KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Istanbul Business Research / 2021 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

Direct and Indirect Effects of Cash Dividend Policies on Firms’ Capital Accumulation in Selected Developed Markets*

Nasuh Oğuzhan ALTAY
Mustafa ÇAYIR
Sayfa
235–254
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Also, the results that the cash dividend policies positively affect the market value of firms are mounting evidence to the validity of Signalling and Information Content Approach and Bird in Hand Theory. .

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:500), The United Kingdom (FTSE 100), Japan (Nikkei 225), and France (CAC 40) have been investigated in this study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The dataset used in the study consists of annual observations between 2010 and 2015.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Also, the results that the cash dividend policies positively affect the market value of firms are mounting evidence to the validity of Signalling and Information Content Approach and Bird in Hand Theory. .
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

500), The United Kingdom (FTSE 100), Japan (Nikkei 225), and France (CAC 40) have been investigated in this study. The dataset used in the study consists of annual observations between 2010 and 2015. Also, the data were retrieved from the Thomson Reuters database. The system in GMM is employed in the econometric estimations in this paper. “Total effect” of cash dividend policies on capital accumulation has been bisected as “direct” and “indirect” effects. In this study, we call the effect of the cash dividend policies on investments via financial and liquidity constraints as “direct effect” and the effect of the policies on the accumulation via market value and business reputation as “indirect effect”. Obtained results show that the indirect effect is positive, whereas the direct effect is negative. However , the magnitude of the direct effect is larger than that of the indirect. Therefore , the total effect of cash dividend policies on the accumulation of capital and investments is negative. The fact that movements in stock prices of firms have an effect on the capital accumulation has shown that the financial markets could affect real economic variables. Also, the results that the cash dividend policies positively affect the market value of firms are mounting evidence to the validity of Signalling and Information Content Approach and Bird in Hand Theory. .

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALTAY, N. O., ÇAYIR, M. (2022). Direct and Indirect Effects of Cash Dividend Policies on Firms’ Capital Accumulation in Selected Developed Markets*. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 235–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/542751

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Abor, J. Y., &Amidu, M. (2006). Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios in Ghana. The Journal of Risk Finance, 7(2), 136 – 145. Abor, J., & Bokpin, G. A. (2010).
  2. Investment Opportunities, Corporate Finance, and Dividend Payout Policy: Evidence from Emerging Markets. Studies in Economics and Finance, 27(3), 180 – 194. Agca, S., & Mozumdar A. (2017). Investment – Cash Flow Sensitivity: Fact or Fiction. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(3), 1111 – 41. Ahsan, A. F. M. M. (2012). Can ROE be Used to Predict Portfolio Performance?. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 7(2), 132 – 48. Aivazian, V., Booth, L., & Cleary, S. (2003). Do Emerging Market Firms Follow Different Dividend Policies from U.S. Firms?. The Journal of Financial Research, 26(3), 371 – 87. Allen, F., & Michaely, R. (2003). Payout Policy. Handbook of the Economics of Finance: Corporate Finance, Vol. 1A, ed. GM Constantinides, M Harris, RM Stulz, pp. 337 – 429. Amsterdam: North Holland. Alti, A. (2003). How Sensitive is Investment to Cash Flow When Financing is Frictionless. The Journal of Finance, 58(2), 707 – 22. Anwaar, M. (2016). Impact of Firms’ Performance on Stock Returns (Evidence from Listed Companies of FTSE-100 Index London, UK). Global Journal of Management and Business Research 16(1), 30 – 39. Arellano, M., Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2):, 277 – 97. Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995). Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Model. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1995), 29 – 51. Baker, M., Wurgler, J. (2004a). Appearing and Disappearing Dividends: The Link to Catering Incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2004), 271 – 88. Baker, M., Wurgler, J. (2004b). A Catering Theory of Dividends. The Journal of Finance, 59(3), 1125 – 65. Barro, R. J. (1990). The Stock Market and Investment. The Review of Financial Studies., 3(1), 115 – 31. Berk, J., DeMarzo, P. (2017).
  3. Corporate Finance, Vol 4: Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. Bischoff, C. W. (1970). A Model of Nonresidential Construction in the United States. The American Economic Review, 60(2), 10 – 7. Blanchard, O., Rhee, C., & Summers, L. (1993).
  4. The Stock Market, Profit, and Investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(1), 115 – 36. Blundell, B., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal o