Dergiler / Perinatal journal (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Use of ureteral catheter in uterine-sparing surgery for placenta accreta

Sayfa
158–164
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, we believe that the insertion of a catheter increases the possibility of diagnosing intraoperative damage.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The study aimed to investigate the effect of ureteral catheter use during surgery on the outcomes of obstetric and urinary complications in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and placenta previa.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The patients who were followed up at Meram Medical Faculty Hospital of Necmettin Erbakan University between January 2016 and November 2021 and diagnosed with PAS and placenta previa were included.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, we believe that the insertion of a catheter increases the possibility of diagnosing intraoperative damage.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to investigate the effect of ureteral catheter use during surgery on the outcomes of obstetric and urinary complications in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and placenta previa. Methods: The patients who were followed up at Meram Medical Faculty Hospital of Necmettin Erbakan University between January 2016 and November 2021 and diagnosed with PAS and placenta previa were included. Patients who underwent emergency and planned surgery were grouped as those with or without an intraoperative ureteral catheter. The primary outcome was determined as the rate of urinary system damage among these groups. The number of blood transfusions, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values and hemoglobin changes, length of hospitalization, patients who underwent uterine-sparing surgery or hysterectomy, urinary tract injury, and wound infection were compared regarding the use of catheters. Results: A total of 122 patients were included in the study. While an intraoperative ureteral catheter was placed in 56 (45.01%) patients, it was not used in 66 (54.09%) patients. Bladder injuries were determined in 31 (55.4%) patients with a catheter and 13 (19.7%) patients without a catheter, and no other urinary system injuries were found. The incidence of bladder injury was statistically significantly higher in the group with a catheter (p=0.001). The number of transfused erythrocyte suspensions, the hemoglobin change according to the preoperative hemoglobin level, and the mean duration of hospitalization in patients with a catheter were statistically significantly greater than the group without a catheter (p=0.001). Conclusion: Ureteral catheterization did not reduce urinary damage in patients with PAS and placenta previa who underwent uterine-sparing surgery and hysterectomy. However, we believe that the insertion of a catheter increases the possibility of diagnosing intraoperative damage.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EREN, G., AKKUŞ, F., DOĞRU, Ş., ACAR, A., ATCI, A. A. (2022). Use of ureteral catheter in uterine-sparing surgery for placenta accreta. Perinatal journal (Online), Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 158–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/588288

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Mogos MF, Salemi JL, Ashley M, Whiteman VE, Salihu HM. Recent trends in placenta accreta in the United States and its impact on maternal-fetal morbidity and healthcare-associated costs, 1998–2011. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016
  2. 1077– 82. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 2. Goffman D, Nathan L, Chazotte C. Obstetric hemorrhage: a global review. Semin Perinatol 2016
  3. 96–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 3. Mhyre JM, Shilkrut A, Kuklina EV, Callaghan WM, Creanga AA, Kaminsky S, et al. Massive blood transfusion during hospitalization for delivery in New York State, 1998–2007. Obstet Gynecol 2013
  4. 1288–94. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 4. Ben-Nagi J, Walker A, Jurkovic D, Yazbek J, Aplin JD. Effect of cesarean delivery on the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009
  5. 30–4. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 5. Nageotte MP. Always be vigilant for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014
  6. 87–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 6. Varlas VN, Bors RG, Birsanu S, Maxim B, Clotea E, Mihailov M. Maternal and fetal outcome in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) associated with placenta previa: a retrospective analysis from a tertiary center. J Med Life 2021
  7. 367–75. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 7. Parveen F. Urinary tract injuries during cesarean section in patients with morbid placental adherence. Journal of Surgery Pakistan 2021
  8. 9–12. 8. Jauniaux E, Chantraine F, Silver RM, Langhoff-Roos J
  9. FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: epidemiology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018
  10. 265– 73. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 9. Cali G, Forlani F, Lees C, Timor-Tritsch I, Palacios- Jaraquemada J, Dall’Asta A, et al. Prenatal ultrasound staging system for placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019
  11. 752–60. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 10. Nieto-Calvache AJ, López-Girón MC, Messa-Bryon A, Ceballos-Posada ML, Duque-Galán M, Ríos-Posada JGD, et al. Urinary tract injuries during treatment of patients with morbidly adherent placenta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021
  12. 3140–6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 11. Alanwar A, Al-Sayed HM, Ibrahim AM, Elkotb AM, Abdelshafy A, Abdelhadi R, et al. Urinary tract injuries during cesarean section in patients with morbid placental adherence: retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019
  13. 1461–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 12. Couret M, Huang Y, Khoury-Collado F, Friedman A, Hou JY, St. Clair CM, et al. Patterns of care for women with placenta accreta spectrum. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021