Dergiler / Istanbul Business Research / 2021 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Institutional Environment, General Self- Efficacy and Desirability On Social Entrepreneurship Intentions in Turkey

Sayfa
411–434
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study provides a new understanding of the factors that affect the intention of social entrepreneurship and provides an insight into which variables can be prioritized in countries with problems such as environmental pollution, migration and unemployment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of the institutional environment on general self-efficacy and desirability as well as the impact of general self-efficacy and desirability on social entrepreneurship intentions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In total 500 questionnaires were distributed among university students and 367 usable questionnaires were returned and analysed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study provides a new understanding of the factors that affect the intention of social entrepreneurship and provides an insight into which variables can be prioritized in countries with problems such as environmental pollution, migration and unemployment.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of the institutional environment on general self-efficacy and desirability as well as the impact of general self-efficacy and desirability on social entrepreneurship intentions. For data collection a structured questionnaire was used. In total 500 questionnaires were distributed among university students and 367 usable questionnaires were returned and analysed. The structural equation modelling was used to investigate the relationship between the study variables. The findings revealed significant relationships among the research variables. It was found that the dimension of the regulatory environment has a positive impact on desirability and the dimension of the cognitive environment has a positive impact on general self-efficacy. The findings also showed a positive relationship among general self-efficacy, desirability and social entrepreneurship intentions. This study was carried out by using a convenience sampling method on university students. Within the scope of the research, the variables of the institutional environment, general self-efficacy and desirability are discussed in terms of social entrepreneurship intention. The study provides a new understanding of the factors that affect the intention of social entrepreneurship and provides an insight into which variables can be prioritized in countries with problems such as environmental pollution, migration and unemployment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYABAŞI, A., KARAVELİOĞLU, C., ÖZLER, N. D. E. (2022). The Effect of Institutional Environment, General Self- Efficacy and Desirability On Social Entrepreneurship Intentions in Turkey. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 411–434. https://ajindex.com/articles/542742

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Ahmed, I., Nawaz, M. M., Ahmad, Z., Shaukat, M. Z., Usman, A., Rehman, W. U. and Ahmed, N. (2010). Determinants of students’ entrepreneurial career intentions: Evidence from business graduates. European Journal of Social Sciences, 15(2), 14-22.
  2. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 27-58.
  3. Amine, L. S. and Staub, K. M. (2009). Women entrepreneurs in sub-Saharan Africa: An institutional theory analysis from a social marketing point of view. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21(2), 183- 211. Arasti, Z., Pasvishe, F. A. and Motavaseli, M. (2012). Normative institutional factors affecting entrepreneurial intention in iranian information technology sector. Journal of Management and Strategy, 3(2), 16. Austin, J., Stevenson, H. and Wei-Skillern, J. (2012). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both?. Revista de Administração, 47(3), 370-384.
  4. Bagozzi, R., Yi, Y. and Philips, L. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organisational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421-458.
  5. British Council, Turkiye, (2019). Situation of Social Venture in Turkey. https://www.britishcouncil.org.tr/ programmes/education/social-enterprise-research (Access: 13.11.2019).
  6. Buli, B. M. and Yesuf, W. M. (2015). Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions: Technical-vocational education and training students in Ethiopia. Education+Training, 57(8/9), 891-907.
  7. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, And Programming. Routledge. Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika, 72(2), 263. Díaz-Casero, J.C., Ferreira, J.J.M., Mogollón, R.H. and Raposo, M.L.B. (2012). Influence of institutional environment on entrepreneurial intention: a comparative study of two countries university students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(1), pp. 55-74.
  8. El Ebrashi, R. (2013), “Social entrepreneurship theory and sustainable social impact”, Social Responsibility Journal, 9(2), 188-209. Estrada-Robles,M., Williams, N. and Vorley, T. (2018). Navigating institutional challenges inMexico: the role of social capital in entrepreneurial families. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, available at: https://doi-org.proxy.library.dmu.ac.uk/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2017-0180.
  9. Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., ur Rehman, S., Fayolle, A., Jaafar, N. and Ayupp, K. (2018). Impact of sup