KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

The effects of two cooperative learning strategies on the teaching and learning of the topics of chemical kinetics

Ataman KARAÇÖP
Ümit ŞİMŞEK
Yasemin KOÇ
Kemal DOYMUŞ
Sayfa
52–65
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the results of this research, it was concluded that the teaching of chemical kinetics via the jigsaw and group investigation techniques was more effective in increasing academic achievement compared to the traditional teaching method.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to determine the effect of group investigation and jigsaw techniques on students’ academic achievement in the chemical kinetics unit of a general chemistry course.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study included a total of 106 students studying chemistry in three different classes during the 2008-2009 academic year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the results of this research, it was concluded that the teaching of chemical kinetics via the jigsaw and group investigation techniques was more effective in increasing academic achievement compared to the traditional teaching method.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2008-2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of group investigation and jigsaw techniques on students’ academic achievement in the chemical kinetics unit of a general chemistry course. This study included a total of 106 students studying chemistry in three different classes during the 2008-2009 academic year. One of these classes served as the investigation group, using group investigation, while the second served as the jigsaw group, using the jigsaw technique, and the third served as the control group, using the traditional teaching method. The main instruments for obtaining data were the Chemical Kinetics Achievement Test (ckAT) and Graphics Skills Test (GST), which were applied to the treatments groups. The questions in the ckAT are related to the rate of a chemical reaction, measuring reaction rates, the effect factors on rates of reaction, the order of reactions, and reaction mechanisms. The GST is designed to evaluate the reading and understanding of graphics in chemistry. This is an instrument requiring the students to make drawings and give explanations. Based on the results of this research, it was concluded that the teaching of chemical kinetics via the jigsaw and group investigation techniques was more effective in increasing academic achievement compared to the traditional teaching method.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARAÇÖP, A., ŞİMŞEK, Ü., KOÇ, Y., DOYMUŞ, K. (2022). The effects of two cooperative learning strategies on the teaching and learning of the topics of chemical kinetics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 52–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/568528

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Abordo, I., & Gaikwad S. (2005). Group investigation: How does it work? International Forum, 8 (1&2), 79-98.
  2. Aronson, E., & Shelley, P. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom. 2nd Ed. New York: Longman. Aronson, E., Stephen, C., Sikes, J., Blaney, N., & Snapp, M. (1978). The Jigsaw Classroom. Sage Publications, 197 p, Beverly Hills, Calif. Chairam,S., Somsook, E., & Coll, R.K. (2009). Enhancing Thai students’ learning of chemical kinetics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(1), 95–115.
  3. Chiappetta, E. L., & Russell, J. M. (1982). The relationship among logical thinking, problem solving instruction, and knowledge and application of earth science subject matter. Science Education, 66(1), 85–93.
  4. Choi, M.M.F., & P.S. Wong. (2004). Using a datalogger to determine first first-order kinetics and calcium carbonate in eggshells. Journal of Chemical Education 81, 859–61.
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Davidson, N., & Worsham, T. (Eds). (1992). Enhancing thinking through cooperative learning. Teachers College Press,
  6. New York, NY. Dornyei, Z. (1997). Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: group dynamics and motivation. Modern Language Journal, 81, 482–493.
  7. Doymuş, K., Şimşek, U., & Karaçöp, A. (2009a) The effects of computer animations and cooperative learning methods in micro, macro and symbolic level learning of states of matter. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 36, 109-128.
  8. Doymuş, K., Şimşek, U., Karaçöp, A., & Ada, S. (2009b). Effects of two cooperative learning strategies on teaching and learning topics of thermochemistry. World Applied Science Journal, 7 (1), 34-42.
  9. Doymuş, K. (2007). The effect of a cooperative learning strategy in the teaching of phase and one-component phase diagrams. Journal of Chemical Education, 84 (11), 1857-1860.
  10. Doymuş, K. (2008a). Teaching Chemical Equilibrium with the Jigsaw Technique. Research in Science Education, 38 (2), 249-260.
  11. Doymuş, K. (2008b). Teaching Chemical Bonding Through Jigsaw Cooperative Learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26 (1), 47-57.
  12. Eilks, I. (2005). Experiences and reflections about teaching atomic structure in a jigsaw classroom in lower secondary school chemistry lessons. Journal of Chemical Education, 82 (2), 313-319.
  13. Ertepınar, H., & Geban, O. (1996). Effect of instruction supplied with the investigativeoriented labora