Dergiler / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

The immunohistochemical and histologic effectsof contrast medium on uterus, fallopian tubes andovaries, given during hysterosalpingography: rat study

Sayfa
243–254
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Cellular activity of antioxidant enzymes was assessed immunohistochemically.Results: Inflammation, and cellular changes were detected at certain rates in all groups (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Previous studies have shown that damage occurs to internal genital tract during hysterosalpingography (HSG).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Two groups received ionizing radiation (15-20 miliRad three times) only.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Cellular activity of antioxidant enzymes was assessed immunohistochemically.Results: Inflammation, and cellular changes were detected at certain rates in all groups (p
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies have shown that damage occurs to internal genital tract during hysterosalpingography (HSG). The aim was to show that endometrial and tubal epithelium underwent free radical damage during HSG in an animal model.Material and Methods: Forty rats were evaluated in five different groups. Two groups received ionizing radiation (15-20 miliRad three times) only. Two further groups received ionizing radiation in combination with iohexol (1-2 mL). The remaining group served as control. Groups were evaluated after seven and forty-two days. Inflammation and cellular changes were evaluated histopathologically. Cellular activity of antioxidant enzymes was assessed immunohistochemically.Results: Inflammation, and cellular changes were detected at certain rates in all groups (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ADAM, G., PEK, E., GÖRET, C. C., HACIVELİOĞLU, S., ÜNSAL, M. A. (2022). The immunohistochemical and histologic effectsof contrast medium on uterus, fallopian tubes andovaries, given during hysterosalpingography: rat study. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 243–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/567422

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Thoma ME, McLain AC, Louis JF, King RB, Trumble AC, Sundaram R, et al. Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 1324-31.e1
  2. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1520-4
  3. Borght MV, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem 2018; 62: 2-10
  4. Ludwin I, Ludwin A, Wiechec M, Nocun A, Banas T, Basta P, et al. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye. Hum Reprod 2017; 32: 758-69
  5. Fayez JA, Mutie G, Schneider PJ. The diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in infertility investigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 558-60
  6. Roma DA, Ubeda B, Ubeda A, Monzón M, Rotger R, Ramos R, et al. Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in the detection of intrauterine abnormalities: a comparison with hysteroscopy. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 1405-9
  7. Copobianco G, Piredda N, Maiore M, Cherchi PL, Dessole M, Virdis G, et al. Hysterosalpingography in infertility investigation protocol: is it still useful? Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2015: 42: 448-51
  8. Sapmaz E, Akpolat N. Examination of the effect of pre-Hsg melatonin on endometrial ablation and uterine dysplastic cell development associated with radiation. Fırat Med J 2012; 17: 1-5
  9. Pala S, Atilgan R, Kuloglu T, Kara M, Baspinar M, Can B, et al. Protective effects of vitamin C and vitamin E against hysterosalpingography induced epithelian degeneration and proliferation in rat endometrium. Drug Des Devel Ther 2016; 10: 4079-89
  10. Karaman A, Diyarbakir B, Durur-Subasi I, Kose D, Özbek-Bilgin A, Topcu A, et al. A novel approach to contrast-induced nephrotoxicity: the melatonergic agent agomelatine. Br J Radiol 2016; 89: 20150716
  11. Kilciksiz S, Demirel C. Oxidative stress, radiation-induced damage and the potential role of N-acetylcysteine as a radioprotector. Turkish J Oncol 2008; 23: 200-7
  12. Bibault JE, Fumagalli I, Ferte C, Chargari C, Soria JC, Deutsch E. Personalized radiation therapy and biomarkerdriven treatment strategies: a systematic review. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2013; 32: 479-92
  13. Liu N, Lei R, Ta