KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

Relationship Between Social Media Performance and Brand Image in Digital Branding Proces: Netflix Turkey

Şeyda OK
Mehmet BAŞ
Sayfa
3858–3872
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, due to the limited number of studies examining social media performance and brand image together in the digital branding process in the literature and the results of the analysis, it is thought that the study will contribute to both the literature and the sectoral field.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose – This study aimed to interpret the differences arising from the effect of demographic variability by analyzing the relationship between perceived social media performance and brand image.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Design/methodology/approach – To obtain the study data, a survey application was conducted with 385 users who followed Netflix Turkey social media accounts and had different demographics.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, due to the limited number of studies examining social media performance and brand image together in the digital branding process in the literature and the results of the analysis, it is thought that the study will contribute to both the literature and the sectoral field.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose – This study aimed to interpret the differences arising from the effect of demographic variability by analyzing the relationship between perceived social media performance and brand image. Design/methodology/approach – To obtain the study data, a survey application was conducted with 385 users who followed Netflix Turkey social media accounts and had different demographics. Findings – According to the results of the analysis, social media performance positively affects the brand image. In addition, it was determined that social media performance and brand image were perceived differently according to demographic variables. Discussion – Social media performance and the resulting brand image are very important for businesses. In this context, the analysis revealed that there is a positive relationship between perceived social media performance and brand image. While social media performance and brand image perception differ according to age group and income status, it has been concluded that social media performance and brand image do not differ according to gender and education level. In addition, due to the limited number of studies examining social media performance and brand image together in the digital branding process in the literature and the results of the analysis, it is thought that the study will contribute to both the literature and the sectoral field.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OK, Ş., BAŞ, M. (2022). Relationship Between Social Media Performance and Brand Image in Digital Branding Proces: Netflix Turkey. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 3858–3872. https://ajindex.com/articles/556414

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Aaker, D. (2015).
  2. Marka Değeri Yönetimi, Trans: Ender Orfanlı ( Publication date of the original work 1991).
  3. Mediacat Yayıncılık. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 347–356.
  4. Aaker, J. L., Fournier, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004). When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 1–16.
  5. Aktepe, C. & Baş, M. (2008), Marka Bilgisi Sürecinde marka Farkındalığı ve Algılanan Kalite İlişkisi ve GSM Sektörüne Yönelik Bir Analiz, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 10(1), 81-96.
  6. Aktepe, C. & Ertürk, R. (2020), Sosyal Medyanın Tüketicilerin Satınalma Davranışları Üzerinde Etkisi: Türkiye ve İran’daki Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Uygulama, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(4), 4289-4304.
  7. Akyıldız, S., & Yılmaz, K. G. Sosyal Medya Konulu Araştırmaların Bilim Haritalama Tekniği ile Bibliyometrik Analizi. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(28), 1416-1451.
  8. Alselm, K. J., & Kostelijk, E. (2008). Identity based marketing: A new balanced marketing paradigm. European Journal of Marketing, 907-914.
  9. Esch, F. R. (2008). Brand identity: The guiding star for successful brands. In B. Schmitt & D. L. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook on brand and experience management. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Faircloth, J. B. (2005). Factors influencing nonprofit resource provider support decisions: applying the brand equity concept to nonprofits. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 1-15.
  10. Fısk, P. (2009).
  11. İş Dehası, Trans: Tuğçe Esener( Publication date of the original work 2008). İstanbul:
  12. Mediacat Yayınları.
  13. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory on consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 343-373.
  14. Fournier, S., & Avery, J. (2011). Putting the ‘relationship’ back into CRM. Sloan Management Review, 52(3), 63- 72. Fournier, S., Dobscha, S., & Mick, D. G. (1998). Preventing the premature death of relationship marketing. Harvard Business Review, 76(Jan/Feb), 42–51.
  15. Graham, J. (2008). If there’s no brand, there’s no business. Canadian Manager, 26(1), pp. 25-27.
  16. Hankinson, G. & Cowking, P. (2005). Branding in action. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill. Hatch, J. M., & Schutz, M. (2011).
  17. Marka Girişimi, Trans: Uğur Mehter. Brandage. Hollebeek, L. D. (2011). Demystifying customer brand engagement: Exploring the loyalty nexus. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(7/8), 785–807.
  18. Hsieh, A. T. (2008). The moderating effect of brand image on public relations perception and customer loyalty. Marketing