Dergiler / Journal of Applied Biological Sciences / 2008 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Induced spawning, fertilization rate and hatching rate of bril, Scophthalmus rhombus

Sayfa
17–21
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There were significant differences in the fertilization and hatching rates between the hormone induced and the control group (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:An experiment was performed to obtain ovulation in female brill, Scophthalmus rhombus, to fertilise the oocytes, to describe the hatching rate and to assess their potential for aquaculture development.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Broodfish were captured between 6 to10 meters depths by the gill nets then transported to a commercial hatchery in Çanakkale, in the northwest cost of Turkey, where the experimental trials took place.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There were significant differences in the fertilization and hatching rates between the hormone induced and the control group (p
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:31 specimen
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

An experiment was performed to obtain ovulation in female brill, Scophthalmus rhombus, to fertilise the oocytes, to describe the hatching rate and to assess their potential for aquaculture development. Broodfish were captured between 6 to10 meters depths by the gill nets then transported to a commercial hatchery in Çanakkale, in the northwest cost of Turkey, where the experimental trials took place. The females (31 specimen) weighed between 498 and 1620 g and the males (25 specimen) between 218 and 644 g. The Broodfish were divided into two groups and treated with: a) a saline injection (control group), b) single injections of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (LHRH-a; single injection: 25 μg kg-1, induced group). Females successfully ovulated with a hormone dose of 25 μg kg-1. The eggs and the sperm were obtained by hand-stripping and then fertilized artificially. Mean egg fertilization varied between 1.0 % and 21.2 % in control groups and 12.5 % and 37.5 % in induced groups, where hatching ranged from 0 % to 6.82 % in control group and 8.7 % to 46.2 % in the induced group. Hatching occurred approximately 110-115 h after fertilization at 14 ± 1°C. There were significant differences in the fertilization and hatching rates between the hormone induced and the control group (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OZDEN, O., BOYACIOGLU, H., FILIZKAN, B., OZKIZILCIK, S., BASARAN, F. (2022). Induced spawning, fertilization rate and hatching rate of bril, Scophthalmus rhombus. Journal of Applied Biological Sciences, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 17–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/652303

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Anonymous. 2004. Fisheries Statistics. Turkish. State Institute of Statistics. Prime Ministry Republic of Turkey. [2] Basaran F, Samsun N. 2004. Survival rates of black sea turbot (Psetta maxima maeotica, L. 1758) broodstock captured by gill nets from different depths and their adaptation culture conditions. Aquaculture International. 12: 321-331. [3] Hachero I, Herrera GM, Mancera JM, Navas J, Mart G. 2006. Plasma sex steroid levels in relation to reproductive cycle of captive wild brill Scopthalmus rhombus. Word Aquaculture Society. Finfish Poster, Part-3, AQUA 2006,
  2. Florence, Italy. [4] Zengin M. 2000. The bioecology and population parameters of the turbot (Scophthalmus maeoticus, Pallas,1811) in the Turkish Coast of the Eastern Black Sea. KTÜ. The Enstitute of Sciences. Phd. Thesis. Turkish. Fishery and Processing Technology Department. Trabzon. [5] Mengi T. 1971. Flatfish and their population in Turkish Seas. Turkish. Istanbul University The Bulletin of Science Faculty. B (1-2): 53-70. [6] Whitehead PJP, Bauchot ML, Hureau JC, Nielsen J, Tortonese E. 1986. Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and The Mediterranean. UNESCO. (3) pp.1287-1293. [7] Coward K, Bromage NR, Hibbitt O, Parrington J. 2002. Gamete physiology, fertilization and egg activation in teleost fish. Fish and Fisheries. 12: 33-58. [8] Dumas S, Rosales-Velazquez MO, Contreras-Olguın M, Hernandez-Ceballos D, Silverberg N, 2004. Gonadal maturation in captivity and hormone-induced spawning of the Pacific red snapper Lutjanus peru. Aquaculture. 234: 615-623. [9] Shields RJ, Brown NP, Bromage NR. 1997. Blastomere morphology as a predictive measure of fish egg viability. Aquaculture. 155: 1-12. [10] Morehead DT, Pankhurst NW, Ritar AJ, 1998. Effect of treatment with LHRH analogue on oocyte maturation, plasma sex steroid levels and egg production in female striped trumpeter Latris lineata (Latrididae). Aquaculture. 169: 315–331. [11] Basaran F, Saka S, Firat K, Ozden O, Guntal A. 1999. The preliminary study on transfer and adaptation of turbot (Scophthalmus maeoticus, P.1811) and flounder species (Platichthys flesus luscus, L.1758). Turkish. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 16 (3-4): 301-307. [12] Kentouri M, Papandroulakis N, Pavlides M, Divanach P. 1995.
  3. Culture of the red porgy, Pagrus pagrus, in Crete. Present knowledge, problems and perspectives. In: Marine aquaculture finfish species diversification = Diversification des espèces de poissons en aquaculture marine. pp. 65-78. CIHEA