Suppl 1:S1-21
  9. Chen Q, Liu ZX. Idiopathic Macular Hole: A Comprehensive Review of Its Pathogenesis and of Advanced Studies on Metamorphopsia. J Ophthalmol. 2019 May 23;2019:7294952
  10. Zandi S, Tappeiner C, Pfi ster IB, Despont A, Rieben R, Garweg JG. Vitreal Cytokine Profi le Differences Between Eyes With Epiretinal Membranes or Macular Holes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Nov 1;57(14):6320-6326
  11. Zahorec R Ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte counts—rapid and simple parameter of systemic infl ammation and stress in critically ill. Bratisl Lek Listy 2001;