Dergiler / İş Ahlakı Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Developments in Corporate Social Responsibility Understanding and Practices in Turkey

Sayfa
112–124
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Then, through the social responsibility studies conducted in Turkey, we examined the changes in the fields of corporate social responsibility activities in Turkey in recent years, the target group of the activities, how the enterprises evaluate CSR.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Businesses are open systems that operate in line with customer demands and needs, resulting in profit.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Nowadays, as a result of the increase of competition in the national and international arena, it is not enough for businesses to offer quality products or services.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Then, through the social responsibility studies conducted in Turkey, we examined the changes in the fields of corporate social responsibility activities in Turkey in recent years, the target group of the activities, how the enterprises evaluate CSR.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Businesses are open systems that operate in line with customer demands and needs, resulting in profit. Nowadays, as a result of the increase of competition in the national and international arena, it is not enough for businesses to offer quality products or services. Likewise it is not sufficient to offer this product or service to the market in accordance with the purchasing power of the consumer. Corporate social responsibility aims to comply with social norms and values in order to increase the quality of life of employees, families and society (Kotler & Lee, 2006; Bowen, 2009; Mohr, Webb & Haris, 2001, p. 47). At the same time, it can be expressed as the efforts of companies to reduce or eliminate their harmful effects on society and to maximize their long-term beneficial effects (Mohr and Webb, 2005). With corporate social responsibility practices, businesses make their lives more sustainable by getting approval from their stakeholders (Vo, 2011, p. 90). While CSR is seen as an important tool in establishing a relationship with the society and giving back to the society what has been taken from the society, it is also an important factor in the formation of corporate reputation (Bear, Rahman, & Post, 2010, p. 208). In a study done by Pfau et al. (2008), it was concluded that CSR ac-tivities have an effect on corporate reputation as a result of the perception created on individuals. In the literature, there is no study examining the change in the field of CSR in Turkey in recent years. The contribution of this study is that it presents the change in the understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility in Turkey in a holistic framework in the light of published reports. The change experienced by year and subject, the change in the perspective of companies, society and NGOs on CSR has been discussed within the scope of the research. In this study, firstly, corporate social responsibility is discussed conceptually. Then, through the social responsibility studies conducted in Turkey, we examined the changes in the fields of corporate social responsibility activities in Turkey in recent years, the target group of the activities, how the enterprises evaluate CSR.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAYIN, Z. (2022). Developments in Corporate Social Responsibility Understanding and Practices in Turkey. İş Ahlakı Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 112–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/555881

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Balaban Salı, J. (2016).
  2. Verilerin toplanması. A. Doğanay, M. Ataizi, A. Şimşek, J. Balaban Salı, ve Y. Akbulut, (Ed.), Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri içinde (161-135). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını. Bayraktaroğlu, G., İlter, B., ve Tanyeri, M. (2009). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk: Pazarlamada yeni bir paradigmaya doğru. İstanbul:
  3. Literatür Yayınları.
  4. Bear, S., Rahman, N. ve Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207-221.
  5. Bikmen, F. 2004. Türkiye’de fon geliştirme yönelimleri -STK’lar ve donörler üzerinde ampirik bir araştırma. Ankara: Sivil Toplum Geliştirme Merkezi. Bowen, G.A. (2009), "Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method", Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
  6. Bobbitt, P. 2002. The shield of achilles: War, peace and the course of History. New York: Random House Inc. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper. Brown, J., ve Dacin, A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.
  7. Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967. Capital Dergisi. (2005, 01 02). Sosyal sorumlulukta türkiye’nin liderleri. 20.12. 2020, https://www. capital.com.tr/capital-dergi/capitalde-bu-ay/sosyal-sorumlulukta-turkiyenin-liderleri. Capital Dergisi. (2011, 03 01). Yeni sosyal sorumluluk gerçekleri. 20.12. 2020, https://www.capital. com.tr/yonetim/pazarlama/yeni-sosyal-sorumluluk-gercekleri-003560. Capital Dergisi. (2015, 03 30). Yeni nesil kss dönemi. 20.12.2020, https://www.capital.com.tr/ is-dunyasi/arastirmalar/yeni-nesil-kss-donemi. Capital Dergisi. (2018, 03). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk 2018 raporu. 20.12. 2020, https://cdn2. hubspot.net/hubfs/2405078/cms-pdfs/fileadmin/user_upload/dyna_content/tr/gfk_capital_ kurumsal_sosyal_sorumluluk_arastirmasi_2018.pdf. Capital Dergisi. (2020, 04 13). KSS liginde son tablo. 20.12. 2020, https://www.capital.com.tr/ is-dunyasi/arastirmalar/kss-liginde-son-tablo. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
  8. Charmaz, K. ve Henwood. (2008). Grounded theory in psychology. C. Willig ve W. Stainton- Rogers (eds.)