Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2008 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Fifth-grade elementary school students' conceptions and misconceptions about the fungus kingdom

Sayfa
32–46
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Children’s persistent misconceptions, incomplete explanations, and over-generalizations are also discussed in this paper.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was conducted with four fifth-grade children from a public elementary school.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The purpose was to investigate children’s conceptions and misconceptions about the fungus kingdom both before and after a teaching intervention, using the interview and observation techniques of qualitative research.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Children’s persistent misconceptions, incomplete explanations, and over-generalizations are also discussed in this paper.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study was conducted with four fifth-grade children from a public elementary school. The purpose was to investigate children’s conceptions and misconceptions about the fungus kingdom both before and after a teaching intervention, using the interview and observation techniques of qualitative research. At both sets of interviews, the students were asked questions about molds, yeast, and mushrooms and about their feeding styles, reproduction, and living conditions. Interviews were tape recorded. The students received six hours of instruction after the pre-interviews. Student misconceptions before and after instruction were identified by qualitative analysis of verbatim responses. Results indicated that before instruction students had many misconceptions like “mold and yeast are not living organisms”, “fungi are plants”, “fungi mean mushroom” etc. Although they changed most of their misconceptions after the instruction, they still had conceptions that were inconsistent with the scientific perspective. Children’s persistent misconceptions, incomplete explanations, and over-generalizations are also discussed in this paper.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BULUNUZ, N., BULUNUZ, M., JARRETT, O. S. (2022). Fifth-grade elementary school students' conceptions and misconceptions about the fungus kingdom. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 32–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/568545

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Alparslan, C., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, O. (2003). Using the conceptual change instruction to improve learning. Journal of Biological Education, 37(3), 133-137. Annenberg/CPB (2004), Children's ideas about living, dead, and nonliving, Retrieved May 5, 2008, from, http://www.learner.org/channel/courses/essential/life/session1/ideas.html.
  2. Barman, C.R., Stein, M., Barman, N.S., & McNair, S. (2003). Students’ ideas about plants: Results from a national study. Science and Children, 41(1), 46-51.
  3. Chen, S.H. & Ku, C.H. (1999). Aboriginal children’s conceptions and alternative conceptions of plants. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. (ROC(D), 9(1), 10-19.
  4. Classification, Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia, (2007). Retrieved from, http://encarta.msn.com.
  5. Driver, R., Guesne, E. & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes, PA: Open University Press.
  6. Lewis, R. (1994). A New Place for Fungi? BioScience, 44(6), 389-391.
  7. Mestre, J. (1991). Learning and instruction in pre-college physical science. Physics Today, September, 56-62. Ministry of National Education (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı-MEB, 2000). Primary Science Curriculum (grade 5) [İlköğretin Fen Bilgisi Dersi (5. sınıf) Öğretim programı ve Klavuzu]. Develet Kitapları Müdürlüğü, Ankara. Ministry of National Education (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı-MEB, 2005). Primary Science Curriculum (grade 5) [İlköğretin Fen Bilgisi Dersi (5. sınıf) Öğretim programı ve Klavuzu]. Develet Kitapları Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
  8. Nazario, G.M., Burrowes, P.A., & Rodriguez, J. (2002). Persisting misconceptions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(5), 292-296.
  9. Pekmez, E.Ş. & Taşkın Can, B. (2007). The Reflection of 2000 and 2004 Science Curricula on the Prospective Teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 109-118.
  10. Pine K., Messer, D., & St. John, K. (2001). Children’s misconceptions in primary science: a survey of teachers’ view. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19 (1),79-96.
  11. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson,P.W., & Hewson, A.G.W. (1982). Accommodation of scientific conceptions: towards a theory of conceptual change, Science Education, 66, 211-227.
  12. Tunnicliffe, S.D., & Reiss, M.J. (2000). Building a model of the environment: How do children see plants? Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 172-179.
  13. Türkmen, L., Çardak, O., & Dikmenli, M. (2003). Lise öğrencilerinin canlıların çeşitliliği ve sınıflandırılması konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi, Retrieved May 5, 2008, from, http://www.fedu.metu.edu.tr