KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF PRACTICUM EXPERIENCE: FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF PRESERVICE EFL TEACHERS

Hasan BEDİR
Gülten KOŞAR
Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
1001–1016
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings also reported thatreflecting on practicum experiences helped them enhance their professional learning.Besides, the courses taken at university were not recognized as adequate to prepare PEFLTsfor real teaching.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Practicum is regarded to be a pivotal component of initial teacher education programs andsuch a considerable significance taken on by practicum necessitates more research regardlessof the abundance of research on it.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The resultsyielded by the inductive analysis of the data drawn from focus group interviews, the datafrom diaries and self-evaluation forms showed that PEFLTs deemed practicum experiencecrucial for both their professional learning and putting subject knowledge into practice whilestating a set of negative experiences they had in practicum.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings also reported thatreflecting on practicum experiences helped them enhance their professional learning.Besides, the courses taken at university were not recognized as adequate to prepare PEFLTsfor real teaching.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Practicum is regarded to be a pivotal component of initial teacher education programs andsuch a considerable significance taken on by practicum necessitates more research regardlessof the abundance of research on it. This case study explores a) how eight preservice EFLteachers (PEFLTs) evaluated the overall effectiveness of the practicum they took in the lastterm of the English language teacher education program they were enrolled in, b) the impactof keeping diaries and filling out self-evaluation forms on their professional learning, c) towhat extent the courses offered at the program supported them in real teaching, and d) whatthey would change in the structure of practicum if they had the chance to do so. The resultsyielded by the inductive analysis of the data drawn from focus group interviews, the datafrom diaries and self-evaluation forms showed that PEFLTs deemed practicum experiencecrucial for both their professional learning and putting subject knowledge into practice whilestating a set of negative experiences they had in practicum. The findings also reported thatreflecting on practicum experiences helped them enhance their professional learning.Besides, the courses taken at university were not recognized as adequate to prepare PEFLTsfor real teaching.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BEDİR, H., KOŞAR, G. (2022). A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF PRACTICUM EXPERIENCE: FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF PRESERVICE EFL TEACHERS. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 1001–1016. https://ajindex.com/articles/542345

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Allen, J. M., & Wright, S. E. (2014). Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum. Teachers and Teaching, 20(2), 136-151.
  2. Barahona, M. (2019). What matters to supervisors and is this reflected in what they do? Analysing the work of university supervisors of the practicum. Journal of Education for Teaching, 45(3), 262-276.
  3. Başyurt Tüzel, A. E., & Akcan S. (2009). Raising the language awareness of pre-service English teachers in an EFL context. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 271-287.
  4. Borg, S. (2009). Language teacher cognition. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 163-171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Assessment International Education. (2018). Developing your school with Cambridge: A guide for school leaders. Retrieved from https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/271311-evaluating-teaching.pdf
  5. Choy, D., Wong, A. F. L., Goh, K. C., & Low, E. L. (2014). Practicum experience: Preservice teachers’ self-perception of their professional growth. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(5), 472-482.
  6. Cohen, E., Hoz, R., & Kaplan, H. (2013). The practicum in preservice teacher education: A review of empirical studies. Teaching Education, 24(4), 345-380.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry research design: Choosing among five approaches. California: Sage Publications, Inc. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Education research. Boston: Pearson. Donovan, M. K., & Cannon, S. O. (2018). The university supervisor, edTPA, and the new making of the teacher. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(28), 1–30.
  8. Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Novice-service language teacher development: Bridging the gap between preservive and in-service education and development. TESOL Quarterly, 46(3), 435-449.
  9. Gebhard, J. G. (2009). The Practicum. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 250-258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Grudnoff, L. (2011). Rethinking the practicum: Limitations and possibilities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 223-234.
  11. Grudnoff, L., Haigh, M., & Mackisack, V. (2017). Re-envisaging and reinvigorating school– university practicum partnerships. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 180-193.
  12. Karen, R., & Beckford, C. (2010). Supporting Associate Teaching and Mentoring of Teacher Candidates: Building a Community of Practice. Literacy Information and Computer E