Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2019 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Integration of STEM Disciplines into Toulmin's Argumentation Model on Students’ Academic Achievement, Reflective Thinking, and Psychomotor Skills

Sayfa
216–230
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results suggested that the integration of STEM disciplines into Toulmin's argumentation model can be used for increasing academic achievement of students, developing of the reflective thinking, and observing the development of psychomotor skills at the formation of arguments in the classrooms.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this research was to examine the effect of integration of STEM disciplines into Toulmin’s argumentation model on students' academic achievement, reflective thinking, and psychomotor skills.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The participants were 40 sixth grade middle school students divided into two groups, an experimental and a control group with 20 students in each group.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results suggested that the integration of STEM disciplines into Toulmin's argumentation model can be used for increasing academic achievement of students, developing of the reflective thinking, and observing the development of psychomotor skills at the formation of arguments in the classrooms.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this research was to examine the effect of integration of STEM disciplines into Toulmin’s argumentation model on students' academic achievement, reflective thinking, and psychomotor skills. To be able to get this aim, a quasi-experimental method was used. The participants were 40 sixth grade middle school students divided into two groups, an experimental and a control group with 20 students in each group. The students were at the same achievement level and in a similar socioeconomic status in a public middle school. The experimental group received the treatment in the while the control group received traditional learning of the same topic. The data were collected from academic achievement test, reflective thinking test, and psychomotor observation form. The collected data were analyzed by using Mann Whitney U-test, descriptive analyses (e.g., percentage and frequency), and correlation analyses (Pearson’s product moment). According to the data obtained from the measurement tools, it was detected that the integration of STEM disciplines into Toulmin's argumentation model can be used for enhancing the academic achievement of students. It was specified that reflective thinking tendency levels of the experimental group were found to be at a high level. It was also documented that psychomotor skills of experimental group were found to be at a high level. The results suggested that the integration of STEM disciplines into Toulmin's argumentation model can be used for increasing academic achievement of students, developing of the reflective thinking, and observing the development of psychomotor skills at the formation of arguments in the classrooms.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YAMAN, S., GÜLEN, S. (2022). The Effect of Integration of STEM Disciplines into Toulmin's Argumentation Model on Students’ Academic Achievement, Reflective Thinking, and Psychomotor Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 216–230. https://ajindex.com/articles/568494

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Altun, E. (2010). The teaching of the Light Unit to elementary school students through a scientific discussion (Argumentation) method. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  2. Altun, Y.,& Yıldırım, B. (2015). Theoretically to practice STEM and sample applications. İstanbul:
  3. SEM-PA press. Ata Aktürk, A., Demircan, H. Ö., Şenyurt, E., & Çetin, M. (2017). Turkish Early Childhood Education Curriculum from the Perspective of STEM Education: A Document Analysis. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 16-34
  4. Atlı, M. (2007). The level of readiness of science and technology lessons as cognitive, emotional and psychomotor by primary 5th grade students and the effect of access to education program prepared for this. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Institute of Social Sciences, Niğde University, Niğde. Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş, B., Özdemir, S., Akgündüz D., Çorlu, M. S., & Öner, T. (2015). STEM education Turkey report. Istanbul Aydin University Online Publication. Biçer, A., Navruz, B., Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Öner, T., &Boedeker, P. (2015). STEM Schools vs. Non-STEM schools: Comparing students’ mathematics growth rate on high-stakes test performance. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications,6(1), 138-150.
  5. Boran, G. H. (2014). The impact of argument-based science teaching on the nature of science and on epistemological beliefs. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Pamukkale University Educational Sciences Institute, Denizli. Bozkurt, E. (2014). The impact of engineering design based science education on science teachers' decision-making skills, scientific process skills and process perceptions. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2009). Data analysis handbook for social sciences: statistics, research design, SPSS applications and comments. Ankara:
  6. Pegema Publishing. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Experimental patterns, pretest-posttest control group patterns and data analysis. Ankara:
  7. Pegema Publishing. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, Ö., & Köklü, N. (2013). Statistics for social sciences. Ankara:
  8. PegemA Publishing. Can, R. (2014). Development of attitude scale for Turkish literature lesson. International Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, 5(17), 111-127.
  9. Carnevale, A.P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2011). STEM: Science technology engineering mathematics. Washington: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.