Dergiler / Journal of Chemical Metrology / 2021 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Measurement uncertainty evaluation for titrimetric determination of benzoic acid purity

Sayfa
38–51
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The expanded uncertainties for one and six measurements based on the bottom-up approach were found as 0.508% and 0.509%, and the expanded uncertainty for six measurements based on the top-down approach was found as 0.114%.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Abstract: The uncertainty budget for the determination of benzoic acid purity by potentiometric titrimetry was proposed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For this purpose alcoholic potassium hydroxide solution was standardized with benzoic acid supplied from National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (SRM 39j), then the purity of the benzoic acid sample was determined by the same way.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The expanded uncertainties for one and six measurements based on the bottom-up approach were found as 0.508% and 0.509%, and the expanded uncertainty for six measurements based on the top-down approach was found as 0.114%.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Abstract: The uncertainty budget for the determination of benzoic acid purity by potentiometric titrimetry was proposed. For this purpose alcoholic potassium hydroxide solution was standardized with benzoic acid supplied from National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (SRM 39j), then the purity of the benzoic acid sample was determined by the same way. Measurement uncertainty evaluation of the method was exhaustively evaluated according to the EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4, JCGM 100: 2008 and EUROLAB Technical Report No.1/2007, based on the bottom-up approach. Moreover, these results were compared with the results based on the top-down approach according to the EUROLAB Technical Report No.1/2007 and NORDTEST: NT TR 537. The measurement uncertainty was separately evaluated for the factor determination and the purity determination of one and six samples of benzoic acid for the bottom-up approach. The uncertainty sources for the purity determination of benzoic acid were carbon dioxide mole fraction, nominal concentration of benzoic acid, factor of alcoholic potassium hydroxide, amount of titrant consumption, the molar mass of benzoic acid and sample amount, respectively. Among these, the highest contributions to the uncertainty budget were found to be the factor of alcoholic KOH solution and the amount of titrant consumption for one and six samples, respectively. The expanded uncertainties for one and six measurements based on the bottom-up approach were found as 0.508% and 0.509%, and the expanded uncertainty for six measurements based on the top-down approach was found as 0.114%.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LİV, L. (2022). Measurement uncertainty evaluation for titrimetric determination of benzoic acid purity. Journal of Chemical Metrology, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 38–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/560697

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. M.G.M.H. Elsayed, A.M. Gomaa and A.E.F.A. Elhassan (2017). Determination of sorbic acid and benzoic acid using reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) in different food commodities, Inventi. Rapid: Pharm. Anal. Qual. Assur. 2017, 22717
  2. F.W. Schwab and E. Wichers (1940). Preparation of benzoic acid of high purity, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 25, 747-757
  3. G.J. Davis and R.S. Porter (1969). Application of the differential scanning calorimeter to purity measurements, J. Therm. Anal. 1, 449-458
  4. T. Ohtsuki, K. Sato, N. Sugimoto, H. Akiyama and Y. Kawamura (2012). Absolute quantification for benzoic acid in processed foods using quantitative proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Talanta 99, 342-348
  5. JSA (1992). Benzoic acid, https://infostore.saiglobal.com/en-us/Standards/JIS-K-8073-1992- 623155_SAIG_JSA_JSA_1443558/ Accessed 10 March 2020
  6. JSA (2017). Benzoic acid, https://infostore.saiglobal.com/en-us/Standards/JIS-K-8073-2017- 623155_SAIG_JSA_JSA_1431433/ Accessed 10 March 2020
  7. J. O’Neil, P.E. Heckelman, C.B. Koch and K.J. Roman (2007). The merck index: An encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biologicals, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 2197
  8. JCGM (2008). Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf Accessed 3 June 2020
  9. EURACHEM and CITAC (2012). Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, https://www.eurachem.org/index.php/publications/guides/quam#translations Accessed 27 August 2020
  10. EUROLAB (2007). Measurement uncertainty revisited: Alternative approaches to uncertainty evaluation (Eurolab Technical Report No.1/2007), https://drive.google.com/file/d/1b_bKTxrJ-a9fYfxxfMqlj- CrTNnvOXNZ/view Accessed 22 December 2020
  11. B. Magnusson, T. Näykk, H. Hovind and M. Krysell (2012). Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories (NT TR 537 - Edition 3.1), http://www.nordtest.info/index.php/technical-reports/item/handbook-for-calculation-of-measurementuncertainty- in-environmental-laboratories-nt-tr-537edition-3.html Accessed 31 May 2020
  12. I. Leito, L. Jalukse and I. Helm (2014). Estimation of measurement uncertainty in chemical analysis, https://sisu.ut.ee/measurement/uncertainty Accessed 2 June 2020
  13. I. Leito, L. Jalukse and I. Helm (2015). Using MOOCs for teaching analytical chemistry: Experience at University of Tartu, Anal. Bioanal.