Dergiler / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for benign conditions in obese patients

Sayfa
72–77
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

RAH and LH were associated with lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To compare outcomes of robotic-assisted (RAH), total laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) for benign conditions in obese patients.Material and Methods: Retrospective cohort (Class II-2) analysis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All obese patients who underwent RAH, LH or TAH for benign conditions by a single surgeon at the University of Texas Medical Branch between January 2009 and December 2011 were identified and their charts reviewed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:RAH and LH were associated with lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (p
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: To compare outcomes of robotic-assisted (RAH), total laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) for benign conditions in obese patients.Material and Methods: Retrospective cohort (Class II-2) analysis. All obese patients who underwent RAH, LH or TAH for benign conditions by a single surgeon at the University of Texas Medical Branch between January 2009 and December 2011 were identified and their charts reviewed. The patients’ characteristics, operative data, and post-operative outcomes were collected and statistically analyzed.Results: A total of 208 patients who underwent RAH (n=51), LH (n=24) or TAH (n=133) were analyzed. There were no significant differences among the groups in demographic characteristics, indications for surgery or pathologic findings. RAH and LH were associated with lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAPISIZ, Ö. L., ALANBAY, İ., BORAHAY, M. A., KILIÇ, G. S. (2022). Outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for benign conditions in obese patients. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 72–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/567486

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. WHO. Obesity 2018 [Feb 16,2018]. Available from:
  2. Fryar CD CM, Ogden CL. Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity, and Extreme Obesity Among Adults: United States, Trends 1960–1962 Through 2009–2010. 2012 [Feb 16, 2018]. Available from:
  3. CDC. Weight of the nation [Feb 16, 2018]. Available from:
  4. Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature 2000; 404: 635-43
  5. Osler M, Daugbjerg S, Frederiksen BL, Ottesen B. Body mass and risk of complications after hysterectomy on benign indications. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 1512-8
  6. Isik-Akbay EF, Harmanli OH, Panganamamula UR, Akbay M, Gaughan J, Chatwani AJ. Hysterectomy in obese women: a comparison of abdominal and vaginal routes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 710-4
  7. Khavanin N, Lovecchio FC, Hanwright PJ, Brill E, Milad M, Bilimoria KY, et al. The influence of BMI on perioperative morbidity following abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 449. e1-6
  8. Siedhoff MT, Carey ET, Findley AD, Riggins LE, Garrett JM, Steege JF. Effect of extreme obesity on outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012; 19: 701-7
  9. Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 1989; 5: 213-6
  10. Reich H. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: indications, techniques and outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19: 337-44
  11. Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK, Wegienka G. Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. JSLS 2012; 16: 542-8
  12. Advincula AP, Wang K. Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16: 291-301
  13. Kilic GS, Moore G, Elbatanony A, Radecki C, Phelps JY, Borahay MA. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of total laparoscopic and robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign pathology during introduction of a robotic program. Obstet Gynecol Int 2011; 2011: 683703
  14. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Mendivil A, Rossi E, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 585-93
  15. Lee J, Jennings K, Borahay MA, Rodriguez AM, Kilic GS, Snyder RR, et al. Trends in the national distribution of laparoscopic hysterectomies from 2003 to 2010. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: