Dergiler / Medicine Science / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Determination of the prevalence of dental anomalies by digital panoramic radiography analysis

Sayfa
1128–1132
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The high rate of dental anomalies shows the importance of detecting dental anomalies.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:To determine the prevalence of dental abnormalities and which dental anomalies are more common in Turkish society by evaluating panoramic radiographs.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study is based on a retrospective examination of randomly selected panoramic radiographs of 2500 patients who applied to Karabük Oral and Dental Health Hospital during 2016-2020 years.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The high rate of dental anomalies shows the importance of detecting dental anomalies.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016-2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

To determine the prevalence of dental abnormalities and which dental anomalies are more common in Turkish society by evaluating panoramic radiographs. This study is based on a retrospective examination of randomly selected panoramic radiographs of 2500 patients who applied to Karabük Oral and Dental Health Hospital during 2016-2020 years. Dental anomalies were evaluated by dividing them into 5 types and 16 subtypes. Also, data such as age and gender of the patients were found from the patient records and noted. The average age of the patients was 34.5 (range 6-45) years; 1167 (46.68 %) patients were male and 1333 (53.32 %) were female. Of the 2500 patients, 817 had at the lowest one type of dental anomaly; so the prevalence of dental anomaly in the research community was calculated at 32.68% (43% of these were men, 57% were women). Amongst them of 750 (91.79%) patients had one type of anomaly, 61 (7.46%) had two types of anomalies, and 6 (0.75%) had three types of anomalies. Dental anomalies are quite common disorders of teeth. Although even not to show any symptom, they can induce very kind of practical complication. The high rate of dental anomalies shows the importance of detecting dental anomalies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Cirakoglu, N. Y., Gokcek, M. (2022). Determination of the prevalence of dental anomalies by digital panoramic radiography analysis. Medicine Science, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 1128–1132. https://ajindex.com/articles/579623

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Saberi EA, Ebrahimipour S. Evaluation of developmental dental anomalies in digital panoramic radiographs in Southeast Iranian Population. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6:291-5
  2. Uslu O, Akcam MO, Evirgen S, et al. Prevalence of dental anomalies in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:328-35
  3. Shokri A, Poorolajal J, Khajeh S, et al. Prevalence of dental anomalies among 7- to 35-year-old people in Hamadan, Iran in 2012-2013 as observed using panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44:7-13
  4. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology-E-Book: Principles and interpretation: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014
  5. Salem G. Prevalence of selected dental anomalies in Saudi children from Gizan region. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1989;17:162-3
  6. Harris EF, Clark LL. Hypodontia: an epidemiologic study of American black and white people. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:761-7
  7. Afify AR, Zawawi KH. The prevalence of dental anomalies in the Western region of saudi arabia. ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:837270
  8. Asaumi J, Hisatomi M, Yanagi Y, et al. Evaluation of panoramic radiographs taken at the initial visit at a department of paediatric dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:340-3
  9. Laganà G, Venza N, Borzabadi-Farahani A, et al. Dental anomalies: Prevalence and associations between them in a large sample of nonorthodontic subjects, a cross-sectional study. BMC oral health. 2017;17:1-7
  10. Bekiroglu N, Mete S, Ozbay G, et al. Evaluation of panoramic radiographs taken from 1,056 Turkish children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015;18:8-12
  11. Roberts A, Barlow ST, Collard MM, et al. An unusual distribution of supplemental teeth in the primary dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15:464-7
  12. Whittington B, Durward C. Survey of anomalies in primary teeth and their correlation with the permanent dentition. N Z Dent J. 1996;92:4-8
  13. Chen YH, Cheng NC, Wang YB, et al. Prevalence of congenital dental anomalies in the primary dentition in Taiwan. Pediatr Dent. 2010;32:525-9
  14. Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:510-4
  15. Ezoddini AF, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Community Dent Health. 2007;24:140-4
  16. Herrera-Atoche JR, Diaz-Morales S, Colome-Ruiz G, et al. Prevalence of dental anomalies in a Mexican population. Dentistry 3000. 2014;2
  17. Thongudomporn U, Fre