KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Online Journal of Primary Education / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

DEVELOPMENT OF THE GOAL SETTING SKILLS SCALE FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: ITS VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY ACROSS TIME

Banu YÜCEL TOY
Barış SARıSOY
Sayfa
456–468
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The two structures revealed by the scale were determined to measure the goal decision making skills and the goal-directed process management skills, and the reliability coefficient is .78 and .80 (workgroup 1) and .67 and .78 (workgroup 2), respectively.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study is a scale development study aimed at determining the goal setting skills of primary school students.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The scale, which was developed to determine the goal setting skills of the students who are studying at the 4th and 5th grade levels of primary education, consists of items in a way that students can make self-evaluation about their goal setting skills.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The two structures revealed by the scale were determined to measure the goal decision making skills and the goal-directed process management skills, and the reliability coefficient is .78 and .80 (workgroup 1) and .67 and .78 (workgroup 2), respectively.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study is a scale development study aimed at determining the goal setting skills of primary school students. The scale, which was developed to determine the goal setting skills of the students who are studying at the 4th and 5th grade levels of primary education, consists of items in a way that students can make self-evaluation about their goal setting skills. This scale development study was conducted with two study groups. The validity and reliability analysis of the first study data in 2014 showed that the scale has a two-factorial structure. Validity and reliability analyses performed on the data collected in 2019 once again revealed that this structure was valid and reliable, independent of time. The two structures revealed by the scale were determined to measure the goal decision making skills and the goal-directed process management skills, and the reliability coefficient is .78 and .80 (workgroup 1) and .67 and .78 (workgroup 2), respectively.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TOY, B. Y., SARıSOY, B. (2022). DEVELOPMENT OF THE GOAL SETTING SKILLS SCALE FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: ITS VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY ACROSS TIME. International Online Journal of Primary Education, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 456–468. https://ajindex.com/articles/542055

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Adair, J. E. (2005). How to grow leaders: The seven key principles of effective leadership development. Kogan Page Publishers.
  2. Ağbuğa, B. (2014). Validity and reliability of 3 x 2 achievement goal model scale in Turkish undergraduate students. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 25(3), 109-117.
  3. Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary educational psychology, 22(3), 269-298.
  4. Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(8), 811-831.
  5. Arslan, N., Turhan, N., Bingöl, T., Öztabak, M. Ü., & Çetintaş, Ş. (2018). Adaptation of social achievement goal scale. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 47(47), 39-50.
  6. Arslan, S., & Gelişli, Y. (2015). Development of perceived self-regulation scale: Validity and reliability study. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(3), 67-74.
  7. Bakioğlu, F., & Eraslan-Çapan, B. (2015). Daily goals scale: Psychometric properties of the Turkish version. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 16, 64-72.
  8. Baltaş, A. (2020). Hayatın hakkını vermek. Doğan Kitap Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley. Büyüköztürk, S., Akgün, Ö. E., Özkahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 4(2), 231-237.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 2017, 1-360.
  10. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K., & Morrison, R. B. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. Conrad, N., Doering, B. K., Rief, W., & Exner, C. (2010). Looking beyond the importance of life goals. The personal goal model of subjective well-being in neuropsychological rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 24(5), 431-443.
  11. Covey, S. R. (2014). The 7 habits of highly effective people: Powerful lessons in personal change. Simon and Schuster. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happine