Dergiler / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Atomıc Theories That Preservice Science Teachers Confuse and Underlying Reasons

Sayfa
212–220
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was also found that theunderlying reasons of this confusion were that “In both theory, the protons andneutrons are found together at the center of the atom (the nucleus) surrounded byelectrons spinning around it” and “students cannot differentiate between the conceptsof layer, orbit and shell”, and some recommendations were offered concerning theinstruction of these subjects.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Students come across with the notion of atom almost every year during theireducation life.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Participants of the study werecomprised of 55 first and second year university students attending the Department ofScience Teaching during the 2015-2016 academic year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was also found that theunderlying reasons of this confusion were that “In both theory, the protons andneutrons are found together at the center of the atom (the nucleus) surrounded byelectrons spinning around it” and “students cannot differentiate between the conceptsof layer, orbit and shell”, and some recommendations were offered concerning theinstruction of these subjects.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015-2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Students come across with the notion of atom almost every year during theireducation life. Higher conceptual understandings of atomic theories among scienceteachers is of crucial importance in their understanding of physics and chemistrycourses. In this sense, the purpose of the present study is to investigate which of theatomic theories science teachers often confuse and to discuss the possible reasonsbehind the confusion of one theory with the other. This study used thephenomenology method of qualitative research. Participants of the study werecomprised of 55 first and second year university students attending the Department ofScience Teaching during the 2015-2016 academic year. In order to discover the mostconfusing atomic theories and the reasons of this confusion, students were asked towrite down the atomic theories that they often confuse with one another and thereasons why they do so. Using content analysis, two independent coders analyzed thecollected data. The result of the analyses revealed that students mostly got confusedbetween Bohr’s Atomic Theory and Modern Atomic Theory. It was also found that theunderlying reasons of this confusion were that “In both theory, the protons andneutrons are found together at the center of the atom (the nucleus) surrounded byelectrons spinning around it” and “students cannot differentiate between the conceptsof layer, orbit and shell”, and some recommendations were offered concerning theinstruction of these subjects.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BİLİR, V., BARAN, A. D., KARAÇAM, S. (2022). Atomıc Theories That Preservice Science Teachers Confuse and Underlying Reasons. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 212–220. https://ajindex.com/articles/547404

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Arık, A. & Polat, R. (2002). Lise kimya 1 ders kitabı. İstanbul:
  2. Oran Yayıncılık. Albenese, A. & Vicentini, M. (1997). Why do we belive that an atom is colourless? reflections about the teaching of the particle model, Science & Education, 6, 251-261.
  3. Bahar, M., Gündüz, S. & Doğan, S. (2006). Bilim Tarihine Kısa Bir Bakış (Editör: Mehmet Bahar) Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretimi içinde 1–32, Ankara:
  4. PEGEMA Yayıncılık. Bilir, V., Digilli Baran, A., &. Karaçam, S. (2016). “The science teacher candidates’ images related to atom models”, International Congresses on Education. Sarajevo/Bosnia and Herzegovina (2-4 June). Creswell, J.W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri (Çev.ed. Bütün, M. ve Demir, S.B.). Ankara:Siyasal Yayıncılık. Cokelez, A. & Dumon, A. (2005). Atom and molecule: upper secondary school french students’ representations in long-term memor, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6 (3), 119-135, 2005.
  5. Çökelez, A. & Yalçın, S. (2012). İlköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin atom kavramı ile ilgili zihinsel modellerinin incelenmesi, İlköğretim Online, 11(2), 452-471, 2012.
  6. Demirci, S. & Yılmaz, A & Şahin E. (2016). Lise ve üniversite öğrencilerinin atomun yapısı ile ilgili zihinsel modellerine genel bir bakış. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Chemical Education, Cilt 1, Sayı 1, 2016
  7. Demircioğlu, G. Altuntaş Aydın, M., & Demircioğlu, H. (2012). Kavramsal değişim metninin ve üç boyutlu modelin 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin atomun yapısını anlamalarına etkisi, Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 7, Sayı 2, 2012.
  8. Entwistle, N. (1997). Introduction: Phenomenography in higher education. Higher Educ. Res. Dev. 16, 127. Erduran, S. (2014). A holistic approach to the atom in school chemistry. Educació Química EduQ número 19, p. 39-42
  9. Gilbert, J.K. & Watts, D.M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing perspectives in science education, Studies in Science Education, 10, 61-98.
  10. Griffiths, A.K. & Preston, K.R. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamentel charecteristics of atoms and molecules, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 6, 611-628.
  11. Harrison, A.G. & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry, Science Education, 80, 5, 509-534.
  12. Jong, O.D. (2009). How to teach scientific models and modelling: A study of prospective chemistry teachers’ knowledge base, International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 829-850.
  13. Kahraman, S. (2010)