Dergiler / Istanbul Business Research / 2018 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2

Risk and Return Characteristics of Islamic Indices: An Empirical Approach

Sayfa
124–153
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In other words, it canbe said that Islamic index investors do not bear extra costs in the examined cases.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The main purpose of this research is to demonstrate the risk and return characteristics of Islamic indices.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, most of these findings and tests are notstatistically significant.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In other words, it canbe said that Islamic index investors do not bear extra costs in the examined cases.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to demonstrate the risk and return characteristics of Islamic indices. Islamic indices calculated by DJ and MSCI in the case of Turkey, Malaysia, USA, and the UK are examined in the widest time range.Respective conventional benchmark indices have also been included in the analysis to evaluate the empirical findings ina comparative manner. In the empirical research in which the mean-variance analysis framework is adopted, single andmulti-factor asset pricing models are also applied together with ratio analysis. According to the empirical findings, thereare noticeable differences between the risk and return characteristics of Islamic indices and their conventional counterparts depending on the country, index type and time period studied. Islamic indices tend to perform better and to havea lower level of systematic risk than their conventional counterparts. However, most of these findings and tests are notstatistically significant. Therefore, in technical terms, this study concludes that there is no significant difference betweenthe risk and return characteristics of Islamic indices and conventional counterparts. Some evidence has been found supporting the widely asserted claim that Islamic indices do not have an optimal risk-return profile by opponent researchers.However, when the absolute and risk-adjusted returns and alpha coefficients provided by Islamic indices are taken intoaccount it appears that Islamic indices do not perform poorly than their conventional counterparts. In other words, it canbe said that Islamic index investors do not bear extra costs in the examined cases.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Camgöz, M., Köse, K. A., Seval, B. (2022). Risk and Return Characteristics of Islamic Indices: An Empirical Approach. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 124–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/542774

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Alam, N., & Rajjaque, M. S. (2010). Shariah-compliant equities: Empirical evaluation of performance in the European market during credit crunch. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 15(3), 228–240.
  2. Al-Khazali, O., Lean, H. H., & Samet, A. (2014). Do Islamic stock indexes outperform conventional stock indexes?: A stochastic dominance approach. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 28:29–46.
  3. Ashraf, D. (2016). Does Shari’ah screening cause abnormal returns?: Empirical evidence from Islamic equity indices. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 209–228.
  4. Ashraf, D., & Mohammad, N. (2014). Matching perception with the reality?: Performance of Islamic equity investments. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 28, 175–189.
  5. Bauer, R., Otten, R., & Rad, A. T. (2006). Ethical investing in Australia: Is there a financial penalty? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 14(1), 33–48.
  6. BinMahfouz, S. S. (2012). Investment characteristics of Islamic investment portfolios: Evidence from Saudi mutual funds and global indices. Ph.D. Dissertation, Durham University. Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4440/
  7. BinMahfouz, S., & Hassan, M. K. (2013). Sustainable and socially responsible investing: Does Islamic investing make a difference? Humanomics, 29(3), 164–186. Boujelbène Abbes, M. (2012). Risk and return of Islamic and conventional indices. International Journal of Euro-Mediterranean Studies, 5(1), 1–23.
  8. Breen, W. J., & Lerner, E. M. (1973). Corporate financial strategies and market measures of risk and return. The Journal of Finance, 28(2), 339–351.
  9. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82.
  10. Charfeddine, L., Najah, A., & Teulon, F. (2016). Socially responsible investing and Islamic funds: New perspectives for portfolio allocation. Research in International Business and Finance, 36, 351–361.
  11. Dewandaru, G., Bacha, O. I., Masih, A. M. M., & Masih, R. (2015). Risk-return characteristics of Islamic equity indices: Multi-timescales analysis. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 29, 115–138.
  12. Erragraguy, E., & Revelli, C. (2015). Should Islamic investors consider SRI criteria in their investment strategies? Finance Research Letters, 14, 11–19.
  13. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465.
  14. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.
  15. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (