Consequently, it was determined that 100% concentration of alcohol based skin and hand disinfectant was effective against Staphilococcus aureus in 1 minute, while other test microorganisms were effective in 30 seconds.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, in order to define how effective alcohol based hand and skin disinfectant is to which concentration against Staphilococcus aureus (ATCC 29213), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 23853), Candida albicans (ATCC 10231) strains used for Test microorganisms, final microorganisms was disinfectant into the different concentrations of the disinfectant to be tested by being prepared as 2-5x109 CFU/ml according to the McFarland 5 turbidity of test disinfectant.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:After disinfectants were activated with microorganisms at previously experimented 30 seconds; 1,5,15 and 30 minute periods, colony counts at 1 ml.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Consequently, it was determined that 100% concentration of alcohol based skin and hand disinfectant was effective against Staphilococcus aureus in 1 minute, while other test microorganisms were effective in 30 seconds.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
In this study, in order to define how effective alcohol based hand and skin disinfectant is to which concentration against Staphilococcus aureus (ATCC 29213), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 23853), Candida albicans (ATCC 10231) strains used for Test microorganisms, final microorganisms was disinfectant into the different concentrations of the disinfectant to be tested by being prepared as 2-5x109 CFU/ml according to the McFarland 5 turbidity of test disinfectant. After disinfectants were activated with microorganisms at previously experimented 30 seconds; 1,5,15 and 30 minute periods, colony counts at 1 ml. Levels were performed by way of cast-cultural plaque metod. Consequently, it was determined that 100% concentration of alcohol based skin and hand disinfectant was effective against Staphilococcus aureus in 1 minute, while other test microorganisms were effective in 30 seconds.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
DUMAN, R., ÖZKALP, B., TURAÇLAR, N., ALADAĞ, M. O. (2022). In vitro effectiveness of alcohol based hand and skin disinfectants against various microorganisms. Journal of Applied Biological Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 67–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/560223
Ulusoy F. 1994. Asepsi 2. Baskı, Aydoğdu Ofset, Ankara
Elbaş N. 1998. Hastane Enfeksiyonlarının Kontrolünde Dezenfektanların Ve Antiseptiklerin Yeri, Hemşirelik Forumu, 1(1): 1-2
Pittet D. 2000. Improving Compliance With Hand Hygiene In Hospitals. Infect Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 21:381-386
Kanra G. 1999. El Yıkama Tekniği, Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi. 42:113-119 [5] Teare L. 2001. Hand hygiene. BMJ. 323: 411-412
Potter P., Parry A. 1997. Fundamentals of Nursing. Von Hoffman Pres. USA. 742-752
John M. 2000. MD Using Alcohol For Hand Antisepsis - Dispelling Old Myths. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. Vol. 21 (7)
Casewell M., Phillips I. 1987. Br. Med. J. 2:1315
Ojajarvi J. 1996. Hyg. J. Camb., 76-75
Özkalp B.2006. Alkol bazlı el dezenfektanın bazı mikroorganizmalara karşı invitro etkinliği. I. Ulusal Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulları Sempozyumu. Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı s:70 [11] Arıkan S. 1997. Temizlik, Dezenfeksiyon, Sterilizasyon, Hastane İnfeksiyonları Dergisi. 61-68 [12] Gürgün V. Halkman A.K.1988. Mikrobiyolojide Sayım Yöntemleri. Gıda Teknolojisi Derneği Yayın No:7, S: 5-44
Russel AD., Hugo WB., Ayliffe GAJ. 1982. Principles and practice of disinfection preservation and sterilization. Blockwell Scietifitic Publication, London. p:134-157
Kampf G, Hofer M, Ruden H.1988. Inactivation of chlorhexidine for in-vitro testing of disinfectants. Zentralbl Hyg Umwelmel. 200: 457-64
Reybrouck G. 1980. A comprarison of the quantitative suspansion tests fort he assesment of disinfectants. Zbl Bakt Hyg. 170: 449-456
Nakipoğlu Y., Gürler B.2004. Çeşitli dezenfektan ve antiseptik maddelerin Antibakteriyel etkinliğinin araştırılması. Aknem Derg. 18(4): 220-223
Pitted D. 2001. Improving adherence to hand hygiene practice: A multidisiplinary approach Emerg Infect Dis. 7(2): 234-240 [18] Winnefeld M et al.2000. Skin tolerance and effectiveness of two hand decontamination proceduras in everyday hospital use. British J. Dermatol. 143:546-550 [19] Teare L et al. 2001. Hand hygiene, BMJ. 323: 411-412 [20] Paulson SD et al. 1999. A close look at alcohol gel as an antimicrobial sanitizing agent. Am J Infect Control. 27: 332-338 [21] Steridol AB. Laitinen K. 1998. The study on the disinfection efficiacy of three alcoholoic hand disinfectantand preparations by Clinical Report. U of Helsinki, 2